do you need hazmat endorsement to haul motor oil in a dry van.

Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by buck and a half, Jul 9, 2007.

  1. buck and a half

    buck and a half <strong>Mr. Miles & Miles with Many Smiles</strong

    Messages:
    775
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Location:
    madison,me
    do you need hazmat to haul a dry van load of motor oils. some say yes,company says no. let me know what it really is,thks.
     
  2. Brickman

    Brickman Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,921
    Thanks Received:
    12,093
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Location:
    WY
    Probably not if its a couple cases of it. For example Wal Mart loads all kinds of stuff on their trailers going to the stores from the DC. There is usually a little haz on all of them, but below the amount required to have a haz endorsement. But if you are hauling a full load then yes you do have to have the endorsement.
     
  3. tjgosurf

    tjgosurf <strong>New Driver Helper</strong>

    Messages:
    404
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    From a shipping stand point its a no. I actually had to break out my 49CFR to find this answer, according to 173.150, I assumed it was petro oil, pg 3. Unless shipped by aircraft they are exempt from packaging requirements, as long as they meet this requirement, they are in a container of less than 1.3 gallons each, consisting of a strong outer packaging. And each box cannot excede the weight of 66 pounds each. And as far as I know, no hazmat declaration, no hazmat endorsement needed.
     
  4. buck and a half

    buck and a half <strong>Mr. Miles & Miles with Many Smiles</strong

    Messages:
    775
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Location:
    madison,me
    thanks,I found the answer to be no by my company and the shipper and drivers that load these things everyday at citco petro co,I have 5 gallon buckets,one whole load of lubricating oil,does not fall under hazmat,I believe in the old days it used to be. No x or placards required. Thanks for the info.
     
  5. tjgosurf

    tjgosurf <strong>New Driver Helper</strong>

    Messages:
    404
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    So for your question in the future, if its a consumer commodity(what you would buy in a store), you do not need hazmat. Only bulk shipments. And next time give us a proper shipping name so I can find the right info. :)
     
  6. MACK E-6

    MACK E-6 Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,641
    Thanks Received:
    6,250
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    But he was referring to "MOTOR" oil. I could look for it in my ERG but I believe motor oil is considered flammable (Class 3). Packaging wouldn't matter, whether it's in 1 quart bottles, 5 gallon buckets, or 55 gallon drums. ANY hazmat that's part of the load has to be noted on the Bill of Lading, and ANY amount whatsoever will require the endorsement to have it on the truck.
     
  7. tjgosurf

    tjgosurf <strong>New Driver Helper</strong>

    Messages:
    404
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006

    You're wrong. Please become familiar with the 49 CFR. As it was my warehouse job to prepare BOL's, and I was trained by the government I may know what I speak of.
     
  8. Cybergal

    Cybergal Road Train Member

    Messages:
    6,261
    Thanks Received:
    2,362
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Doesn't matter if it's a full load or not...it's not considered hazmat.
     
  9. 30Below

    30Below Bobtail Member

    Messages:
    47
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Location:
    corvallis,or
    All hazmat types have a reportable quanity. if it is below the RQ you dont need a hazmat endorsment or placard to haul it. if the hazmat cargo is above the RQ it is the shippers responsibility to notify the driver, supply all proper documentation and labeling also the driver must have a hazmat license.
     
  10. 2xR

    2xR Medium Load Member

    Messages:
    365
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Location:
    Ol' North State
    I haul 5,000 gallons of new, and used, petroleum based lubrication, and hydraulic oils in tankers on many occasions. It is non-hazardous per the regulations.

    Yes, it will burn, but the flash points are so high it is almost considered inert. One machining factory I service has a mote around the the production area specifically to catch the oil used to cool the metal cutting process. They store the stuff until their tanks get full, then I show up with a vac-tanker and remove it from the tanks, and vacuum out the mote. The machinist smoke on the job and there are cigarette butts in the oil. I'm satisfied it is hard to ignite.

    I'll then haul it to a pit where it is solidified with sawdust. After that occurs we haul it in a dump trailer to a alternatively fueled power generation plant where it is burned as fuel. During this ride it is classified as a class 9 hazard, UN3077.

    Much of the material classifications are determined by the producers, or generators. If they declare a substance, that they define the characteristics of, "non-hazardous", then the carrier can only proceed under the assumption that it is non-hazardous. I mean if I go to a shipper and get loaded with a clear liquid, and the shipper's paperwork states it is water, then I proceed based on the assumption it is water. Who knows? It might be alcohol, or nitroglycerin.
     
    airforcetoo Thanks this.