![]() |
| |||||||
| Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum | |||||
| |
| Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] Roll On Big Mama. Forum/Discussion about Eighteen Wheeler Trucks. What truck do you like or dislike? Is your favorite truck a Mack, Peterbilt, Kenworth, Marmon, Volvo or Freightliner? Which diesel engine do you prefer; Detroit Diesel, Cummins, or... |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rating: | Display Modes |
| |||
| Also consider for large fleets like Swift, purchase price comes into play. Mack is probably gonna be a more expensive truck than a Frieghtliner or Int'l. Plus weights come into play as well. Mack is generally a heavy truck as they have always been a vocational HD kind of truck. Although Mack does have some OTR spec trucks these days it's hard to make a dent in a market that they haven't ever really been in with any kind of presence. Mack has a LOT of trucks on the road, but they are not as visible. No one stops and looks twice at a garbage truck, or USPS truck or the country Roads truck. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to 69W900A For This Useful Post: | ||
david07003 (11.12.2009) | ||
| Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links: |
| |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to striker For This Useful Post: | ||
david07003 (11.13.2009), LoneCowboy (11.13.2009) | ||
| ||||
| Quote:
Actually, from what I understand, in terms of pricing/willingness of dealer to haggle from high to low: 1. Int'l (the new lonestar commands a premium price) 2. Peterbuilt 3. Kenworth 4. Volvo 5. Western Star 6. Mack My boss almost bought me an '09 Pete, but a Pete spec'd similar to my Mack was $124,000 and Pete wouldn't deal, we paid $112,500 for my '09 Mack, gave $8K trade-in on my '00 CH that I was driving (in fact Mack resold that CH two days after taking it on trade for $12,500). |
| ||||
| Nice truck. Quote:
__________________ (view of Newark, NJ from Port Newark-Elizabeth)Nothing like the smell of the air of the New Jersey Turnpike. |
| |||
| Quote:
The amount the dealership is willing to "haggle" depends on the dealer, salesman and regional location. I can get a much better deal on a KW than I can on a Volvo or Mack. That has nothing to do with the PRICE, but my KW dealer will work with me on the price more than the local Mack dealer. At a dealer level all this is pretty dependant on the location and dealers a person is working with. |
| ||||
| Quote:
It depends, Waste Managment ordered 15,000 new trash trucks from Mack last year, the order was handled through the 10 dealerships around the country. One local dirt hauler ordered 40 new daycabs from Mack a couple of years back, they went through the dealer. I agree it depends on the dealer, the KW and Pete dealers in my area won't haggle but the Mack dealer will to an extent. |
| Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links: |
| |
| ||||
| Quote:
It sucks in a cross wind. My old truck was a 56" condo, if I was in a cross wind, other then feeling it blow I never knew it, with this one, the wind will get inside the roof fairings and whip around and cause the back of cab fairings on top top to shudder and rattle like crazy. |
| ||||
| Weight. Quote:
As for weight, do you feel that it is too heavy compared to the rest that out there?
__________________ (view of Newark, NJ from Port Newark-Elizabeth)Nothing like the smell of the air of the New Jersey Turnpike. |
| |||
| wt. is totally dependent on how you order the truck Mack rears and trans. are heavier than Eaton, Meritors, ect. thus the reason you see other vendors trans and rears in a Mack, frame rail spec, wheel base, amoung other things but my Vision not super light but no heavier than other trucks I have. I think 56" flat top would be the way to go, its very hard to find a Mack with that bunk, looks better with out the fairings, |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mack427 For This Useful Post: | ||
david07003 (11.13.2009) | ||
| ||||
| Quote:
Mark |
![]() |
| Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board | |||||
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Trucker Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Volvo, Mack merge under one corporate roof | rookietrucker | Truckers News | 0 | 10.22.2009 12.14 PM |
| Mack unveils one Titan of a truck, MP10 engine | Cybergal | Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] | 16 | 03.18.2009 08.14 PM |
| The Adventures of Mack | Agent86 | Ask An Owner Operator | 53 | 12.18.2008 12.13 AM |
| Certain Mack engines exempt from idling limit | Cybergal | Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] | 0 | 05.05.2008 02.19 PM |
| Mack unveils low-NOx engines that meet California standards | Cybergal | Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] | 0 | 05.01.2008 05.35 PM |
Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy Statement.