Truckers' Trucking Forum | Largest Class A Message Board - The Premier Truck Drivers Forum!  

Trucker MySpace - Truckers Making Friends. Chicken Truckers Come Meet Other Truckers!

Truck Trading Post - New Classified Ads Section! Post for Free, Sell Your Stuff Fast!




Go Back   Truckers' Trucking Forum | Largest Class A Message Board > The Owner Operators' Getaway > Ask An Owner Operator

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum

Ask An Owner Operator Always wanted to become an owner operator? This is a place to get tips & advice from owner operators & small business owners here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  ^ Top   #1  
Old 12.17.2008
Light Load Member
 
Last Seen: 05.18.2009 02.57 PM
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Belding, Mi
Trucker? 13 Years
Age: 40
Posts: 77
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked: 22 Times
Western Star

OK I looked at the older post on this but didn't find what I was looking for.

I had a chance to ran a friends Western Star 4900SA with the Ultra High Rise and I really liked it ran great pulled like it was empty while at 80,000.

I didn't get a chance to talk to him about the setup of the truck so I want to ask a few questions about them.

1.) Engines: CAT up to 625hp, Detroit up to 625hp, Mercedes-Benz up to 625hp.....But dose not say anything about offering a Cummins.....Can you get a cummins? and if not I say CAT but not real sure with fuel mileage..????

2.) How dose a Western Star stand up with W9's, Pete 379's, 389's....

3.) Resale...?????? Is a Western Star looked at as a Freight liner or do they stand alone as Western Star.


4.) Rear's: I have seen some with 3.73, 3.55, 3.58, 3.42, 3.21....Now I have heard the newer engine run the lower (3.21) better and get better MPG.

OK last one the 4900EX (hood) 132" BBC, 33"BA or 4900SA 109 & 123" BBC, 50" BA.......I like them both....Help.....ALL the help you can give would be great..
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #2  
Old 12.17.2008
Medium Load Member
 
Last Seen: 02.21.2009 05.07 PM
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Milton, VT.
Trucker? 32 Years
Age: 57
Posts: 303
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked: 184 Times
3:21 with 24.5 low profile and a 13 speed will give you 68 mph at 1300 rpm, I run a Western Star with a C13 Caterpillar, 430 hp 1750 fpt, I love the truck, hate the engine, gutless wonder, dies on the hills because there's no power. I would carry a spare blower motor with the tools to change it. I've driven a 2008 since August 6th 2007 and I've changed the cab blower motor four times. You can't get enough heat or A/C without it. The blower motors are about $98.00 each. Tat's been the biggest problem with the truck, I won't go into the BS with the C13 Caterpillar, as I type this I'm waiting overnight for parts to come in so I can get my truck repaired at Butler in Sioux Falls SD. I've been in so may Caterpillar shops with this truck I know most of the mechanics by name.
Our standing joke with my company is, "If the truck catches fire use the fire extinguisher to beat off anyone who tries to put the fire out."
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #3  
Old 12.17.2008
Light Load Member
 
Last Seen: 05.18.2009 02.57 PM
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Belding, Mi
Trucker? 13 Years
Age: 40
Posts: 77
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked: 22 Times
LOL.....I'm not sure on the HP yet...I will pulling a 53FT reefer and not sure on the area I will be in most.

I was told if you are going to run 3.36, 3.26, 3.21 you need to run 22.5 lo-pro and it would pull the hills better then 24.5's...I don't know why but I have been told that so many times..
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #4  
Old 12.17.2008
Medium Load Member
 
Last Seen: 02.21.2009 05.07 PM
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Milton, VT.
Trucker? 32 Years
Age: 57
Posts: 303
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked: 184 Times
You should chose the tire size you want, then gear the truck for the power and speed. I wouldn't own or drive a truck with short tires, I'm running Michelin Xone Super Singles, 455/55 22.5, which are the same hight as 24.5 low pro. some of our tractors and most of the trailers have 445/50 22.5 Singles and the tractors are too low. Super Singles are junk! they suck in the snow. If I owned a truck I'd have dual 24.5 drives, with 3:55 locking rears.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #5  
Old 12.18.2008
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 3 Weeks Ago 10.26 AM
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Indiana
Trucker? 18 Years
Posts: 11
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
I have a 97 star and love the truck only problem I see is they weigh more than most. Also part availibilty is not very good. Most dealers do not stock many star parts.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #6  
Old 12.18.2008
Light Load Member
 
Last Seen: 05.18.2009 02.57 PM
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Belding, Mi
Trucker? 13 Years
Age: 40
Posts: 77
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked: 22 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by sawdust View Post
I have a 97 star and love the truck only problem I see is they weigh more than most. Also part availibilty is not very good. Most dealers do not stock many star parts.

Do Stars weigh more then a W9? How is the driveablity ride good? Anything rattle, sqeek....?

I want to find ou if I can get a Star with a Cummins ISX....If not it may be a Cat 500 to 550.

