I would like to know from you experienced car haulers what your preference is when it comes to stinger trailers? High rail? Or low rail? Boydstun? Or Cottrell? What's your preference? And why? What are some of the pros and cons to each? And to share any tips and tricks you may have in respect to loading or unloading either trailer.
Thanks.
High Rail or Low Rail? What's your preference? And Why?
Discussion in 'Car Hauler and Auto Carrier Trucking Forum' started by SQ609, Sep 29, 2014.
Page 1 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Any one??? Any of you experienced car haulers care to share some information or your personal preferences on these trailers to help some newbie car haulers know the differences? This shouldn't be too hard of a question.
-
If you want maximum versatility, high rail wins, hands down. Especially if you are doing multipick/drop loads, the ability to load or unload a car from the middle of the stack without unloading the whole top of the trailer has saved me more time than I could ever count. If the bottom is empty, you can unload #2, 3, 4, without unload any other cars from the top. The 7510 Cottrell low side can accomplish some of these tricks, but it's a tank and not as durable as the high rail. I put 800+k miles on my last one, and had one post crack near the end, but no other structural welding was ever needed. And that truck was rarely under gross. The low rails can be a touch quicker to load, especially with smaller loads, but when the loads get big the high rail wins again. Getting out isn't the major issue every one acts like it is (as long as your top rails are outside the posts,) and you learn where to load what, and only very long wheelbases on the 4/5 split cause problems.
We just bought 6 new Stars with CX-9s, and they are nice for the ability to place a dually in multiple positions, but I wouldn't take one over a high rail if I were to get back in a truck. Maybe if I only loaded 4 half-tons on the trailer everyday, I'd like it, but can't see any advantage worth the loss of flexibility.Speedloader, SQ609 and 10-34-1 Thank this. -
Thanks for that very informative reply Hammer166.
-
times 2 on the high rail. You will get guys that want nothing but a low rail and guys that want nothing but a high rail. Kind of like a Ford vs Chevy thing.
SQ609 Thanks this. -
Hey thanks for the reply sxdime. But do you care to elaborate?
-
The versatility of the high rail is why I own/run one. I ran a quick loader many years ago which is a form of the low rail but the top deck was all one unit with just the front that slid out. You can be very creative on a high rail as far as where to put units. As Hammer said you will hear guys mention low rails as there is no posts on the top to avoid when getting out of vehicles but once you know how to set up a high rail (meaning where to position decks park etc) you can put most anything on without a problem. The only thing is duallys which you are limited to basically one on a load. I try not to put them on period though due to weight etc. I let the truck hauler trucks move them.
SQ609 Thanks this. -
Ok. So it sounds like the high rail is the way to go as far as versatility and creativity when building a load. But would you guys still recommend the high rail over a low rail to a less experienced newbie just starting out in auto hauling? It seems as though the high rail would be good for the more experienced drivers and the low rail would be easier for the beginner. Thanks. -
-
Ok. I get it. That makes sense. I appreciate all the info from you guys. Thanks!
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 3