Truckers' Trucking Forum | Largest CDL Truck Driver Message Board - The Premier Truck Drivers Forum!  

Go Back   Truckers' Trucking Forum | Largest CDL Truck Driver Message Board > Good & Bad Trucking Companies > Teamsters, OOIDA, NAFTA

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum

Teamsters, OOIDA, NAFTA Teamsters, OOIDA, NAFTA news here. Are you a member of the Teamsters, OOIDA or another Organization involved with trucking or transportation? What are the good and bad sides to Unions? Discuss the finer points of Unions or Organizations here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  ^ Top   #31  
Old 02.10.2009
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 5 Days Ago 06.41 AM
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Midland WA
Trucker? 19 Years
Age: 47
Posts: 1,017
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked: 204 Times
Quote:
My wife and stepdaughter work for the USPS . They have belonged to National Association of Letter Carriers and United Postal Workers unions . The USPS is one example of where unions are an absolute necessity . Postal management are slave drivers and try to use cheap casual help rather than give work to permanent workers . Even with a union grievances have to be constantly filed when workers' rights are abused
Absolutely necessary? Hardly they have to hire out casuals because they lose money every year just like Amtrak.

I remember when you would go years in between postal rate increases yet now they want to raise them every other year because of the cost of legacy payments and Unions who strive for low productivity and high pay.

The USPS is another dinosaur like the newspapers. E-mail and on line bill paying along with competition by superior carriers who have to be conscious of customer service and get the package to you in 1 piece. Gov will not bail them out like they keep doing with the USPS.

Postal Services Reports $384 Million Loss (2/5/2009 2:30:00 PM)Post Office Asks to Cut a Delivery Day(1/28/2009 4:00:00 PM)Post Office Is $2.8 Billion in Red (11/14/2008 8:00:00 AM)[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Truck Forum Link. (8/6/2008 3:30:00 PM)

Last edited by Cybergal; 02.10.2009 at 04.02 PM.. Reason: To many links in post
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #32  
Old 02.10.2009
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 5 Days Ago 06.41 AM
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Midland WA
Trucker? 19 Years
Age: 47
Posts: 1,017
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked: 204 Times
Quote:
I don't know that Lilbit is pro union,...But I do know she does what a moderator does on a web forum,...She moderates,.....And she does a fine job of it...
Well I don't think I questioned this mods competency in being a moderator. So the purpose of the attack and gang up and cheerleading escapes me, except that you are pro-union also and you where thanked by the mod. So the proof is in the pudding.

I really don't need someone following me around misrepresenting my posts by saying that I am attacking posters by having a opinion that is not pro Union.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #33  
Old 02.10.2009
Cybergal's Avatar
Truck Forum Supporter
 
Last Seen: 04.16.2009 05.42 AM
Member Since: Oct 2008
Posts: 13,838
My Trucking Photos: 27

Thanks: 2,066
Thanked: 2,575 Times
My Truckers Blog : 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigblue19 View Post
Well I don't think I questioned this mods competency in being a moderator. So the purpose of the attack and gang up and cheerleading escapes me, except that you are pro-union also and you where thanked by the mod. So the proof is in the pudding.

I really don't need someone following me around misrepresenting my posts by saying that I am attacking posters by having a opinion that is not pro Union.

THAN I suggest you find a more suitable board to post on ... because this union forum is for discussion and not hatred.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cybergal For This Useful Post:
DmpTrkDrvr (02.13.2009), Lilbit (02.11.2009), RickG (02.10.2009), walleye (02.10.2009)
  ^ Top   #34  
Old 02.10.2009
RickG's Avatar
Truck Forum Supporter
 
Last Seen: 2 Weeks Ago 01.15 AM
Member Since: Jul 2008
Trucker? No Answer
Posts: 7,645
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 526
Thanked: 2,822 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigblue19 View Post
Absolutely necessary? Hardly they have to hire out casuals because they lose money every year just like Amtrak.

I remember when you would go years in between postal rate increases yet now they want to raise them every other year because of the cost of legacy payments and Unions who strive for low productivity and high pay.

The USPS is another dinosaur like the newspapers. E-mail and on line bill paying along with competition by superior carriers who have to be conscious of customer service and get the package to you in 1 piece. Gov will not bail them out like they keep doing with the USPS.

Postal Services Reports $384 Million Loss (2/5/2009 2:30:00 PM)Post Office Asks to Cut a Delivery Day(1/28/2009 4:00:00 PM)Post Office Is $2.8 Billion in Red (11/14/2008 8:00:00 AM)[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Truck Forum Link. (8/6/2008 3:30:00 PM)
Your statements make no sense . You give no logical reason why unions aren't necessary . Rather , you confirm the need for union protection because of poor management . Hire out casuals ? That has been done in violation of contract and the USPS paid millions in settlements because of it to local after local . [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Truck Forum Link. . The union would have a suit filed over the use of casuals at a local in one part of the country and the USPS would continue using casuals in other locals in other parts of the country . All the locals sued and won .
Now if the other carriers are so superior why is UPS beginning a program to have USPS carriers pick up UPS returns to be brought to the post office for UPS to pick up . As far as getting packages delivered in one piece I've seen more UPS and FedEx trucks on their side with packages scattered on the highway than USPS trucks . We know you opinions aren't going to change but you have a right to express your opinion . But if you think your opinions are convincing ...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RickG For This Useful Post:
walleye (02.10.2009)
  ^ Top   #35  
Old 02.10.2009
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 03.29.2009 07.32 PM
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Monroe, WA
Trucker? 2 Years
Posts: 22
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked: 7 Times
Excavator

"Well the Labor Dept would disagree"

I got my figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. I'm sure you'll find some way to twist those, though.

