Truckers' Trucking Forum | Message Board | Discussion - The Premier Truck Drivers Forum!  

Trucker MySpace - Truckers Making Friends. Chicken Truckers Come Meet Other Truckers!

Good Trucking Jobs - Forget Those CRAP Trucking Jobs & Find A Good Trucking Job!




Go Back   Truckers' Trucking Forum | Message Board | Discussion > Truckers & Politics > Politics

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum
Sponsored Links

Important Truckers Forum Notice!

Politics Do Not Pass/Pass With Care. Today's truckers are far more educated and cognizant of the issues regarding politics due to the sharp increase in talk radio, and various trucking news media sources. Talk politics. Do truckers like politicians?

More Political Sites:

Political Forum Environment & Science Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  ^ Top   #1  
Old 03.08.2008
Brickman's Avatar
Trucker Forum STAFF
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: southeast WY
Trucker? 5 Years
Age: 34
Posts: 9,236
My Trucking Photos: 7

Thanks: 1,714
Thanked: 865 Times
Dems Brought change in 06, do we really want more of their kind of change?

In just over a year:


A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.


Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we're
seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) the cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value
evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by
$1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.




Pretty telling now isn't it? Do we really need more Democratic style change?
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians and diapers need to be changed often and for the same reason.

Its useless to argue with ignorance

Don't blame me, I didn't vote for the anti American crew.



Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #2  
Old 03.08.2008
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Trucker? 2 Years
Age: 41
Posts: 900
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
False Cause: the fallacy committed when an argument mistakenly attempt to establish a causal connection.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc
: (literally "after this, therefore because of this") the fallacy of arguing that one event was caused by another event merely because it occurred after that event.
    1. I.e., mere succession in time is not enough to establish causal connection. E.g., consider "Since hair always precedes the growth of teeth in babies, the growth of hair causes the growth of teeth."
This looks like its just talking points as these exact points were posted earlier in another thread.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #3  
Old 03.08.2008
Roadmedic's Avatar
"Jump Start"
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Trucker? 9 Years
Age: 50
Posts: 4,480
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 345
Thanked: 430 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brickman View Post
In just over a year:


A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.


Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we're
seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) the cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value
evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by
$1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.




Pretty telling now isn't it? Do we really need more Democratic style change?
You might like to return to the period prior to Bush.
Diesel was only .99 per gallon.
Unemployment was 4%

Consumer confidence has been in the decline the last 3 years.

The housing problem is not just limited to the Democratic congress. It has roots over many of the previous years.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #4  
Old 03.08.2008
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Trucker? 2 Years
Age: 41
Posts: 900
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmedic View Post
You might like to return to the period prior to Bush.
Diesel was only .99 per gallon.
Unemployment was 4%

Consumer confidence has been in the decline the last 3 years.

The housing problem is not just limited to the Democratic congress. It has roots over many of the previous years.
Not to mention that there were three landmark buildings standing in NYC prior to Bush, but not afterwards.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #5  
Old 03.08.2008
Roadmedic's Avatar
"Jump Start"
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Trucker? 9 Years
Age: 50
Posts: 4,480
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 345
Thanked: 430 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebel Patriot View Post
Not to mention that there were three landmark buildings standing in NYC prior to Bush, but not afterwards.

I don't believe it is fair to lay that on Bush. Those buildings have been a target for many years.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #6  
Old 03.08.2008
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 09.15.2008 07.59 PM
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Southwestern Michigan (Lawrence)
Posts: 2,182
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 13 Times
If you are going to go back, why not go back to Eisenhower when fuel was .25 cents per gallon. Or back to Chester A Arthur, when you really had no need to buy fuel at all.......

And our liberal loons can't count either. There were only two of those buildings that were possibly worthy of the title "Landmark". One of them was merely another relatively undistinguished office building in a town full of them.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #7  
Old 03.08.2008
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Trucker? 2 Years
Age: 41
Posts: 900
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmedic View Post
I don't believe it is fair to lay that on Bush. Those buildings have been a target for many years.
Well, by the logic employed by Brickman, it is.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #8  
Old 03.08.2008
Roadmedic's Avatar
"Jump Start"
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Trucker? 9 Years
Age: 50
Posts: 4,480
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 345
Thanked: 430 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burky View Post
If you are going to go back, why not go back to Eisenhower when fuel was .25 cents per gallon. Or back to Chester A Arthur, when you really had no need to buy fuel at all.......

And our liberal loons can't count either. There were only two of those buildings that were possibly worthy of the title "Landmark". One of them was merely another relatively undistinguished office building in a town full of them.

I did not just go back. Brickman made a reference to the increases caused by the Democrat congress election. I just referred to the last power change.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #9  
Old 03.08.2008
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Trucker? 2 Years
Age: 41
Posts: 900
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burky View Post
If you are going to go back, why not go back to Eisenhower when fuel was .25 cents per gallon. Or back to Chester A Arthur, when you really had no need to buy fuel at all.......

And our liberal loons can't count either. There were only two of those buildings that were possibly worthy of the title "Landmark". One of them was merely another relatively undistinguished office building in a town full of them.
Ah, another fallacy there Burky. Going all the way back. Take your pick. Straw man, exaggeration, avoiding the issue... a whole plethora of argumentative fallacies on your part.

All those buildings were part of the WTC Complex. There were several others too, DIRECTLY underneath 1 and 2 that bore the greatest collateral damage from debris and fire, yet they didn't collapse. Funny how that one across the street did, falling into its own footprint symetrically (even though some damage hit it asymetrically.)
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #10  
Old 03.08.2008
mongothetrucker's Avatar
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 04.13.2008 12.17 PM
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Luck, WI
Trucker? 16 Years
Age: 38
Posts: 12
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
The fact that the Democrats can change anything is false.

With Bush in the White House he can veto anything and it takes 2/3 majority to override the veto. The Dems only have a slight margin, so the only way they can change anything is with a Democrat in the White House.

So anybody that blames the Democrats with blanket statements, I just write off as a Hannity/Limbaugh lemming.
__________________
hippopotomonstrausesquippedaliophobia- A fear of large words

Reply With Quote
Reply

Truckers Forum Bookmarks - Like This Thread? Tell The World!

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board
Truckers Accessories


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Trucker Forum Replies Last Post
Change Kalamity Jane Politics 52 05.29.2008 12.52 AM
Looking for a change Ghostwriter Experienced Truckers' Advice 14 11.28.2007 07.08 PM
Giuliani: Dems Will Change Minds on Iraq firstcav Politics 0 10.30.2007 07.53 AM
HOS what would you change? tjgosurf Trucking Industry Regulations 40 09.12.2007 04.07 PM
HOS Change? trailboss Trucking Industry Regulations 1 08.30.2007 12.54 PM


.


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © The Truckers Report - Trucking Forum & Message Board - Truck Driver Discussion - Truck Forum

Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO