I was not aiming for similarity, quite the opposite. I was aiming to debunk your previous notation that "Buildings ALWAYS fall straight down", which is incorrect.

I hope they never call on you to count the fingers or toes on your children. The collapse begins with one PENTHOUSE, then the other PENTHOUSE and finally the rest of the building......takes just over 15 seconds.

THAT isn't what I said. Go back and re-read what I posted.....TWICE.

SO ####### WHAT if the photo only showed the upper floors on fire. ### #### claimed that there WAS NO ####### FIRE in the first place.

The damage from the debris of the collapse of WTC 1 took out about 25% of the front of the building. Look at the photos and video I posted

I see, CBS was in on it as well.

Okay.

__________________
Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them.-Albert Einstein

"When things look bad, and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb mad dog mean. Cause if you lose your head and you give up, then you neither live nor win, that's just the way it is." --the Outlaw Josey Wales

The penthouse collapsed in slow motion? Because the bulk of the building collapsed in 5 seconds. Anyone can see that, except you.

Anyone out there willing to stand up and agree with roadkill that this building took 16 seconds to collapse?

Using your own video....16 seconds? My youtube counter must be off.
[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Truck Forum Link.

__________________
.

Why don't you stay away from conspiracy theory websites and real Popular Mechanics Investigation.
Never mind, we all know you can hardly get your ball-cap on as it is.

Sorry I guess i got side tracked, first of all calm down, second of all I'm talking about all 3 buildings in the series entirety, not just building 7. My point is that without demolition the buildings would have had resistance, or as you put it another "force" at work causing the top (Damaged) portions to take the path of least resistance, which, unless the bottom floors were blown out deliberately would not have been straight down.

I understood what you said, but it doesn't change the point that i was trying to make. Those buildings were deliberate demolitions and still did not fall straight down, why? Because the bottom floors were undamaged, and in-tact.. Causing the buildings to fall sideways (not straight down).

basically my outlook is this; the top floors of the first two towers were damaged, but the buildings were built with modular units, meaning there was 3 pieces which each had x amount of floors that were free standing objects all by themselves, just stacked on top of one another with a solid "core" that went up through the center of each building with floors built around it. The modular floors that were damaged by the plane and sat in flames would have possibly fallen, and perhaps even the modular unit above that if there was one (not looking at specific floors etc), but they would have fallen sideways, and not straight down, unless the bottom floors were destroyed first.

As far as building 7 is concerned, it does not matter if the penthouses (The top floor) collapsed an hour before the rest of the building, it doesn't change the fact that physics are at work yet again. It would seem to me that the entire building collapse was actually initiated by the penthouse (Again, the top floor) but is that even possible? I beleive that all those subsequent floors would surely be able to support the weight of just one floor at the top, right? Even while considering the penthouse at the very top, a building does not fall that quickly or in that organized of a manner unless the bottom floors are given way on their own. If it was caused by the weight of the above floors you would see a stutter between each floor as it collapsed on top, and there would be a pause. It's quite possible that it would have stopped mid-way, there are many determining factors in such a debate, but I still hold the fact that there were outside forces to blame not related to the airplane strikes, and it's not just because of the manner in which these buildings fell; but also the other information that has been public for a very long time, and simply ignored by the majority, which would be several very high ranking physics professors from various universities finding traces of "Nano-Thermite" on the molten steel. Thermite is an incindiary, meaning it burns hot enough to 'melt' object rather than explode, it would have been perfect for a job like this as you can't see as many squibs or blasts, and anything and everything that gets in it's way is literally burned into a ball of molten muck.

Airplane fires do not create perfect diagonal cuts in thick steel support beams, or leave molten steel laying around for hours (Even days) after it was all said and done... Do they?

And never before in history had 19 Arabs piloted fully fueled jet aircraft into buildings.