Truckers' Trucking Forum | Largest CDL Truck Driver Message Board - The Premier Truck Drivers Forum!  

Go Back   Truckers' Trucking Forum | Largest CDL Truck Driver Message Board > Truckers & The Trucking Industry > Trucking Industry Regulations

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum

Trucking Industry Regulations Wipin' The Fog Off The Log. Forum/Discussion of trucking regulations, hours of service, log books, rules, laws, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  ^ Top   #1  
Old 03.31.2007
MACK E-6's Avatar
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 01.19.2009 05.21 AM
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Trucker? 7 Years
Age: 34
Posts: 2,677
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 188
Thanked: 155 Times
HazMat shipments

Was there a law passed in the last few years prohibiting shipments of certain hazardous materials in bulk?

I recently delivered a transmission to a pest control guy who told me that he can't get some of his chemicals in 55 gal. drums anymore thanks to Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, even though 55 gals is not enough to be considered a bulk shipment.
__________________
Z-Lady's devoted hubby.

Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #2  
Old 03.31.2007
pro1driver's Avatar
Light Load Member
 
Last Seen: 06.09.2007 09.03 PM
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: North East, USA
Posts: 941
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 6 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACK E-6 View Post
Was there a law passed in the last few years prohibiting shipments of certain hazardous materials in bulk?

I recently delivered a transmission to a pest control guy who told me that he can't get some of his chemicals in 55 gal. drums anymore thanks to Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, even though 55 gals is not enough to be considered a bulk shipment.
i don't think so, but i am giving you a link to browse through.



[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Truck Forum Link.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #3  
Old 03.31.2007
LogsRus's Avatar
"Log it Legal"
 
Last Seen: 3 Weeks Ago 05.15 AM
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Trucker? Trucking Industry
Age: 39
Posts: 2,490
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 3
Thanked: 166 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACK E-6 View Post
Was there a law passed in the last few years prohibiting shipments of certain hazardous materials in bulk?

I recently delivered a transmission to a pest control guy who told me that he can't get some of his chemicals in 55 gal. drums anymore thanks to Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, even though 55 gals is not enough to be considered a bulk shipment.
I have no idea, we don't haul much haz-mat. I don't recall this being an issue though, but that doesn't mean it isn't true. I can ask Monday though? Let me know if you find out the answer.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #4  
Old 04.01.2007
2xR 2xR is offline
Banned or Retired
 
Last Seen: 4 Weeks Ago 09.13 PM
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Ol' North State
Trucker? 20 Years
Posts: 417
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 24 Times
Cool I haul bulk HAZMAT...

I have not heard of any restrictions beyond the segregation rules that restrict hauling certain combinations of chemicals.

On the other-hand, there are restrictions concerning unlicensed parties possessing some chemicals. Ammonium Nitrate comes to mind. I like to garden and corn is my favorite crop. It requires top dressing when about 18" tall. Top dressing involves applying a strong fertilizer (Ammonium Nitrate) between the stalks, then pulling lots of loose soil up on the stalks to provide stability for the growth spurt that will occur. Just to purchase a 100lb bag requires a photo ID and completing an identification form. I'd hate to think of the hassles of buying a truck load of the stuff.

Odd that diesel fuel, the other ingredient needed to produce an explosive, has no restrictions.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #5  
Old 04.01.2007
Light Load Member
 
Last Seen: 05.12.2007 09.57 AM
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: From schoolbus stop to schoolbus stop!
Age: 44
Posts: 54
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
Have there been any changes in the laws about how a hazmat item is listed on the BOL? At work 2 weeks ago I was informed by another company that some of the rules have changed after I had put a hold on their shipment for improperly listed hazmat.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #6  
Old 04.05.2007
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 04.17.2008 04.50 AM
Member Since: Apr 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 2
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
There is a current regulation that changes the sequence in whijch the required information must be shown. The "old" sequence was Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, (subsidiary Hazard Classes), ID Number, Packing Group as in Hydrogen peroxide, Aqueous Solutions, 5.1 (8), UN2014, PGII. The "new" sequence, which is meant to conform to international standards, calls for the ID number to be first in the sequence, as in UN2014, Hydrogen peroxide, Aqueous Solutions, 5.1 (8), PGII. This is a minor change that went into effect 01/01/2007, and the implementation of this change is optional until 01/01/2013. This was published in the end of December 2006 as the final rule on HM-215I, and specifically modified 49 CFR 172.202 (as regards shipping papers).
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #7  
Old 04.05.2007
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 04.17.2008 04.50 AM
Member Since: Apr 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 2
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACK E-6 View Post
Was there a law passed in the last few years prohibiting shipments of certain hazardous materials in bulk?

