Swift Transportation Company, Inc. - Phoenix, Az. - Page 64 - Truckers' Trucking Forum | Message Board

vols021 · **^ Top** #**631** 05.02.2008

Leave these Swifties alone. I need them. I follow them into the truck stops so that I can get a parking space. They always seem to clear the O/O's out when they enter the lot.

rdonovan1 · **^ Top** #**632** 05.03.2008

The driver can inspect it all he wants, but it is ultimately the responsibility of the motor carrier to make sure that the repairs are done. That is the law.

It is the drivers responsibility to do their pre-trip and post-trip inspections as well as to report what they find to the company.

After that it is the responsibility of the company to make sure that the proper repairs are done as it is their equipment and their ultimate responsibility.

We are not mechanics. We are drivers and we get paid to drive the truck. We do not get paid to play the role of mechanic for the company. If the company wanted us to be mechanics, then they would have hired us to be mechanics instead of drivers.

If you want to be a mechanic, then stop driving and be a mechanic. If you want to drive, then act like a driver and do what the FMCSR expects of you as a driver.

If the company does not like what the FMCSR says, then let that be their problem and let them be the ones to get in trouble for not following the FMCSR. Don't follow the lead of the company. Always go by what the FMCSR says first, then go by what the compay says.

If what the company says is not inline with the FMCSR, then let take appropriate action even if that means quitting the company and going somewhere else.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MGASSEL

I have to agree with desert son on this as well as others that has said that it is the drivers job to notify swift of tires, and any other repairs that are needed on the trailers or trucks. I know that it is probaly in your drivers manual and you were probaly explained that in orentation.

I know that it is a rule that you the driver must inspect the equipment daily if not twice daily.

When I worked for May Trucking some of their drivers were lazy if not just idiots they did not properly report the need of repairs on the trailers I was allways picking up trailers that needed tires, mud flaps, lights.

The way I handled the issue is I refused to move the trailer before the repairs were completed.

One of the trailers I was suppose to pick up was preloaded.
The customer has a no parking / sleeping etc on their property rule but I ignored that rule because the trailer was not legal to be on the road.
They did not say anything to me but I did send a breakdown macro to get the repairs done.

At May Trucking they had guy's that walked arround and checked tires on all trucks and trailers in the yard. Now that did take care of some trailers but there were alot of trailers at customers locations that were never checked on.

Now I have a question for anyone that think the company should be inspecting the trailers.
If you pick up a reefer load and the reefer is not running as it should do you go ahead and just pull the load and risk loosing it or notify the company of the needed repairs?

If you pull or drive equipment that needs repairs and get into an accident who is to blame for the accident you or the company?

In short if anyone thinks that the company that they work for is responsible to do the drivers job on the daily inspections then you should not be behind the wheel of the truck.

Road Dog · **^ Top** #**633** 05.03.2008

Take this for what its worth. I am an older driver with 15 years experience,now retired.I have done a little of everything from railroad freight,over the road truckin,and local truckin. I did do a short stint with Swift,four months worth. To me Swift is the bottom of the barrel. In my four months with them it seems like every day was a bad experience. I would not reccomend them to my worst enemy. I realize that there are some Swift drivers who have been there a long time and enjoy what they are doing.I would imagine they have never driven for a good company,so they have nothing to compare Swift with. I have driven for some good companies,and some bad ones,but in all fairness Swift was the worst.Oh yeah and being retired and always busy,I have much better things to do than just sit at the computer and run down a truckin company.Its just that some info is worth passing on.

pawpaw · **^ Top** #**634** 05.04.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdonovan1

The driver can inspect it all he wants, but it is ultimately the responsibility of the motor carrier to make sure that the repairs are done. That is the law.

It is the drivers responsibility to do their pre-trip and post-trip inspections as well as to report what they find to the company.

Problem I found is most drivers did not want to inspect the trailer and thus left the problem for someone else. More than I care to count I picked up t-called trailers with tires that were so bad that I lost time getting them repaired. It was obvious the previous driver(s) didn't care enough to report the problem. Yes, it is the shop's job to fix trailers when they are made aware of the problem. However, the way Swift runs freight a trailer may not see a terminal in many months. Thus it IS the driver's responsibility to take the trailer to the nearest shop when they find a problem. Most drivers though do not really do a pre- or post-trip and there in lies the problem.

Ohnoo · **^ Top** #**635** 05.04.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdonovan1

The driver can inspect it all he wants, but it is ultimately the responsibility of the motor carrier to make sure that the repairs are done. That is the law.

No the law is that IS the drivers responsibility to make sure that all OOS repairs have been done before using the equipment. The driver doesn't have to make the repairs personally but they do have to make sure they have been done before driving off. Notice the three signature lines at the bottom of vehicle reports, Signature of driver making report, Signature of mechanic making repairs, and lastly Signature of driver reviewing repairs.

