Uh-oh,I was hoping it wasnt the truck this time.

Well that may somewhat work if it blocked just data and only while on driving. I know I would be into it Not because I text or browse the net but I use my phone as a radio. Also what to stop one from bypassing that by using their tablet or so other hot spot device.

 

A 4 wheeled doesn't weigh 80 grand

 

FCC says that's illegal

 

Maybe if drivers got their head out of their ### and started paying attention it wouldn't be necessary to add yet another cost to the vehicle and add more government control

 

Um

Ummm...excuse me sir....you will need to refrain from making sense.

 

The accident the OP was referring to, the driver was cited for reckless driving the day prior, and has a not-so-good record... http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/...75-crash-wanted-drug-charge-wisconsin/312368/

 

Loser.

 

He was also arrested in 2013 for drug related offenses and has an active warrant in Wisconsin.

 

This type driver probably had a significant number of "call-ins" to the carrier. I suspect he was known to be a lose-cannon but was allowed to truck anyway. Probably plenty of blame to go around allowing this dangerous individual to remain in a truck.

 

This driver has a drug related warrant for his arrest from 2013 in Wisconsin. I wonder how long he's been driving for for COOL RUNNING EXPRESS? This company only runs about 10 trucks. If he went to work for this company after a warrant was issued for FTA then this company did not run a complete background investigation on him before they hired him. An outstanding warrant like that goes into the NCIC database and would have been easy to find.