I recently delivered a transmission to a pest control guy who told me that he can't get some of his chemicals in 55 gal. drums anymore thanks to Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, even though 55 gals is not enough to be considered a bulk shipment.
The only recent change that comes to mind in this area is the requirement for a "Hazardous Materials Safety Permit" when hauling certain quantities of specific hazmats as listed in 49 CFR 385.403.

This section prohibits transportation of more than one liter (per package) of Zone A PIH materials without first obtaining the HMSP. It's a safe bet that certain materials used by exterminators would likely be PIH materials, and if those materials are classed as Zone A, the "119-gallon bulk rule" is pre-empted by 385.403...

BTW -- the same holds true for Zone B PIH materials in standard bulk package quantities!
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #8  
Old 04.07.2007
Cybergal's Avatar
Truck Forum Supporter
 
Last Seen: 04.16.2009 05.42 AM
Member Since: Oct 2008
Posts: 13,838
My Trucking Photos: 27

Thanks: 2,066
Thanked: 2,575 Times
My Truckers Blog : 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACK E-6 View Post
Was there a law passed in the last few years prohibiting shipments of certain hazardous materials in bulk?

I recently delivered a transmission to a pest control guy who told me that he can't get some of his chemicals in 55 gal. drums anymore thanks to Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, even though 55 gals is not enough to be considered a bulk shipment.
If there is a new Haz-Mat rule then the LTL carrier that I work for don't know about it...LOL...and we carry lot's of Haz-Mat!
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #9  
Old 04.07.2007
LogsRus's Avatar
"Log it Legal"
 
Last Seen: 3 Weeks Ago 05.15 AM
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Trucker? Trucking Industry
Age: 39
Posts: 2,490
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 3
Thanked: 166 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACK E-6 View Post
Was there a law passed in the last few years prohibiting shipments of certain hazardous materials in bulk?

I recently delivered a transmission to a pest control guy who told me that he can't get some of his chemicals in 55 gal. drums anymore thanks to Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, even though 55 gals is not enough to be considered a bulk shipment.
Is this what maybe he was referring to??? I don't know just skimming through the Haz-mat changes and I ran across the 55 pounts. I could be way off here Mack.

HM PERMITTING - 49 CFR 385.400

After January 1, 2005, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) requires motor carriers to obtain a Hazardous Materials Safety Permit (HMSP) prior to transporting certain highly hazardous materials. An HMSP is required to transport any of the following materials:

A highway route-controlled quantity of a Class 7 (radioactive) material;
More than 25 kg (55 pounds) of a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) material or an amount of a Division 1.5 (explosive) material requiring placarding under 49 CFR 172;
More than one liter (1.08 quarts) per package of a "material poisonous by inhalation," that meets the criteria for "hazard zone A";
A "material poisonous by inhalation," that meets the criteria for "hazard zone B," in a bulk packaging (capacity greater than 460 L (119 gallons));
A "material poisonous by inhalation," that meets the criteria for "hazard zone C," or "hazard zone D," in a packaging having a capacity equal to or greater than 13,248 L (3,500 gallons); or
A shipment of compressed or refrigerated liquefied methane or liquefied natural gas, or other liquefied gas with a methane content of at least 85 percent, in a bulk packaging having a capacity equal to or greater than 13,248 L (3,500 gallons).

Here is the link to the changes and regulations.
[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Truck Forum Link.

Last edited by LogsRus; 04.07.2007 at 07.50 PM.. Reason: To add the link
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #10  
Old 05.21.2008
im6under's Avatar
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 6 Days Ago 09.41 AM
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: iowa
Trucker? 2 Years
Age: 45
Posts: 2,516
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 551
Thanked: 422 Times
the thing that changed was he couldn't afford the shipping charges on only 55 gallons...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Trucker Forum Replies Last Post
hazmat beezle Questions From New Drivers 33 11.05.2009 03.54 PM
Trucking rules eased to aid farm shipments Cybergal Truckers News 0 01.02.2008 12.23 PM
Trucking Shipments Keep Falling Cybergal Truckers News 1 10.24.2007 05.35 PM
Trucking shipments drop in July Cybergal Truckers News 0 08.27.2007 06.55 PM
hazmat cno415 Trucking Industry Regulations 2 08.12.2007 02.44 PM


.


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © TheTruckersReport.com - Trucking Forum & Message Board - Truck Driver Discussion - Truck Forum

Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy Statement.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO