CSA 2010: How will the Driver Rating System affect you?
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by Yatista, Oct 18, 2009.
Page 13 of 50
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I would qualcomm the condition also, and track everything. If told to run bad loads or equipment, make sure it is said on the quailcomm, and not the phone. The problem is both you and the company will get dinged with the new system. Until the companies get hit harder than the driver for equipment violations that can be proven was reported to the company by inspection reports or qualcomm, then companies will continue to push drivers. If several thousand trucks and trailers are owned, the amount of bad inspections will have to be a lot to move the safety score upward if the majority of inspections are good.
A driver can take the blame as far as the company is concerned. The driver is easily replaced, plus, they would like to get rid of you before you start getting raises and benefits, then replace you with someone else making training wages. -
-
Please elaborate? -
Read the prior thread.
Anything that the driver can be held responsible for is also company responsibility. To knowing drive something that can get you dinged and on your record may not be a wise move like the poster said you may have to do.dieselbear Thanks this. -
There is no such thing as a Johnny on the spot, always legal driver, no matter how hard a person tries. It just can't happen. I'm not worried about the CSA2010. Luckily I have a clean record, and hope it stays that way. I can, and have, refused to move unsafe equipment, and will do it again when the time comes. I'm not a rogue driver these days, even though I have been very much so in the past. Times change, and the consequences for bad deeds do not warrant the risk in my opinion. -
I am not saying you are or not.
My comment is in response to the driver making a decision to run with questionable equipment or not. Those are the positions that may have issues. -
I knew I had problems with my steer tire 2 weeks before I saw any uneven wear and asked the company (arent they cool?) look at it. They had my truck for 15 days fixing the A/C and someone in our shop even wrote in the shop notes that I was experiencing steer tire problems, but they decided to ignore the problem until they couldnt ignore me any longer. If I hadnt of threatened to drive across a scale and ask for some help, I'm sure that I would still have that bald tire!
Most of us operate in "grey areas". We balance what we percieve to be the chances of getting caught or breaking down (the risk) against the cost of down time for an accident, a repair, or OOS order (the punishment) so we can make the money we need to pay for our way of life (the reward). In most OTR scenarios down time is lost pay, we will try to avoid that at all costs! However if we were paid for all our time, except sleeping and eating, maybe we would get our equipment repaired when it was needed.
These companies and the DOT keep making the punishment larger and easier to get AND keep making the reward smaller and harder to get! Conseqently, the risk factor just keeps going up! Does that make any sense? -
-
Brickman
I agree wholeheartedly. These idiots should have never, ever wore the badge. Like I have said before, all fields have them. I am just glad these no longer patrol.Brickman Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 13 of 50