I am not trying to defend all of the "bad" unions have done, I know this first hand because I worked in manufacturing and in aerospace, where unions are faltering. I worked non-union for most of my career, and decided to give hem a shot after listening to all of the anti-union zealots and their diatribes about them, go figure!!!! Besides, companies, I have found, can be as EVIL as any other organization out there, PERIOD.

As much as some people say unions should be done away with because they are not needed; they won't be, because some of us don't care what they want. For us, it's not so much a question of "Do we need unions?", as is "Do we want unions?". My company is not public sector and has non-union competition. But, unions have a stronghold in certain areas of heavy construction in which the biggest and most capable contractors are, you guessed it, UNION!!!
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #36  
Old 02.10.2009
Light Load Member
 
Last Seen: 01.30.2010 09.59 PM
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Fontana, ca
Trucker? 10 Years
Age: 49
Posts: 292
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 3
Thanked: 59 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooney View Post
That's not what you said, you said "most companies".

All companies are only as good as YOU make them. Some folks are content at JB or Swift, others won't work for any of them. If it is your opinion that only union shops are worthy of your presence, that's fine, that's your choice.

It just doesn't make it factual.
Since this is a trucking website, He is correct in pointing out the trucking aspect. When people here talk about unions, they are talking about the trucking industry unions. Why would you think that they would be talking about some other type of work? That makes no sence at all.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #37  
Old 02.11.2009
Lilbit's Avatar
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 07.02.2009 03.35 PM
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Trucker? EX-8 Years
Age: 42
Posts: 6,838
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 2,544
Thanked: 1,672 Times
My Truckers Blog : 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigblue19 View Post
Well I don't think I questioned this mods competency in being a moderator. So the purpose of the attack and gang up and cheerleading escapes me, except that you are pro-union also and you where thanked by the mod. So the proof is in the pudding.

I really don't need someone following me around misrepresenting my posts by saying that I am attacking posters by having a opinion that is not pro Union.
AND for the record, I am neither PRO nor ANTI union, or perhaps it's both.
__________________
Dynamite comes in small packages, Nitro comes in smaller ones, take your pick!


Lo there do I see my father
Lo there do I see my mother
and my sisters and brothers
Lo there do I see the line of my people
back to the beginning
Lo they do call to me
They bid me to take my place
In the halls of Valhalla
Where the brave may live forever.
From the movie 'The 13th Warrior'
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #38  
Old 02.12.2009
Cybergal's Avatar
Truck Forum Supporter
 
Last Seen: 04.16.2009 05.42 AM
Member Since: Oct 2008
Posts: 13,838
My Trucking Photos: 27

Thanks: 2,066
Thanked: 2,575 Times
My Truckers Blog : 16
Striking union offers to return to Oak Harbor Freight
2/12/09
Quote:
The union representing nearly 600 workers striking for more than four months at Auburn's Oak Harbor Freight Lines Inc. offered Thursday to return to work unconditionally.
"There's no winners here," said Al Hobart, vice president of the Western Regional of the Teamsters International Union, in an interview Thursday.
Oak Harbor Freight Lines spokesman Mike Hobby said federal law gives the company five days to decide whether to accept the unconditional offer and, if it does, to organize the workers' return.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/busine...kharbor13.html
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cybergal For This Useful Post:
Earl (02.27.2009), RickG (02.13.2009)
  ^ Top   #39  
Old 02.13.2009
RickG's Avatar
Truck Forum Supporter
 
Last Seen: 2 Weeks Ago 01.15 AM
Member Since: Jul 2008
Trucker? No Answer
Posts: 7,645
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 526
Thanked: 2,822 Times
"No winners here " .That from a teamster official . Another teamster official said " Nobody wins in a strike" when workers ended a strike against Waste Management . Wouldn't another way of putting that be "Everybody loses in a strike " ?
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #40  
Old 02.27.2009
Cybergal's Avatar
Truck Forum Supporter
 
Last Seen: 04.16.2009 05.42 AM
Member Since: Oct 2008
Posts: 13,838
My Trucking Photos: 27

Thanks: 2,066
Thanked: 2,575 Times
My Truckers Blog : 16
Oak harbor freight lines retaliates against returning workers

Oak Harbor Freight Lines retaliates against returning workers
2/27/09
Quote:
Oak Harbor Freight Lines is attempting to fire thirteen workers, represented by the teamsters, and illegally eliminate workers’ healthcare and pension plans after the union decided to end a five-month strike last week. Over 500 workers at oak harbor in oregon, idaho and washington originally went on strike on september 22, 2008 to protest the company’s violations of federal labor laws. Prior to that, the oak harbor’s employees had never gone on strike.
The latest unlawful move by oak harbor could incite a new strike just as the company is attempting to recover from the 157-day strike that triggered widespread service disruptions and cost oak harbor more than half of its business.
http://www.teamster.org/content/oak-...urning-workers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
teamsters, truck driver news, truck drivers news, trucker news, truckers news, trucking company news, trucking industry news, trucking news, union news

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Trucker Forum Replies Last Post
The WORST Lease Purchase Agreement I've Ever Seen TurboTrucker Experienced Truckers' Advice 45 10.26.2009 04.23 PM
Prime, Inc. - Springfield, Mo.? skullitor Prime 70 02.28.2009 07.53 AM
Truckers threatening to strike Cybergal Truckers Strike Forum 8 03.30.2008 09.43 PM
4-1-08 Strike Rock&Roll Truckers Strike Forum 4 03.24.2008 05.09 PM
copy of newsletter from internettruckstop....anyone else see the problem here? broncrider Truckers News 0 03.11.2008 04.55 PM


.


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © TheTruckersReport.com - Trucking Forum & Message Board - Truck Driver Discussion - Truck Forum

Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy Statement.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO