1988 GMC with 3406B CAT - Estimated Fuel Mileage?

Discussion in 'Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Mechanics Forum' started by Airman89, Jul 20, 2019.

  1. SoCalRed

    SoCalRed Medium Load Member

    437
    851
    Feb 7, 2017
    CA
    0
    Looks like some of the responses on here are from people that weren't even born when the 3406B was around.
    Had a 88 Pete with 3406B. Coast to coast fully loaded going east usually light going west 5.5 - 6 mpg round trip.
    Empty it depends if city or highway driving. On the highway you'll be getting 8.5-9 from what I remember pulling an empty reefer on mostly flat ground.
     
    Rideandrepair and Airman89 Thank this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Airman89

    Airman89 Light Load Member

    148
    15
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    What engine do you have in that topkick? How well do you like the fuel mileage and power?
     
  4. Airman89

    Airman89 Light Load Member

    148
    15
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    8.5-9 wouldn’t be so bad. It’s a straight truck so you think it’s probably about the same fuel as pulling an empty reefer? My problem is I’ll have a bunch of little local runs picking up logs here and there all week until I have a full load then a 4 hour round trip to the mill at the end of the week. In your opinion, is the 3406 too big or too much for this kind of work?

    I’ve had OTR truck 80k+ before with a nice 550hp bumped up 15.0l Cummins and it was awesome 1000s of miles but I’m wondering if the 3406 is going to kill me doing local work with a couple hour trip once a week.
     
  5. Airman89

    Airman89 Light Load Member

    148
    15
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    I guess it’s going to boil down to this for me.

    On the single axle 1988 F800 with the 6.6l, roughly how much weight could I load on the bed and still be able to drive down the highway?

    Vs

    How much weight could I load on the tandem axle 1988 GMC with the 3406b?

    Putting aside weight limited by tags, looking more for weight of the truck vs the actual weight I can carry on each truck. If the 6.6l can carry almost as much weight because it’s a lighter truck then the better fuel mileage could make me go that route. Not to mention whichever truck I get, I’ll be driving through customers yards when I’m picking up logs. The lighter the better.
     
  6. Airman89

    Airman89 Light Load Member

    148
    15
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    Thanks for all the quick replies by the way. I really appreciate it.
     
  7. MACK E-6

    MACK E-6 Moderator Staff Member

    46,081
    201,969
    Sep 19, 2005
    Baltimore, MD
    0
    At least...

    @wore out

    Any words of wisdom?
     
    wore out Thanks this.
  8. Dino soar

    Dino soar Road Train Member

    4,589
    21,825
    Dec 8, 2017
    0
    You have to look at with the GVW is for each. Most of the single axle Fords like that were 33,000 if they were the really heavy-duty ones. So if the truck weighed 15000 that gives you about 18,000 that you can carry.

    The tandem auto car could be a Heavy spec truck. A regular tandem generally is about 52000 lb, a heavy one could be 58000 or more depending on what year state will allow. So if it weighed 25,000 that would give you at least 27000 with 52000 GVW. Or more if it's a heavier spec.

    If it were me I would go for the caterpillar or even better I would find a truck with an l 10 or a big cam Cummins. The difference between those engines and the 6.6 and the 3208 cat is that those little engines are throw away engines. In other words the caterpillar when you rebuild it you can pull the liners out and just rebuild the engine unless you have a problem with the block. If anything happens to those little engines that they need to be rebuilt you have to pull the whole engine out and either get another one or send it to machine shop to press cylinders in it and and that's expensive and a lot more work compared to rebuilding the truck engine. Some may tell you differently but I think that the caterpillar is much more expensive to rebuild and even work on them than the big cam or L10.

    If you're not going that far I wouldn't worry as much about the mileage. A smaller truck fully loaded down moving like a slug will probably get a similar mileage as a larger engine pulling a smaller load.

    What I would really be concerned about is the automatic transmission. They tend to get worse mileage and are crazy expensive to repair if you have a problem. A regular manual transmission is better on fuel and much simpler and cheaper to repair when you need to.
     
    Bean Jr., Rideandrepair and Airman89 Thank this.
  9. Airman89

    Airman89 Light Load Member

    148
    15
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    Yeah you’re right. I kept leaning towards sacrificing the truck/engine set up because of the national crane (The GMC with 3406 has a knuckle boom which won’t be useful grabbing logs off of valleys/hills or in the woods..) but when I boils down to it I can get a crane down the road. You made my mind up, it’s the 3406.

    Now one last question. Hauling logs, could I get away with farm truck tags on it to save some on the registration? Like I said most trips will be less than 15-20 miles to pick up logs then one 110 mile (one way) trip at the end of the week.
     
    Rideandrepair Thanks this.
  10. wore out

    wore out Numbered Classic

    14,338
    173,921
    Jun 5, 2013
    CHASIN THE DEVIL'S HERD
    0
    I bet you get better than 6. I get 6.7 pulling an empty cattle pot. They are nothing less than a parachute
     
  11. Airman89

    Airman89 Light Load Member

    148
    15
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    Are farm tags out of the question on this, hailing’s logs to the mill? Technically personal property but will obviously be selling them to the mill. Not paid to transport.
     
    Rideandrepair Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.