Hello everyone!
I am in the market of buying another truck. It's really hard to find a truck with good specs, (ISX15 485HP with 13 SPD). Ok, so I found a truck that has all the specs I am looking for, but just one problem. The ratio is 3.55. I was looking for 3.36 as one would assume you would have better MPG. This truck for the most part will be OTR pulling a 53' reefer. This truck is at a dealership, I got hold of the previous owner by doing some research. It was previously used to pull a flatbed. Previous owner said they are switching their trucks from KW's to Internationals because of better fuel economy.Well that's a whole another discussion, I want to get a KW because of the build quality. Anyone has any experience of having these trucks with different rear ratios? What type of fuel MPG difference am I looking at?
Truck will be running on a dedicated route from Stockton, CA to Dallas, TX on i-40 traveling at 68-70 MPH. Truck will be at 80,000 LBS Maxed out one way and with a lightweight 15,000 lbs load on the back haul.
Specs on this truck I'm considering purchasing: Cummins ISX15 500HP, 13 speed, ratio 3.55
Looking forward to hearing from ya'll!
Ratio 3.36 VS 3.55 on a 2012 KW T660 effects on fuel economy
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by RomanSGI, Apr 27, 2015.
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I'm thinking on that lane a 3.55 or 3.58 would suit you better with the 13 speed and the weight.
68-70 mph? If you tone that down to 63-66 mph, might help the MPG a bit . . .
I'm running N-14 /13speed/3.55 - flatbed and 90 day average is 7.1mpg. KW T2000, 63-67 mph most times.RomanSGI Thanks this. -
What size tires ? You should not assume 3.36 will get better fuel mileage than 3.55, could be total opposite. What matters is what speed you intend to run and what rpm the engine will be at when you run that speed.
with 3.55 and low-pro 22.5 tires, I think you would be around 1450 rpms @ 64 mph in 13, which may be about perfect with a load on. With the 3.36 and again assuming low-pro 22.5 tires you could probably run 12th and do 1400 rpm's about 60 mph, or 13th 1400-1450 for 70 mph.
So, if you want to run 64, you may be better off with the 3.55, if you want to run 60 or 70 you may be better off with the 3.36
I'm just estimating though, there are calculator's but you would really want to run the truck (preferably with GPS checking speed). See where you're at say 55, 60, 65, 70. Because something could have been changed along the way, gears could be different or trans could have an oddball gear in it or something.blairandgretchen and RomanSGI Thank this. -
blairandgretchen & dannythetrucke Thank you for your replies! I knew I was missing something in the picture. That's exactly what I was hoping to hear. I should pick up this truck next week. Will post ya'll pictures and details. Once again, thank you very much for your reply! If your ever in the area, i-5 Lathrop - Stockton, CA or Fort Worth, TX I'd be more than happy to buy some beer with Texas Roadhouse steak!
dannythetrucker and blairandgretchen Thank this. -
Hey Danny ! We're missing out on an opportunity here! Apparently the nuts and bolts that rattle around our empty skulls actually passes for knowledge, AND, can be turned into BEER! -
the bone in Ribeye at TX Roadhouse is a #### fine steak !
-
I've run mostly volvo with cummins.. but my experience is that 3.36 with 13sp on 22s dies out way too easy on hills. And mpg was HORRIBLE (but i was hauling an 8 car hauler. Average gross 73k) Not sure if the truck was not up kept or what..
but my isx 550 13sp on 22s with 3.58 is a pleasure to drive. At 70mph I'm at 1500rpm. And rarely do I go over that.
With a dry van and about 30k in the box I'm typically 6.3-6.6mpg2013Maxx Thanks this. -
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.