Thoughts on 2014 Volvo vnl 670 Ishift d13 with 2.47 rears

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by ratabekov, Sep 4, 2016.

  1. ratabekov

    ratabekov Bobtail Member

    18
    7
    Sep 1, 2015
    0
    I found volvo 2014 ishift with 2.47 rears for sale. Truck has 400k asking price is 57k. Was wondering what are the opinions on 2.47 rears. What will be rpm at 70mph? Does ishif stays in 11th gear when heavy? What mpg should i expect. Will be pulling dry van mostly in north east. Thanks a lot in advance. Rusty
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Sharky88

    Sharky88 Heavy Load Member

    710
    840
    Sep 25, 2013
    0
    Are you sure it's 2.47? Never heard of it being that low. I have 2.64 in my Volvo. D16 I shift run 1150 rpm at 65
     
  4. ratabekov

    ratabekov Bobtail Member

    18
    7
    Sep 1, 2015
    0
    Yes door jam sticker says 2.47. I drove 2.64 ishift for a year and i liked it. Not sure what to expect on 2.47 under a load, Thanks
     
  5. Zeviander

    Zeviander Road Train Member

    4,888
    36,994
    Jan 23, 2015
    Winnipeg, MB, CA
    0
    You'll just need final drive ratio and tire size to determine rpm at a particular speed, IIRC.

    A Volvo manual says it's 0.78 (for 12th) and 1 (for 11th).

    Assuming 11R22.5 tires and 2.64 axle ratio, the Eaton Roadranger app says you will get 70.2 mph at 1200 rpm in 12th, and 68.5 mph for 1500 in 11th. So I'd assume, it would probably be 1100/1400 for 2.47. I don't know the exact math required to calculate it, but it's probably close.
     
  6. ratabekov

    ratabekov Bobtail Member

    18
    7
    Sep 1, 2015
    0
    Thanks Zeviander, rpm looks good for a flat open road, but i am wandering if it will be struggling on the slight hills.
     
  7. colorado18spd

    colorado18spd Medium Load Member

    396
    297
    Mar 10, 2013
    0
    Volvo sales could answer your question about it.
     
  8. gokiddogo

    gokiddogo Road Train Member

    8,781
    14,753
    Mar 5, 2012
    Ontario Canada
    0
    I don't understand the thinking behind tall rears making it sluggish in hills. The reduction just happens in the transmission instead. The final result is the same.

    Volvo probably did it because they know their current setup with 2.64 and I shift is perfect for 65-70mph. They have said if they could just get drivers to slow down the efficiency would be even better. That's now how we roll, though. This is probably exactly the same but designed for 70-75mph cruising speed.

    Volvo knows what it's doing. They build a very good, efficient truck. It's just not for me.
     
  9. colorado18spd

    colorado18spd Medium Load Member

    396
    297
    Mar 10, 2013
    0
    A 2.47 rear axle ratio with a direct drive transmission amounts to 1,370 rpm at 65 miles per hour. A 2.28 rear axle ratio equals 1,265 rpm at the same speed. The 105 less rpm between the two equates to an approximate 1.5% improvement in fuel efficiency. Quote from Volvo with 22.5 tires
     
  10. uncleal13

    uncleal13 Road Train Member

    3,757
    6,199
    Apr 9, 2009
    Humboldt, Sk
    0
    I got about 1175 rpm at 70 mph.
    That would be a D13 with the XE package. It's designed to run ultra low rpm at highway speeds. Runs VERY quiet.
    They are spec'd for running pretty much on flat ground. If you are in the mountains all the time, it is not recommended as it is hard on u-joints from all the lugging and you can't stay in top gear very much. But if you're just running all over the place it would be okay.
     
  11. Brettj3876

    Brettj3876 Road Train Member

    11,257
    54,039
    Nov 18, 2014
    Land of local
    0
    We had 2.47s in our shakers dd15 455 6.5mpg avg. Newer ones had 2.64 and 505hp got a tad over 7 in the northeast
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.