![]() |
Trucker MySpace
- Truckers Making Friends. Chicken Truckers Come Meet Other Truckers! |
| |||||||
| Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum | |||||
| |
| Report A BAD Trucking Company Here Post your comments/discussions on a bad trucking company to let fellow drivers know about them before they make a mistake! Try adding the trucking company name as a topic first to draw attention to that company. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rating: | Display Modes |
| |||
| One thing I dont like about JB is that I can tell theyre trying to hire the cheapest labor possible. All the terminals I go to they have foreigners doing most of the menial jobs like checking your tires or checking you in and out at the security gate. I have ran more miles this month though, around 2,500 a week. They sent us all a message directly from Craig Harper (the main guy) telling us that we were going to be getting more miles because they got more contracts or whatever for more loads. Lets see how long this lasts. |
| |||
| god i love jb i did three and a half weeks with them ...went for the big bucks ....or so i thought 1st week 1600 miles 2nd week 983 miles 3rd week 866 miles god these people suck |
| |||
| Maybe JB ain't paying anything on those 800 trucks that are sitting. I mean, it aint like Frtlnr can sell them anyway, if they take them back. I remember when USX tried to turn in their trucks and Frtlnr did not want them back and wanted USX to put them back on the road. If people remember, USX used to run steers on the drives, but had to change them out when they turned them in. There were lots of grumbling tire changers after that one. |
| ||||
| Fixed costs have to be paid Big blue, does JB actually own those trucks or are they leasing/renting them? If they lease them, they still have to pay the rent on 'em if they're pretty new. If they own them, they still have to pay for things like insurance, registration, that sort of thing for each rig. How does this cost get covered? By the trucks that are actually running. The problem is the fixed costs of these parked rigs can overwhelm profits pretty quickly. And stockholders would be the first to sound the alarm and demand those trucks move. I suspect some sort of welfare is being paid to these companies, absolutely. Probably in the form of some sort of tax relief. The fixed costs of sitting trucks can't be covered by the low profits of the remaining trucks, if trucking company profits are indeed low like trucking companies claim, when a company has 25% or more of its trucks just sitting around for days or weeks on end. This situation would be exactly the same as the government giving subsidies to farmers to not actually produce milk or grain or whatever, even though those farmers are in business to do exactly that. Some farmers in the midwest get subsidies of several hundred thousands of dollars to do nothing, so it's in their interest not to produce. If trucking companies get subsidies (tax breaks of some kind?) for their empty cleaned-outs, the subsidies may be more than the profits they'd make on those trucks if they were actually being used to make deliveries, meaning it would be in their interest to make sure at least some trucks are sitting idle. They just have to "convince" the drivers of those trucks to quit through bad treatment. I just can't break away from this idea, my brethren. I've seen too much evidence to believe the driver turnover meat grinder is just a combination of random market-driven events. Something else is at work here. Besides, when I was driving, I used to see a certain number of cleaned-out trucks at many a terminal relative to the size of the company. I'll call it "Tip's Constant"--the ratio of empty cleaned outs to the total number of trucks. It was suspicously constant. Never more. Never less. Just like it would be if they were getting some sort of subsidy. And all the company whining about this imaginary "driver shortage" would help their cause as well. That whining would help keep the government gravy rolling in. But maybe I'm wrong on this one. Maybe there is no sort of "subsidy" being paid. Maybe these trucking companies can get away with having all those empty trucks sitting idle because EVERY company has them. But even then, one company would realize that it could use that fact to its advantage. It could make sure all its rigs are running at all times by cutting its turnover to 25% or even lower from 125%, 150%, whatever.
__________________ --Paved Dudley-- Yeah I drive a Swift truck And that means one thing It means she's slow It's a typical company truck It's just all show and no go I'm gettin' passed by Yella And even Overnite I'm gettin' passed by ever' body in sight 46 days on the road And I'm not gettin' home tonight No, my hometown's nowhere in sight And if you think I'm pissed off You're right 46 days on the road And I'm not gettin' home tonight Love pissing off those trucking company insiders. Last edited by Tip; 04.05.2007 at 09.35 PM.. |
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ Armodin Storm CrowThe Storm is coming are you ready ? |
| |||
| It was explained to me once at USX that each truck had to run 2300-2500 miles a week just to break even. Which might explain why they dropped 500 trucks right before I left there. They no longer needed them, due to a quarter of their frt now being run on the rail. I never worked at JB but I do know that the last time I put in a on-line app, which was'nt even for JB. I had 5 of their recruiters call me up the same day saying I did. So it must be quite competive at JB's recruiting central. |
| ||||
| i can't figure out all the ranting and raving about jb. is it from experience with them or just from what you all hear from other people. remember you gotta take what people say with a grain of salt. i personally did a tour with jb and made great money. my biggest moan about them is the trucks are slow. every otr company is the same out there in one aspect or the other they just drive with a different logo on the side. we are all out there trying to make the almighty dollar and keep afloat and our heads above water and do what we enjoy doing. and by the way i'm on my second stint with jb now. good miles and they keep me running. i sat once but thats when i changed fleet managers. been running like a mad dog since then. yes jb is full of #### but honestly who isn't. if your not getting home every night they all suck big hairy rat #####. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| bad trucking company, jb hunt, jb hunt sucks |
| Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board | |||||
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Trucker Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| J.b Hunt | peanut | JB Hunt | 3 | 2 Weeks Ago 12.12 PM |
| j.b. hunt | binder_boy | Report A BAD Trucking Company Here | 12 | 3 Weeks Ago 07.45 PM |
| J.B. HUNT - Lowell, Ar.? | erin | Motor Carrier Questions - The Inside Scoop | 30 | 07.23.2009 10.12 AM |
| JB Hunt | pikr4321 | Report A BAD Trucking Company Here | 29 | 10.06.2008 12.00 PM |
| JB Hunt | faxpaper1 | Report A BAD Trucking Company Here | 8 | 02.28.2008 07.07 PM |
Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy Statement.