Cat 6NZ 475HP and 550HP difference

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by NFDDJS, Oct 3, 2012.

  1. NFDDJS

    NFDDJS Light Load Member

    267
    37
    Jul 8, 2012
    New Hampshire
    0
    What is if any difference between the 2002 6NZ 475HP and 550HP.

    I have one truck that has the 6NZ rated for 475HP and wanted to know if there is any difference and if not I was going to turn it up to 550HP next time it needs service.

    Anybody done this? Any problems?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. underpsi

    underpsi Road Train Member

    1,266
    291
    Sep 18, 2008
    Toronto, Ont
    0
    There might be a slight difference in the turbo but you can turn a 475 up to a 550 without worries.
     
  4. Mr. Haney

    Mr. Haney Road Train Member

    2,693
    2,035
    Dec 17, 2008
    0
    There is no difference in these two power rating as far as engine hard parts are concerned. The difference is the flash file in the ECM. If the truck doesn't have a transmission or clutch rated for 1850lb-ft of torque, CAT will refuse to uprate the file in the ECM. PM me if they refuse to do this for you.
     
    Steinbrenner and 123456 Thank this.
  5. Cat sdp

    Cat sdp . .

    19,882
    64,244
    Apr 8, 2012
    Orion's Belt
    0
    I had Milton turn up a motor once. What a waste of time, could barely tell the difference power wise.
    It ran fine , just wasn't lively enough for me.
     
    Cetane+ Thanks this.
  6. black_dog106

    black_dog106 Road Train Member

    1,786
    1,664
    Mar 29, 2009
    MA
    0
    As long as Cat sdp brought it up... I have been in 3 trucks turned up by Cat to "550". As he said very little improvement in power but they seem to burn much more fuel for very little power gain. Maybe it's just me???
     
    Cetane+ Thanks this.
  7. DieselDummy

    DieselDummy Light Load Member

    173
    62
    Apr 1, 2012
    Willet,NY
    0

    Nope wasn't you, Milton did my 01 to and that was a waste of 500.00!!
     
    Cetane+ Thanks this.
  8. SmokinCAT

    SmokinCAT Road Train Member

    1,773
    1,484
    Oct 20, 2010
    Hillsboro, OH./ Adrian, MI
    0
    Most likely when it was updated the most modern file available was used, most likely a low nox file, you were better of with your previous tune, Mr Haneys will be a pre low nox file and would show the proper performance gains.
     
    josh polk and t800kwopper Thank this.
  9. morehp

    morehp Medium Load Member

    699
    206
    Jun 18, 2012
    0
    Can any one clarafy when cat do a field uprate . The ones I have seen they set the fls fts to 0,0 as a default value . I think this is also where they loose the fuel economy as well as the low nox crappy file. The two together = a waste of $$$$. Not sure about the par Dyno side of things maybe if they did it that way it would be slightly better for the performance and fuel economy .
     
    t800kwopper Thanks this.
  10. rollin coal

    rollin coal Road Train Member

    12,529
    23,849
    Mar 29, 2008
    TN
    0
    I second this. OP, you're wasting your time and money having CAT do the uprate. You won't be happy with it. Haney's got what you need.
     
    josh polk, t800kwopper and Mr. Haney Thank this.
  11. Lalito1234

    Lalito1234 Light Load Member

    108
    7
    Oct 2, 2013
    chicago il
    0
    Wat ratio's do yu guys have? That might be the reason y slight difference in power
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.