Mexico Threatens To Block Us Imports - Truckers' Trucking Forum | Message Board

Big Duker · **^ Top** #1 12.19.2007

Mexico is preparing to block US imports if the Congress does not allow Mexican truck trial to proceed. Maybe we are war with the wrong country.

WASHINGTON -- The Mexican government is considering blocking U.S. exports, such as pork and rice, should Congress cut off funding for a cross-border trucking program, as is expected to happen within days. Even if Congress ends funding for the contentious program through the catch-all spending bill that is under consideration, there is a growing expectation that the Bush administration will find a way to continue it in what some say would be an act of defiance and others say would be compliance with the law.
"We anticipate that they'll find a way to keep it going," said Leslie Miller, a spokeswoman for the Teamsters union, which opposes the program. "We know that they will do whatever they can to keep this program going."
U.S. transportation officials declined to say how they would respond to a cutoff of congressional funds.
"We're going to wait and see what happens and evaluate our next steps," said Melissa Mazzella DeLaney, a spokeswoman for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
The threat of trade sanctions adds a new twist to the debate over whether the one-year pilot program should continue.
"We learned that the Mexican government has recently been undertaking an exercise to estimate the impact of retaliating against the U.S. if this pilot program is halted," said Janet Kavinoky, a U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbyist who focuses on transportation legislation.
Kavinoky said she has been told that if the program is ended, "Mexico will retaliate by not allowing exports of U.S. pork, rice and possibly other products -- because we're violating NAFTA."
The chamber supports opening the U.S. border to Mexican trucks, an action it says would benefit the economies of both countries.
Mexico has had the right to impose trade sanctions over the failure to open the border to commercial traffic since 2001, when a NAFTA arbitration panel ruled against the United States in the dispute.
The administration began the program in September to test the safety of Mexican trucks in the United States. The program allows up to 100 Mexican carriers to send trucks throughout the country. An equal number of American trucks are being allowed to cross into Mexico for the first time.
If the program is successful, it would likely lead to a fuller opening of the border to commercial traffic, as required under NAFTA.
Opponents contend that Mexican trucks are not being held to the same standards as American drivers, creating a danger on highways. They have persuaded large majorities in the House and Senate to vote to shut down the program.
U.S. transportation officials insist that Mexican drivers are being held to the same standards through pre-authorization safety checks and monitoring.
Congress is expected to cut off funding for the program within days through a provision in an omnibus spending bill approved by the House and under consideration last night in the Senate.
Ricardo Alday, a spokesman for the Mexican Embassy, declined to say what action Mexico would take if Congress ends the program.
"Mexico will wait until the bill is enacted and then we will have to review the text and its implications," he said in a statement. "We are leaving all options on the table."
Many have assumed the congressional directive would end funding to the program, but a former U.S. transportation official disputes this.
Brigham McCown, a former general counsel for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, said the agency might be able to ignore the bill's provision.
The directive would cut off funds to "establish" a program, but it does not specifically rule out funding an ongoing program, said McCown, a lawyer at the Winstead PC law firm in Dallas.
"My sense is that language is not preventing (the Department of Transportation) from continuing to operate that which is already in existence," he said.
DeLaney declined to discuss the administration's view of the language in the directive.
"I don't think we have a position on this at this time," she said.
(The preceding article by Paul M. Krawzak was published by The Union-Tribune on December 19, 2007.)
December 19, 2007

TruckingBum · **^ Top** #2 12.19.2007

gReat let them block imports so we can block import'sfrom them also we dont need the mexican market anyways
we need fair tradewith china that's where all the consumers are.

hrdman2luv · **^ Top** #3 12.19.2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruckingBum

gReat let them block imports so we can block import'sfrom them also we dont need the mexican market anyways
we need fair tradewith china that's where all the consumers are.

This would really stick it to GE and GM. OH yeah....Bring it on baby.

Ronnocomot · **^ Top** #4 12.19.2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by hrdman2luv

This would really stick it to GE and GM. OH yeah....Bring it on baby.

Could you explain how "sticking it" to GM or GE would be good for anyone?

Who do you think GE and GM are?
Who owns GE and GM?

Do you have a clue?

Largecar40 · **^ Top** #5 12.19.2007

It drives me crazy to see that our goverment is so bent on screwing the American worker out of existance! We were doing fine before NAFTA and if they block our imports, so what! All that will happen if we open our borders to foreign trucks it will also bring increased crime and smuggling into our country. I was under the impression that after 911 open or even relaxed borders is a big ##### no no. Sorry guys, I just am sick of seeing industry after industry go the way of the dinosars! (sp)

smurf-316 · **^ Top** #6 12.19.2007

WTF?
no freak'n Taco's ?

bullhaulerswife · **^ Top** #7 12.19.2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by smurf-316

WTF?
no freak'n Taco's ?

You can make your own, do you need a recipe?

Oh, and I have it for homemade guacamole too.

PackRatTDI · **^ Top** #8 12.19.2007

Hey, if the US is going to violate NAFTA, then we have no right to point fingers at Mexico for doing the same.

hrdman2luv · **^ Top** #9 12.19.2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnocomot

Could you explain how "sticking it" to GM or GE would be good for anyone?

Who do you think GE and GM are?
Who owns GE and GM?
Do you have a clue?

If they block US exports, that means that Gm, and GE won't be able to carry supplys for their factories in Mexico. Therefore, they would have to either reopen plants and rehire imployees here to continue to make their products. And immediate increase in the US labor force.

Plus, they won't get no coal. Or deisel. In which we export to Mexico.

They won't do it though. Because the Democrats will buckle under pressure.

Jarlaxle · **^ Top** #10 12.19.2007

Hey, this is good! The first export they need to block is the millions upon millions of dollars being wired to Mexico. DEFINITELY stop that today!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Trucker Forum	Replies	Last Post
Chavez threatens to halt oil sales to US	Cybergal	News - NON Trucking News	20	02.13.2008 07.11 AM
counterfeit clothing imports	Cybergal	Truckers News	0	11.20.2007 08.18 AM
Mentally ill man threatens to shoot Bush	Cybergal	Politics	10	08.26.2007 08.44 PM
Shoppers offered few safeguards against 'Wild West' imports	jamwadmag	Politics	15	08.02.2007 10.52 AM
‘Madam’ threatens to name and shame	Cybergal	News - NON Trucking News	5	05.01.2007 08.19 PM

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum
Sponsored Links

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)