Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiego  You seem to have an irrational hateful attitude toward Schneider. You're condemning SNI for what they may or may not do? That Schneider is doing OK in a bad economy seems like a positive to me. |
I believe my post went over your head, so lets step back a minute and look at the thing I am saying in more elementary terms.
In this scenrio we will replace the company itself with police. And the driver is a standard member of the public.
A new law has been passed banning certain chewing gums in the town. The law clearly says what kind of chewing gum is allowed, and what aren't. But no one takes the law seriously, most people don't even know the law is there. And life goes on. People chew the gum the want, because who would really think there would be a law on chewing gum?
Then due to money issues, the city has to find ways to make money to solve a budget crisis. Someone says, hey we have this law here, its a law, and there is a big fine. And suddenly the police are sent on a witch hunt, looking for people with the banned gum. Arresting and fining them.
NOW the people are pissed, now they start speaking out about the stupid law, after they have already been hit with it. Because they let it go before, it wasn't a big deal, they never enforced it. So many people moved to the town ignorant of the existence of this law. Others knew but chose to stay because there was no issue to them. But now its too late, it will be an uphill battle to change it. And theres an issue now, now the only thing to do is move. And that can be a pricey thing.
I am not saying Schneider is evil. I do not like Schneider due to a personal expierence with them, but they are not 'evil'. But the above principle regarding the gum, however far fetched, is what I am saying happens when stupid rules go overlooked because they do not enforce them. It will come back to bite you in the butt.
Schneider SAYS you cannot have a cowboy hat, or a beard over 1" in their policy. They don't enforce it, thats the #1 response I am getting here. I've seen plenty of people with this and that breaking the policy. The fact is not that they don't enforce the fact is that they could. And I have an issue with the principle of lethargy as a reason its okay. The simple fact is if Schneider WANTED to fire you they have more dumb reasons then most companies to fire you. And once you get fired, your going to pay that 'fine' in time and money spent trying to find another job.
If any company wants to fire you thats fine, but they need a reason. If you deliver every load on time, don't have an accident or tickets, no damage to property... its harder to fire you. They can go hey you fired, yes they could. Without a reason though, they will fall into the unemployment payments. See, to get OUT of that they need a REASON. Something you did that was cause for being fired, breaking a company policy is a reason. So at the very heart of what I am saying, you could be fired for wearing a cowboy hat, if they wanted to, and lose your chance for unemployment because of it without a lengthy battle with the company.
Just saying.
PS: I've never gotten unemployment and don't know all the rules therein, but I looked it up a bit when I was fired from Werner and what I stated above from what I saw of the 'how to get unemployment faq' is a true statement. By no means do I claim to be an expert in unemployment matters.
Philosopher and discussions like that above are what I studied for one of my college stints. Debate team and all heh. I am not trying to rile people just get them to think a little deeper about the choices they make. Schneider is an alright company, but I have issues with the level of policy making they have chosen to employ. I realize there is little to be done t change it, but it can be freely discussed, complained about, and debated. That is the beauty of the internet and the US. 
01.17.2009
Linear Mode
