![]() |
| |||||||
| Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board - The Premiere Truck Driver Forum | |||||
| |
| Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ] Roll On Big Mama. Forum/Discussion about Eighteen Wheeler Trucks. What truck do you like or dislike? Is your favorite truck a Mack, Peterbilt, Kenworth, Marmon, Volvo or Freightliner? Which diesel engine do you prefer; Detroit Diesel, Cummins, or... |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| |||
| I need info on 2001 freightliner classic ...DOT inspections 48 states Califonia etc? I found a beautiful 2001 FLD classic for sale..it has a Detroit series 60-12.7L, rebuilt 13 speed, 3.73 rear end, truck has 900k miles and a newer Carrier APU..excellent running and good oil change records every 12k miles...lots of good maintenance records too. If I can get it to last at least 2-3 years I figure it will be worth it. I can get this truck real cheap but I'm wondering about the future of this truck as far as the DOT. I heard California requires special engine and emission. Will this truck be able to drive 48 states? What will I have to do to it to pass all DOT inspections?..or will it be in the bone yard after 2013 |
| Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links: |
| |
| ||||
| dont go to CA. nothing there worth seeing anyways
__________________ Never Underestimate the power of the Schwartz! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to MedicineMan For This Useful Post: | ||
southernpride (11.13.2009) | ||
| |||
| Mediceman has the right answer. Just stay out of California and everything in your trucking life will be easier.....unless you live there. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jagerbomber3.0 For This Useful Post: | ||
southernpride (11.13.2009) | ||
| ||||
| So far JasontheRock is the only one with the correct answer. I have a 2001 Pete 379 with a C-15 & no emissions & no changes made for California. I have to the end of 2012 to continue running California. After that I will no longer be allowed into the state unless I retro fit my truck. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to REDD For This Useful Post: | ||
southernpride (11.13.2009) | ||
| Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Truck Forum and Trucking Community For Free. Sponsored Links: |
| |
| ||||
| I guess that's subjective because I still think my answer is the right one
__________________ Never Underestimate the power of the Schwartz! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to MedicineMan For This Useful Post: | ||
jagerbomber3.0 (11.12.2009) | ||
| ||||
| I understand your way of thinking. I'm going to be thinking the same way after 12/31/2012. But right now I'm playing by their rules & hauling the freight. I'm loading in the morning heading back to LA & already got a reload coming back into Texas! |
| ||||
| if you read the wording of the CA legislation you will notice that upgrading to a DPF will not GAURANTEE you will be compliant. It's worded something like, it MAY bring you into compliance. in short the only way to gaurantee is to buy a new truck. that's what all this is about anyways. Look to see how much money has been put behind this legislation from truck manufacturers
__________________ Never Underestimate the power of the Schwartz! |
| |||
| California has always said they are on the leading edge. My stomach would tighten up every time I went through their scales and I lived in Tracy. Got inspected once just W of Reno NV and passed because I told them before hand I had marginal drivers and had them ordered but they were at our terminal in MT. The lady supervisor must have liked me. I wonder if Pumpkin and JB can deliver all the strawberries ontime when everyone quits. |
| ||||
| Quote:
With produce you can't be relaying loads or having drivers shut down for a re set in the middle. I believe where I am at there is almost nobody ca compliant. Besides they have pushed back the deadline twice already and I believe they will again. They're simply too broke to enforce it
__________________ Never Underestimate the power of the Schwartz! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to MedicineMan For This Useful Post: | ||
Kinghunter (11.14.2009) | ||
![]() |
| Truckers' Trucking Forum/Message Board | |||||
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Trucker Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some truckers oppose letting Mexican trucks on U.S. roads | Cybergal | Mexican Truckers Forum | 160 | 2 Weeks Ago 09.18 AM |
| sites needed for gathering various trucking info across all states. | ziggystyles | Experienced Truckers' Advice | 2 | 12.22.2008 03.20 PM |
| "I Like Mike" | jamwadmag | Politics | 164 | 12.10.2007 08.53 PM |
| Fox News Wants War With Iran.. | Joehill | Politics | 97 | 09.09.2007 09.30 AM |
| DOT seeks inspections of steel arch truss bridges | Cybergal | Truckers News | 1 | 08.05.2007 05.19 AM |
Trucker Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Trucker Forum Discussion Board at TheTruckersReport.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not The Truckers Report. The Truckers Report does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the Truck Driver Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of The Truckers Report or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. The Truckers Report does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. The Truckers Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy Statement.