Truckers' Trucking Forum | Message Board | Discussion - The Premier Truck Drivers Forum!  

Trucker MySpace - Truckers Making Friends. Chicken Truckers Come Meet Other Truckers!

Good Trucking Jobs - Forget Those CRAP Trucking Jobs & Find A Good Trucking Job!




Go Back   Truckers' Trucking Forum | Message Board | Discussion > The Garage > Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum
Sponsored Links

Important Truckers Forum Notice!

Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] Roll On Big Mama. Forum/Discussion about Eighteen Wheeler Trucks. What truck do you like or dislike? Is your favorite truck a Mack, Peterbilt, Kenworth, Marmon, Volvo or Freightliner? Which diesel engine do you prefer; Detroit Diesel, Cummins, or...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  ^ Top   #11  
Old 04.22.2006
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 09.22.2006 08.44 PM
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
I've noticed that a lot of new trucks with Cat ACERT engines have really high rear ratios, like 3.36 and 3.25. I read some where that these new engines could lug down lower than the older ones and that's why they spec'd trucks with higher gears, and also to help get better fuel economy. Does the high ratio have much impact on the power of the truck as far as getting up to speed and into top gears? My dad and brother both have F-150 pickups with the 4.6L V8. Dad's has a 3.55 gear and my brother's has a 3.31, which should get better mileage, but it has a harder time getting into overdrive. Does this same problem exist in high-geared tractors?
__________________
Jesus is Lord!
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #12  
Old 04.23.2006
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Last Seen: 05.20.2007 05.39 PM
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Rossville, Georgia
Posts: 957
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 16 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joethemechanic
Turbo,

It was $3.25 here in Philly last night when I filled up. I about had a heart attack. I figure it is probably $3.30 or more today.

Just as a side note my little 8,600 GVW Chevy single wheel utility body service truck with a 5.7L gas motor cost me 25 cents a mile in fuel costs last week. And that was buying most of my gas in NJ where it is 10 to 15 cents cheaper than Pa.
Yikes!!!! What the heck is going on up there?

I'm sorry....I thought you made a boo boo....I guess I did.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #13  
Old 04.23.2006
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 09.15.2008 07.59 PM
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Southwestern Michigan (Lawrence)
Posts: 2,182
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 13 Times
2000 Mack 400, 10 speed Easton Fuller autoshift, usually running about 1450 rpm at about 62-63 mph and I get about 5.5-5.75 in mileage. And that sounds horrible, but the trailers I pull are real fuel hogs. Lots of plumbing, hatches, valves catwalks, and other stuff hanging out in the airstream. Ribbing vertical and horizontal on the sides, and the ends have ladders and plumbing at that end of the airflow. I have found when I pull a van, I get 6.75-7.00 mpg, so this is all the result of the trailers I pull. My trucks specs and my driving technique are much better than you would ever guess from seeing the fuel mileage numbers.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #14  
Old 04.24.2006
MACK E-6's Avatar
Trucker Forum STAFF
 
Last Seen: 15 Hours Ago 10.24 PM
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Trucker? 7 Years
Age: 33
Posts: 2,777
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 167
Thanked: 71 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboTrucker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joethemechanic
Turbo,

It was $3.25 here in Philly last night when I filled up. I about had a heart attack. I figure it is probably $3.30 or more today.

Just as a side note my little 8,600 GVW Chevy single wheel utility body service truck with a 5.7L gas motor cost me 25 cents a mile in fuel costs last week. And that was buying most of my gas in NJ where it is 10 to 15 cents cheaper than Pa.
Yikes!!!! What the heck is going on up there?

I'm sorry....I thought you made a boo boo....I guess I did.
At the Exxon in Breezewood, PA as of about 4 A.M Friday, diesel was 2.95, and gas was 2.99, 3.19, and 3.39.
__________________
Z-Lady's devoted hubby.

Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #15  
Old 04.24.2006
MACK E-6's Avatar
Trucker Forum STAFF
 
Last Seen: 15 Hours Ago 10.24 PM
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Trucker? 7 Years
Age: 33
Posts: 2,777
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 167
Thanked: 71 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burky
2000 Mack 400, 10 speed Easton Fuller autoshift, usually running about 1450 rpm at about 62-63 mph and I get about 5.5-5.75 in mileage. And that sounds horrible, but the trailers I pull are real fuel hogs. Lots of plumbing, hatches, valves catwalks, and other stuff hanging out in the airstream. Ribbing vertical and horizontal on the sides, and the ends have ladders and plumbing at that end of the airflow. I have found when I pull a van, I get 6.75-7.00 mpg, so this is all the result of the trailers I pull. My trucks specs and my driving technique are much better than you would ever guess from seeing the fuel mileage numbers.
I usually get about 6.5, but I run wide open when traffic and conditions permit.
__________________
Z-Lady's devoted hubby.

Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #16  
Old 04.24.2006
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 09.15.2008 07.59 PM
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Southwestern Michigan (Lawrence)
Posts: 2,182
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 13 Times
But what kind of trailers are you dragging behind you. I guarantee I can pick up at least a mile, and probably more by hauling a van. But the pneumatics are what we haul. I've had a van hooked to me only one time in three years. I have a buddy of mine that had a F/L Classic, got 4.5 with us, and is now getting close to the 6 mark once he switched to another company and is pulling a van. His setup is a former US Express truck. Fuel mileage isn't just the truck, the trailer has a big impact on it.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links:

  ^ Top   #17  
Old 04.25.2006
Joethemechanic's Avatar
MIA (Banned or Retired)
 
Last Seen: 08.01.2008 12.27 AM
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Phila Pa
Age: 47
Posts: 382
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
The last time I pulled a van was back in the 80s unless you count storage trailers. It seemed to me that I got worse mileage pulling the van. But then again mt truck wasn't very areodynamic (R Model no fairings) and I am compairing it to hauling crane boom and counterweights on a flatbed.

I was also just thinking about my old Mack wrecker. It was an LJ single axle with an EN707 gas motor in it. If I kept it in a good state of tune, it got a wopping 3 MPG
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #18  
Old 04.25.2006
Bobtail Member
 
Last Seen: 10.21.2007 05.27 PM
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 Times
Bobtail fuel mileage?

Has anyone ever checked what kind of mileage you get bobtailing? Any guesses? I'm going to be running 1500 miles bobtail soon.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #19  
Old 04.26.2006
Road Train Member
 
Last Seen: 09.15.2008 07.59 PM
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Southwestern Michigan (Lawrence)
Posts: 2,182
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked: 13 Times
Hold the speed down, and resist the temptation to accelerate hard and you do pretty well bobtail. At the very least you have shed the rolling resistance of the trailer and cargo weight, and lost at least 8 tires in the process. I don't bobtail enough to have a firm answer about what it does to mileage (and I hope not to since trailers mean money!) but just the weight difference alone is going to allow the truck to do almost as well as it possibly can.
Reply With Quote
  ^ Top   #20  
Old 04.26.2006
MACK E-6's Avatar
Trucker Forum STAFF
 
Last Seen: 15 Hours Ago 10.24 PM
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Trucker? 7 Years
Age: 33
Posts: 2,777
My Trucking Photos: 0

Thanks: 167
Thanked: 71 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burky
But what kind of trailers are you dragging behind you. I guarantee I can pick up at least a mile, and probably more by hauling a van. But the pneumatics are what we haul. I've had a van hooked to me only one time in three years. I have a buddy of mine that had a F/L Classic, got 4.5 with us, and is now getting close to the 6 mark once he switched to another company and is pulling a van. His setup is a former US Express truck. Fuel mileage isn't just the truck, the trailer has a big impact on it.
Van bodies. 48's, 53's or two 28's.
__________________
Z-Lady's devoted hubby.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Truckers Forum Bookmarks - Like This Thread? Tell The World!

Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board
Truckers Accessories


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Trucker Forum Replies Last Post
Getting Better Fuel Mileage maxeffort Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] 62 09.14.2008 01.13 AM
detriot 470 vs 430 fuel mileage javelinjeff Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] 6 05.12.2008 04.35 PM
What do I do with fuel tax/mileage sheets? PeterbiltCouple Trucking Industry Regulations 2 01.09.2008 01.06 AM
Propane for fuel mileage roadking1474 Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] 23 09.12.2007 04.50 PM
Fuel Mileage jkn51 Ask An Owner Operator 4 04.07.2007 10.58 PM


.


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © The Truckers Report - Trucking Forum & Message Board - Truck Driver Discussion - Truck Forum

Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO