What CB is the best?

[lonewolf4ad]

Alright maybe a bit off topic, but how much does it cost to have somebody tune your cb? Like I said right now I am running a cobra 29 (not the bluetooth btw) and I reach for a few miles. My truck came with what I believe is stock dual antenna and coax.

[Rat]

Forget talkback. It is only a toy and can not be used for tuning the audio as what comes out of the talk back is not always that same that comes out of the speaker on someone elses rig.


As far as 70 miles on a low deadkey and 28 watts of swing. Sorry but I have to call BS on this one.

[Red Fox]

Low deadkey? I didn't say that. And numerous times I catch a guy up in Dalton Ga. from here in Acworth, 70 miles away at night when things are quiet. Daytime on Sesame street it's more like 12 miles or so, depending on ground noise and activity. I probably should have added that, but thot it was getting to be a long post. I'm also using my homemade antenna on the truck, and it's the best I've ever had.
I DO have variable deadkey tho, for using the amp if I want it. (it's wired to the mike gain pot)
Our experiments with local radios here gave us better results using headphones than the talkback speaker for setting audio. The speaker sort of hides a lot of the echo/reverb or overmodge IMO. And in one thing you're right: nothing substitutes hearing it for yourself on another radio. You sure can't go by what some driver tells you.
I prefer to set modulation by a meter. As hammers have proven, a good package is necessary for distance. I can only guess, but I've thought it was because more power would be available for the carrier if it's not being wasted in overmodge.
I never could get used to a radio without talkback once I'd had it, but that's me.

[FriedTater]

Well do you want to drive a Civic or a Corvette ?
If you buy your radios from Truck stops like Pilots then thats what you get.
Which as an entry level CB,granted prices vary at the "level" you choose to "Enter" but their all very limited by FCC in order to be sold in that venue.
Which is fine if all "You" need is basic to mid-grade performance.
By the time you purchase a radio with "your" budget/requirements and add a Mic and quality antenna,then have some low-buck radio hack at
MM# 370 or where ever slap a generic PEP swing tune and have you thinking you have "The Best" money can buy sitting on your dash.

Once you get tired of getting your little "mutt" walked by better quality equipment you start thinking about strapping on a "kicker" to get you up and running with the "BiG Dogs"Your getting near $500 invested at this point.

Now before any of you FCC/Big Radio haters decide to chime in with your Political Correct quoted Law(s) and opinions,be advised it will be ignored.

Stuck in a Company Truck ? worse yet get slip-seated ?
Go that Need for SPEED and believe you deserve abit more respect when you key up ?

Sure money is tight for everyone these days,setting aside a few bucks every week can quickly upgrade your "Radio Status".
AGAIN! its not for EVERYONE!!
How many times have you "tried" to give directions/information only to be smashed/walked on ?Same applies to receiving that information,its always the last part you miss due to better radio's laying the smack-down.
The misconception is "ALL BIG LOUD RADIO's HAVE KICKERS"!!
WRONG,WRONG,WRONG!!

I don't run a Galaxy 99 or a kicker and I rarely get walked on.
Why ? Superior Radio,Superior Tuning but most importantly
INSTALLED CORRECTLY !!

You must move up to "Export" radio's (10 Meter)in order to be confident when you grab that RK/56 and pull the trigger.

Tater said It !

[Rat]

I personally am running a Connex 4300HP that has been aligned and peaked with a Top gun modulator and speech compressor installed. It is running through a set of Wilson 10 inch shaft 5000s that have been tuned flat across the board.

Just yesterday I was on my way to one of our loading spots and could faintly hear some of our drivers that were waiting in line. I keyed up and said "Hey Guys" and they came back with "were you at" ? I was about 15 miles out and told them were I was. They thought I was right around the corner pulling into the yard. One said I was slamming his needle. I was talking to them and was walking over some of them from 15 miles out. LOL


I also have a highly tuned and modified Cobra (Stealth) and it also does a great job but it will never outperform my Connex.

[Red Fox]

Hmmm...I've known of using modulators forever, but the speech compressor is a new twist to me; I can see how that would help. I wonder if I could use one out of a studio rack?

[FriedTater]

Sp.C's are a great mod,the FT-817 is good for around 5db.
You can get them fairly cheap at w4rt.com.
5db is a decent "punch" on DX Exports.

Originally Posted by Red Fox

Hmmm...I've known of using modulators forever, but the speech compressor is a new twist to me; I can see how that would help. I wonder if I could use one out of a studio rack?

[JSmitty]

Well, stay away from that Top Gun modulator. It's just a little piece of junk with a resistor and a capacitor on the board. I bought one and put it in a Connex 4600 I had.......nobody liked it.

[Gadfly]

Originally Posted by FriedTater

Well do you want to drive a Civic or a Corvette ?
If you buy your radios from Truck stops like Pilots then thats what you get.
Which as an entry level CB,granted prices vary at the "level" you choose to "Enter" but their all very limited by FCC in order to be sold in that venue.
Which is fine if all "You" need is basic to mid-grade performance.
By the time you purchase a radio with "your" budget/requirements and add a Mic and quality antenna,then have some low-buck radio hack at
MM# 370 or where ever slap a generic PEP swing tune and have you thinking you have "The Best" money can buy sitting on your dash.

Once you get tired of getting your little "mutt" walked by better quality equipment you start thinking about strapping on a "kicker" to get you up and running with the "BiG Dogs"Your getting near $500 invested at this point.

Now before any of you FCC/Big Radio haters decide to chime in with your Political Correct quoted Law(s) and opinions,be advised it will be ignored.





You must move up to "Export" radio's (10 Meter)in order to be confident when you grab that RK/56 and pull the trigger.

Tater said It !

HeeHee! Ignore THIS!!!

************************************************** *****

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) )
) In the Matter of ) File Number EB-07-TP-095

Richard Ross ) NAL/Acct. No. 200732700011
Titusville, FL ) FRN: 001-73713-29 ) ) )

NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE

Released: March 31, 2008 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau:

I. Introduction

1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Richard Ross, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), by operating an unlicensed radio transmitter. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Mr. Ross is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
II. BACKGROUND

2. On June 4, 2007, in response to complaints of interference, agents from the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") inspected the Citizens Band ("CB") station located at Mr. Ross' residence. During testing of Mr. Ross' equipment, the agents determined that two of his CB radio transmitters were non-certificated transceivers, capable of transmitting on unauthorized frequencies. The agents also measured the output power for his transmitters and found them to be operating with seven and eight watts, respectively, output powers greater than authorized in the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The agents orally warned Mr. Ross that use of non-certificated or modified equipment capable of transmitting on unauthorized frequencies and with greater power than authorized is strictly prohibited by the Rules and voided his authority to operate the CB station. Mr. Ross voluntarily surrendered both devices to the agents.

3. On July 10, 2007, in response to additional complaints of interference, the Tampa office sent an official letter, certified and regular mail, to Mr. Ross, restricting his hours of operation for his CB station. Specifically, the letter instructed Mr. Ross not to operate his CB station from 6 AM EST to 11:59 PM EST. On July 11, 2007, the Tampa office received a response to the official letter in which Mr. Ross claimed he was now in compliance with the rules.

4. On August 16, 2007, agents from the Tampa Office inspected Mr. Ross' CB station to confirm that his CB station was in compliance with the Rules. The agents found that Mr. Ross' CB radio station included a CB transmitter and two linear amplifiers. The agents measured the power of the CB transmitter and found it had an average power output of 3.5 watts carrier power. They tested the amplifiers combined power output and found the devices had the capability to boost the power of the station to several hundred times the authorized power level. The agents orally warned Mr. Ross that the use of linear amplifiers or any device that creates a power greater than the authorized limit is strictly prohibited by the Rules and voids the authority to operate the CB station. Mr. Ross voluntarily surrendered both linear amplifiers to the agents.

5. On November 20, 2007, in response to additional complaints of interference, at approximately 10:15 A.M., agents from the Tampa Office located the source of a strong signal on a CB radio channel using direction finding methods to Mr. Ross' residence. An agent recognized the voice of the transmissions to be that of Mr. Ross.

6. Still on November 20, 2007, agents from the Tampa Office inspected Mr. Ross CB station. A wattmeter measurement indicated the power of Mr. Ross' transmitter during the inspection to be two watts, under the maximum authorized power under the Rules. The agents then traced the coaxial cable from the output of the transmitter and found it was connected to a linear amplifier. Measurements taken with the amplifier connected to the CB transmitter indicated the amplifier had the capability to boost the power of the station to several hundred times the authorized power.

7. Still on November 20, 2007, the agents observed an open notebook. The notebook showed log entries that indicated that Mr. Ross made several long distance calls using his CB radio during that morning. The entries coincided with the times the agents, using direction finding techniques, traced transmissions originating from Mr. Ross' residence. The agents orally warned Mr. Ross that the use and possession of the linear amplifier and operating out of the authorized hours prescribed on the official letter issued on July 10, 2007 violated the Rules and voided his authority to operate the CB station.

III. DISCUSSION

8. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture penalty. The term "willful" as used in Section 503(b) of the Act has been interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are committed knowingly. The term "repeated" means the commission or omission of such act more than once or for more than one day.

9. Section 301 of the Act requires that no person shall use or operate any apparatus for the transmission of energy or communications or signals by radio within the United States except under and in accordance with the Act and with a license. Section 95.404 of the Rules states that CB operators do not require an individual license to operate a CB station because they are authorized by this rule to operate in accordance with the rules in this subpart. Individuals operating, pursuant to this provision, however, must operate their CB stations in accordance with the rules in this subpart.

10. Section 95.409(a) of the Rules states that you must use an FCC certificated CB transmitter at your CB station and that the use of a transmitter, which is not FCC certificated voids your authority to operate the station.
Section 95.410 of the Rules states that your CB station transmitter power output must not exceed ... under any conditions: 4 watts (carrier power). Use of a transmitter which has carrier power in excess of that authorized voids your authority to operate the station.

On June 4, 2007, agents from the Tampa Office determined that Mr. Ross operated his CB station with two non-certificated transmitters that had a power output of seven and eight watts (carrier power), respectively. On June 4, 2007, Mr. Ross was warned that operation of his CB station with a non-certificated transmitter and with a power level greater than authorized violated the Rules and voided his authority to operate his CB station.

11. Section 95.411(a) of the Rules states that you may not attach external radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers to your certificated CB transmitter in any way. Section 95.411(b) of the Rules states that there are no exceptions to this rule and that use of a power amplifier voids your authority to operate the station. The Commission will presume that you have used a power amplifier if it is in your possession and if there is other evidence of overpower operation.

On August 16, 2007, and on November 20, 2007, agents from the Tampa Office observed that Mr. Ross had attached linear amplifiers to his CB station. Immediately prior to the inspection on November 20, 2007, the agents observed Mr. Ross' CB station in operation. On August 16, 2007 and November 20, 2007, the agents determined that the amplifiers attached to Mr. Ross' CB station had the capability to boost the power of the station to several hundred times the authorized power level. On August 16, 2007, and November 20, 2007, Mr. Ross was warned that attaching linear amplifiers to his CB station violated the Rules and voided his authority to operate his CB station.

12. Section 95.423(a) of the Rules states that if the FCC tells you that your CB station is causing interference for technical reasons you must follow all instructions in the official FCC notice. Section 95.423(b) of the Rules states that you must comply with any restricted hours of CB station operation which may be included in the official notice. On July 10, 2007, the Tampa Office sent an official letter, certified and regular mail, to Mr. Ross. In the official letter Mr. Ross was instructed not to operate his CB station from 6 AM EST to 11:59 PM EST.

On November 20, 2007, the agents observed Mr. Ross operating his CB station out of the authorized hours (approximately 10:15 AM) established in the July 10, 2007 official letter. 13. Because Mr. Ross violated several sections of Part 95, Subpart D of the Rules, Mr. Ross voided his authority to operate his CB station pursuant to Section 95.404 of the Rules. Therefore, based on the evidence before us, we find that on June 4, August 16, and November 20, 2007, Mr. Ross willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by operating a radio transmitter, his CB station, without authorization from the Commission.

14. Pursuant to The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for operating without an instrument of authorization is $10,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the statutory factors set forth in Section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which include the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require. Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80 of the Rules, and the statutory factors to the instant case, we conclude that Mr. Ross is apparently liable for a $10,000 forfeiture.

IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

15. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311, 0.314 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Richard Ross, is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for violation of Section 301 of the Act.

16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Richard Ross, SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.

17. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Account Number and FRN Number referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101. Payment[s] by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full payment under an installment plan should be sent to:
Chief Financial Officer -- Financial Operations,
445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
Washington, D.C. 20554.

18. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, South Central Region, Tampa Office, 2203 N. Lois Avenue, Suite 1215, Tampa, Florida, 33607 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.

19. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted.

20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Richard Ross at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ralph M. Barlow District Director Tampa Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. S: 301. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission authorized by this Act...."
See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(2), which also applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 47 C.F.R. S: 95.404. 47 C.F.R. S: 95.409(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 95.410. 47 C.F.R. S: 95.411(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 95.411(b). See 47 C.F.R. S: 95.410. 47 C.F.R. S: 95.423(a) 47 C.F.R. S: 95.423(b) 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S:1.80. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S:S: 301, 503(b), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
************************************************** ********

Just forward the check to ME and I will use it wisely, I PROMISE! I PROMISE!!!

Ten Thousand clams is a lot of money to cry over! LOL!

Gadfly

[Red Fox]

My Gawd, the guy was interfering with locals, warned, warned, warned, warned again and STILL didn't have a clue. People like that DESERVE to get busted.
He could have simply cleaned up his transmissions, bought an A class amp and gotten away with it, right? I'd be nervous even about that once the feddy's were on to watching me. But that's the least I'd do, outside of powering down.