Tire size....I like the 24.5's but the Stars sit high so I was thinking 22.5 lo pro's......but I like the idea of the 455/55 22.5's

I am trying to set up a trck that I can run around 65/70 and get 6.5 to 7 mpg STOP LAUGHING........and still pull Donner and the Twin sisters grossed out at 80,000 with out much of a problem
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #7  
Old 12.18.2008
Trucker Forum STAFF
 
Last Seen: 14 Hours Ago 12.10 PM
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Northeast Iowa
Trucker? 5 Years
Posts: 2,540
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 645
Thanked: 441 Times
Fitzgeralds would probably be able to put together a glider for you using a N-14, they don't do any with the ISX as far as I know. I have read that an Australian company is putting together N-14s with Stars.

Why don't you just buy the brand of truck that has the engine you want? The resale would probably be better than a truck that was never mass produced unless you found a buyer that liked a novelty.

The big advantage to the Western Star is the wide cab, next would be the Starlight Sleeper, it's quiet and lighter in weight than the older ones. You could keep the weight down with careful specs, like no more wheelbase than you actually need to hook to most trailers, most of the Stars I have seen are too long.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #8  
Old 12.18.2008
Road Train Member
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, Or.
Trucker? 50 Years
Posts: 1,196
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 615
Thanked: 763 Times
I have a friend that has a 2001 W900 that is 800# heavier than my 2001 WS. His is 260" WB vs my 244". Somewhere you reach a point where reduced weight = reduced reliability and longivity.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #9  
Old 12.19.2008
5mouths2feed's Avatar
"Family Man"
 
Last Seen: 11 Hours Ago 03.12 PM
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Blackshear, GA
Trucker? No Answer
Age: 47
Posts: 1,165
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 326
Thanked: 300 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Wolf View Post
LOL.....I'm not sure on the HP yet...I will pulling a 53FT reefer and not sure on the area I will be in most.

I was told if you are going to run 3.36, 3.26, 3.21 you need to run 22.5 lo-pro and it would pull the hills better then 24.5's...I don't know why but I have been told that so many times..
I have PM'ed you the info you need to calculate engine RPM's at a chosen MPH. Tire sizes make a small change from 22.5lp to 24 tall there is about 100 rpm difference. 22.5lp are 41". 22.5 tall and 24.5lp are roughly the same height of 42". 24 Talls are 44". Of course manufacturers are going to differ some but within the same brand they will be about a 3 in. difference from shortest to tallest. Your biggest change comes in the transmission and rears you choose. The reason for 22.5lps is that they will typically give better milage due to less rolling resistance. The need for them with the taller rear gears is that the tires will give you back about 100rpm to put your motor in its tourqe range and not lug the motor. You want it speced so that the rpm's are no less than 1200rpm at 55mph in top gear. Once you start playing with the info I sent you it will all make more sense. I have not heard good things about the singles. Availability over the road and poor wear are what I have heard most. I don't know how tall the singles are but asumming they are equal to a 22.5lp you would need these specs to get best milage. .73 final ttrans, 3.36 rears and the 22.5lp at 41" 65mph = 1307rpm 70mph= 1407rpm. I think a 3.55 would be a better choice for mountain driving. .73 final, 3.55 rears, 22.5lp 65mph=1380 rpm 70mph= 1487rpm. You never mentioned what tranny you are considering which would be a determining factor depending on where you are going to be hauling. Personally there are only 2 choices for tranny's 13 and 18. Given a choice I'd go 18 for the most versatility but if you know you are going 53ft reefer then 13 would be fine.
__________________
MY truck is my home and my office!!
When you turn off the power in yours, I will turn it off in mine!! Stop the stupidity! Stop in-humane Anti-idle laws..
Write the ACLU, OSHA & Comigress
===========================
Just becasue its "legal" doesn't mean it's safe! I know when I need to sleep and when I am safe to drive. Fight the HOS. Write your Congressman.

Last edited by 5mouths2feed; 12.19.2008 at 07.47 AM..
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #10  
Old 12.19.2008
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Last Seen: 06.28.2009 10.36 PM
Member Since: Nov 2008
Location: Grass Lake, MI
Trucker? 19 Years
Posts: 587
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 13
Thanked: 168 Times
Let me say I do not own a WS and never have. But, you are talking of gearing and tires. My 07 Volvo 780 runs the 24.5's, Super Single equivalent on the drives. 13 speed with 3:42 gears with power coming from a Cummins 530hp ISX.

She pulls great with this set up even grossed out in the hills. I rarely get stuck in the right lane while pulling a hill and can eat a Cat for lunch.

The fuel mileage right now pulling a van is roughly between 7-7.7 mpg, as long as I keep my foot out of it. Right now she is just breaking in at 130,000 miles on the odo.

And the tractor itself weighs, with full tanks, right at 21,500 lbs.

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Trucker Forum Replies Last Post
Western Star Expediter straight truck cool!!!! Baack Expediter Forum 9 01.02.2009 09.44 PM
Western Star seat problem... dirtyoldman Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] 3 09.24.2008 10.30 AM
western star air ride adj. SPIKE 64 Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] 3 04.18.2008 12.34 AM
Trying to Learn More about Western Star jamesv Ask An Owner Operator 10 03.29.2008 02.05 PM
any info on western star transportation in Carson, Ca.? drivermike Motor Carrier Questions - The Inside Scoop 1 02.01.2008 02.29 PM


.


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © TheTruckersReport.com - Trucking Forum & Message Board - Truck Driver Discussion - Truck Forum

Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy Statement.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO