New York Times: Truckers Resist Rules on Sleep, Despite Risks of Drowsy Driving

Discussion in 'Truckers News' started by Rockin&Rollin, Jun 17, 2014.

  1. Rockin&Rollin

    Rockin&Rollin Heavy Load Member

    798
    6,325
    Mar 6, 2011
    Orlando Florida
    0
    :biggrin_2556: This issue is making the big-time, the New York Times! ...


    New York Times: Truckers Resist Rules on Sleep, Despite Risks of Drowsy Driving

    The tractor-trailer set off at 2:30 a.m. from Springfield, Mo., the usual time and place. Nearly 11 hours later, along the Will Rogers Turnpike in Oklahoma, fatigue caught up.

    At mile marker 321.5, near the town of Miami, the semi plowed into a line of cars stopped on the highway. Ten people were killed. The 76-year-old truck driver, who survived, had probably fallen asleep, federal investigators later concluded.

    What is remarkable about these events, which took place five years ago this month, is how common such accidents are. For decades, federal authorities have tried to ensure that truck drivers get adequate rest. But in a business that lives by the clock, miles mean money. Commercial truck operators have resisted, arguing, in effect, that Washington cannot regulate sleep.

    But now sleep-deprived driving — an open secret among truckers — has once again come to the fore, after the June 7 accident involving the comedian Tracy Morgan on a dark stretch of the New Jersey Turnpike 45 miles south of New York City. Prosecutors say the Walmart truck driver whose tractor-trailer slammed into a van carrying Mr. Morgan, critically injuring him and killing another passenger, had not slept in more than 24 hours.

    Drowsy driving is a leading cause of crashes and highway fatalities, according to federal officials. Just this month, driver fatigue has been cited in deadly accidents in Madison County, Ohio; Austin, Tex.; and Marseilles, Ill. In all, more than 30,000 people die on highways annually in the United States; crashes involving large trucks are responsible for one in seven of those deaths.

    Federal rules last year reduced the maximum workweek for truckers to 70 hours, from 82 hours. Drivers who hit this limit can start their workweek only after a mandatory 34-hour resting period. Under the new rules, this “restart” must include two periods between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m., to allow drivers to rest at least two nights a week. Drivers cannot drive for more than 11 hours a day and must have a 30-minute break in their schedule.

    But the trucking industry has been battling to get the new nighttime-break regulations repealed. On June 6, Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, pushed an amendment through the Senate Appropriations Committee that would freeze the rules, pending further studies. Ms. Collins said the administration had failed to take into account that the new rules would put more trucks on the roads during peak traffic hours.

    Trucking officials and executives also said that drivers needed to be afforded maximum flexibility in their work and should not be told when to rest.

    “Many of the anti-truck groups have mischaracterized the extent to which fatigue is a part of our traffic problem,” said Bill Graves, the president of the American Trucking Associations and a former governor of Kansas. “I don’t know how the federal government polices sleep,” he added.

    Brian Fielkow, president of Jetco Delivery, a company based in Houston that operates about 100 trucks, said the hours regulations that went into effect last year reduced productivity in the industry by putting more trucks on the road in times of heavy traffic without addressing the safety issues.

    “The new rules certainly didn’t protect against the tragedy we’re talking about today,” he said.

    To safety advocacy groups, however, Ms. Collins’s amendment would be a dangerous setback. Fred McLuckie, director of the department of federal legislation at the Teamsters union, said efforts to roll back fatigue regulations come after 25 years of work to reach an effective compromise on driving time. Mr. McLuckie said that not only has fatigue long been underreported at accident scenes, it has also become a more pressing issue in recent years.

    “Congestion on the highways is greater than ever, there are more vehicles on the road than ever before, and drivers have to be more attentive than ever,” Mr. McLuckie said. “Fatigue is even more of a concern now than it has been, and drivers need to get proper rest to do the job that they do.”

    Henry Jasny, the vice president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, acknowledged that it was often difficult to find evidence that fatigue directly caused an accident. But repealing the rule would mean that drivers would most likely spend longer weeks on the road and could possibly become more fatigued.

    “If it weren’t for the fact that an entertainer, Tracy Morgan, was the victim of a crash, this would have gone unnoticed, but it happens day in and day out,” Mr. Jasny said.

    Safety investigators said that sleepy or drowsy driving was a far more common problem than most people think it is. Drivers who begin their workweek with just one nighttime period of rest instead of two were more likely to have lapses in attention and to deviate from their lanes while driving.

    But how extensive the problem is remains a matter of debate, because it is difficult to obtain evidence that drivers fell asleep. In 1990, a National Transportation Safety Board study of 182 heavy-truck accidents in which the truck driver died concluded that fatigue played a role in 31 percent of the cases, more than alcohol or drugs.

    The Department of Transportation based its new rules on a lower estimate, saying it believes that fatigue-related causes accounted for 13 percent of all trucking accidents. That figure comes from a 2006 project known as the Large-Truck Crash Causation Study. Federal officials cautioned that fatigue was often underreported in crash investigations because truck drivers do not want to acknowledge being sleepy, lest they be seen as at fault.

    Trucking industry officials rely on cases in which fatigue has been positively established as a cause of a crash. The American Trucking Associations said that a federal database of fatal crashes cited fatigue in less than 2 percent of police reports about accidents involving trucks. A more accurate estimate, the group said, is that driver fatigue plays a role in about 7 percent of truck crashes.

    “Until we have a blood test for determining fatigue, all estimates are likely going to underreport fatigue, because the dead don’t speak and the living often plead the Fifth, especially if they are facing criminal charges,” said Deborah A. P. Hersman, the former chairwoman of the N.T.S.B. and now the president and chief executive of the National Safety Council.

    The Transportation Department has proposed that all interstate commercial truck and bus companies be required to use electronic logging devices to increase compliance with driving-hour rules. Paper logs are easier to manipulate and more difficult for law enforcement officials to verify. The comment period for the rule is scheduled to end this month.

    Some commercial truck fleets already such devices. For instance, Walmart’s trucks have GPS and electronic logging systems, which track where the vehicles are and what they are doing.

    A Walmart spokeswoman said the truck involved in the accident that injured Mr. Morgan, who remains in a New Jersey hospital, was also outfitted with anti-collision technology, which is supposed to alert drivers if there is a car in a neighboring lane when they activate their turn signal, for example. It is also supposed to slow the truck down automatically if it is approaching slow-moving or stopped traffic.

    Citing the incomplete investigation, Walmart declined to provide specifics on the accident or the driver’s schedule in the days leading up to the crash. A spokeswoman said, however, that the company believes the driver had not gone over federal guidelines.

    Still, truckers work under enormous pressure. Independent drivers are paid by the mile and therefore have big incentives to drive as much as possible.

    “It’s no day at the park,” said Kalvin Simon, of Manchester, Ga., who has driven a truck for seven years. “I’m still always moving, and when I’m sleeping, I’m usually sleeping in my truck. But I enjoy it.”

    When it comes to fatigue, Mr. Simon said, he doesn’t take any chances: “If I get tired, I pull over and stop. It’s that simple.”
     
    AfterShock, 77smartin and gpsman Thank this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. CargoWahgo

    CargoWahgo Road Train Member

    3,912
    3,944
    Jan 10, 2012
    Louisville, Kentucky
    0
    Where's the six hours of load time a day mention nyt ?
     
  4. NYSuperTrucker

    NYSuperTrucker Light Load Member

    273
    121
    Dec 22, 2010
    Twin Cities MN
    0
  5. CondoCruiser

    CondoCruiser The Legend

    19,726
    18,731
    Apr 18, 2010
    Tennessee
    0
    We need Abe the K&B driver to tell them his story. :)

    No one wants to address the music chairs with circadian rhythm.
     
  6. jaso36

    jaso36 Medium Load Member

    562
    706
    Jan 19, 2012
    West End,Nc
    0
    We need to pull over for a little while and when these people miss their stuff enough we will get these issues resolved instead of newspapers spreading ignorance they would spread the truth
     
    Stormdriven Thanks this.
  7. pupeperson

    pupeperson Light Load Member

    216
    203
    Jun 9, 2013
    0
    “If I get tired, I pull over and stop. It’s that simple.”

    That's exactly what is supposed to happen, but it was a whole lot easier to do under the old rules. Now, that 14 hour bugaboo is always lurking and it makes drivers say to themselves "maybe I'm really not THAT tired" and push on beyond where good sense would indicate a nap was in order. Flexibility is what drivers need, and it's the very thing these new rules and those under consideration take away.
     
  8. AfterShock

    AfterShock Road Train Member

    6,645
    10,117
    Sep 19, 2007
    Inland Empire, California
    0
    So, the Wal*Mart Big truck was equipped with collision avoidance as well as other electronic "safety" devices to prevent what happened from happening. If, by chance, investigations determine the cause to be an electronic device malfunction, I wonder if that would be considered reason to conduct further testing before mandating the technology be installed in all Big trucks?

    Or would it be considered more politically correct to gloss over any contributing factors that might suggest that it was a device installed for safety that the driver thought was reliable enough to depend on, that started the chain of events?

    Why not just cut to the chase and get 'er over with pronto?
    Pass a new law makin' it illegal to die in a traffic crash without first obtainin' permission, --- for a fee, of course.
    See how that works out.
    As for video cameras pointin' either way bein' passed off as promoting safety, is, at best, a half-truth. Their presence won't prevent crashes from happening, but it's safe to assume they'd come in handy in court to ascertain who wins the big money prize, or who saves a bundle.
    Cha-ChinG!
    Show 'em da money.
     
    Joetro and pupeperson Thank this.
  9. cabwrecker

    cabwrecker The clutch wrecker

    1,612
    1,398
    Mar 23, 2012
    0
    New York Times- "Buy us when the store is out of toilet paper."
     
  10. STexan

    STexan Road Train Member

    14,962
    29,144
    Oct 3, 2011
    Longview, TX
    0
    We've been dealing with this same angle for decades. Remember the 20/20 story on "killer trucks" 30+ years ago? Don't worry about it but more importantly, don't make their point for them by demanding "less stringent" rules!!! Be smart how you phrase your concerns and issues. Let the well-paid attorneys speaking on behalf of truckers make the public comments in public forums. All you truck drivers running your mouth making radical statements in a public forum can/will only make the situation worse.
     
    dogcatcher, gpsman and EZX1100 Thank this.
  11. pupeperson

    pupeperson Light Load Member

    216
    203
    Jun 9, 2013
    0
    "...don't make their point for them by demanding "less stringent" rules!!!"

    Someone with some first-hand knowledge of which rules "work" and which rules don't needs to be heard. The HOS rules as they existed for 50 years worked well. I literally can't remember the last time I slept for 10 consecutive hours. And nobody can tell me that driving this modern equipment is more physically taxing or demanding than the trucks of the old days. The stuff I used to drive would wear you out! There were very few women drivers then because they physically couldn't handle the Armstrong power steering and a ride that literally beat you up every day, on a seat the upholstered equivalent of an orange crate, over frost heaves that broke springs, axles and even frames on a fairly regular basis. This new equipment is amazing.

    In an industry as diverse as ours, a one size fits all approach to the HOS rules is bound to work better for some than others. My personal belief is there are many extremely vocal political organizations (MADD, CRASH, etc.) that are funded by competing industries (rail) that, by furthering their own agendas, end up giving a competitive advantage to that mode (which explains why the rails fund them) and by so doing actually decrease safety by increasing congestion and creating more tired drivers rather than less. The American Way to success has traditionally been getting ahead by working harder or smarter. The newest rules including the "big brotheresque" oversight turn a driving career into a dead-end job in most cases by allowing neither. Owner Operators are becoming a vanishing breed. Someone needs to speak out. I'm not talking about radical action by crazed lunatics, just some common sense. I've driven several million accident free miles and don't believe I need any more oversight or controls. Look at the Wal-Mart crash in NJ for example: That equipment contained every safety device known to man and it can be virtually guaranteed was being operated within the HOS rules. Yet, the accident still happened. Because there was a celebrity involved, the over-reaction is ridiculous. The solution: Tighten the screws (or at least prevent the proposed loosening of them) on an entire industry because of one inattentive driver, which is what the final verdict of a huge investigation is going to say. It's nuts.
     
    AfterShock Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.