IH Scout · **^ Top** #**636** 05.04.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ohnoo

No the law is that is IS the drivers responsibility to make sure that all OOS repairs have been done before using the equipment. The driver doesn't have to make the repairs personally but the do have to make sure they have been done before driving off. Notice the three signature lines at the bottom of vehicle reports, Signature of driver making report, Signature of mechanic making repairs, and lastly Signature of driver reviewing repairs.

He is correct its the drivers responsibility to make sure the trailer he is pulling is up to snuff, if repairs are needed to make the trailer safe, he has an avenue with the company to get those repairs taken care of. It is no more the carriers place to do this than it is to make sure my log book is legal.

Tip · **^ Top** #**637** 05.05.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdonovan1

Good news.

I beat Swift today in an unemployment law hearing that I had with them. They were attempting to claim that I committed misconduct due to some citations, but they lost the case because they were not prepared and their attorney pissed off the judge so bad that the judge told the attorney to hang up the telephone during the hearing.

Swift withdrew their appeal of my unemployment claim and by law that automatically results in a ruling in my favor and against Swift.

I guess that just kind of proves what we all knew all along and that is Swift really does not know what they are doing.

I guess that you could say that they have a lot of idiots working for them from the top down for the most part.

Congratulations on the win. Maybe some other drivers who've been burned by those guys will follow in your footsteps and do the right thing.

lost-in-montana · **^ Top** #**638** 05.09.2008

my experiece the last 2 weeks with the dm i have has been horrible. i totally cannot stand this guy.im going to try to switch to a new dm. but my first 2 weeks solo has made me get a bad attitude towards the whole swift thing.like i said im going to try for a new dm (because this one is a friggin jerk all the way). he is a dm out of lewiston terminal. wont say his name but most people will know who i am talking about. my luck i drew the jerk that the other drivers warned me to stay away from.i hope it gets better but hey swift get a clue. driver managers that are ######## make for poor performance. please get rid of this dm. he has no buisness in the position.

pawpaw · **^ Top** #**639** 05.09.2008

Montana, sorry to hear about the dm issues. You probably got him because they assign dm's based on the number of drivers they have on their board. Since he appears to be one of the "winners" that most ask to leave, unfortunately, he will probably be the first dm new drivers in Lewiston will have to deal with.

Remember, though, he has tenure and the way you go about asking for a new dm can affect the outcome. Go about it diplomatically. Just tell them that you two are not compatible. Don't talk about him the way you have here (we understand but company management will look at it differently). At the right time (after you get a new dm and it appears to be working) take time to talk with the terminal manager about this dm. Do it calmly and professionally and the terminal manager, if he is worth his salt, will take action to correct the situation.

Tip · **^ Top** #**640** 05.10.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Road Dog

Take this for what its worth. I am an older driver with 15 years experience,now retired.I have done a little of everything from railroad freight,over the road truckin,and local truckin. I did do a short stint with Swift,four months worth. To me Swift is the bottom of the barrel. In my four months with them it seems like every day was a bad experience. I would not reccomend them to my worst enemy. I realize that there are some Swift drivers who have been there a long time and enjoy what they are doing.I would imagine they have never driven for a good company,so they have nothing to compare Swift with. I have driven for some good companies,and some bad ones,but in all fairness Swift was the worst.Oh yeah and being retired and always busy,I have much better things to do than just sit at the computer and run down a truckin company. It's just that some info is worth passing on.

Be careful, RoadDog. Some people here will claim that the bad experience you had at Swifty was YOUR fault. But we both know....

I agree with you. There are better things to do than sit at a computer bashing trucking companies. And I agree that some info is worth passing on, even to those who are ungrateful. But the sheer volume of good info that is worth passing on means we have to sit at a computer bashing trucking companies if that info is to be passed on. Life's a #####, I guess.

To those I've helped I say "You're welcome."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Trucker Forum	Replies	Last Post
Knight Transportation, Inc. - Phoenix, Az.	white horse	Report A BAD Trucking Company Here	156	2 Weeks Ago 08.11 AM
Swift Transportation, Fairly Good Company So Far	JAMES JACOB JORDAN	Swift	14	09.21.2008 08.46 PM
Swift Transportation Company, Inc. - Phoenix, Az.	RoadWarrior666	Discuss Your Favorite Trucking Company Here	317	06.27.2008 09.55 PM
Swift Transportation Company, Inc. - Phoenix, Az.?	Stonewall	Motor Carrier Questions - The Inside Scoop	60	05.02.2008 12.16 AM
Knight Transportation, Inc. - Phoenix, Az.	KnightRider	Discuss Your Favorite Trucking Company Here	20	07.02.2007 11.38 AM

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum
Sponsored Links

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (1 members and 3 guests)
Windjammer2