I have been in heavy inbound areas, every load that hits the board for two or three days, and everyone of them less than .80 per mile, and not one would budge when called. Because of the sheer volume of their business, the mega carriers are profitable by only clearing a few dollars per load. If it cost more for the megas to operate, they'd be going out of business and owner operators would be flourishing. It's the opposite in today's market.
1,300 dollar fine for a glider in California
Discussion in 'Trucker Legal Advice' started by purpleprime, May 13, 2016.
Page 7 of 8
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
With big carriers they don't figure costs like a single owner operator or small fleet does. For them everything is a revenue source and feeds profit centers. They could care less what the spot market rate is, they bid work months out at flat rate contracts for "up to a certain tonnage", not even divided into specific loads, then they figure out how best to move it. Why do you think there is cheap freight on the boards, usually a large carrier is the one offering it up, either directly or thorough one of their associated brokers.
As for only saving the insurance cost, that is chump change compared to the other bulk savings they get. There are a lot of other savings when buying in bulk, from the cost of the equipment and supplies to the fuel cost. For example, most large carriers can buy their trucks new for almost what they sell them for 36 months later, meaning they used that truck for almost nothing, especially if they get a lease driver to pay for it. As for their per mile rate, they base everything on a target margin (usually 10%), meaning if they sell $1 billion dollars in services they expect to retain after all costs $100 million in pure profit, easily done when credit and equipment cost little to nothing.
Think about it, they divide their operations into profit centers such as the truck leasing division, the repair shop, the brokerage, the "trucking company", even recruiting as they will share leads on drivers with other carriers, why do you think when you submit one application you all of a sudden get 10 calls from other recruiters. For example, the garage charges back all the warranty repairs to the manufacturer (why they always have new trucks), the leasing company buys the trucks then writes off the ownership costs, and they even move a load at profit on some occasions, but actually moving freight is not where most mega carriers make their profits. Knight has a back office service company that runs the safety and administration departments of about 500 other smaller carriers, Celadon provides financing and fleet leasing to a few thousand mid size (500+ trucks) fleets, US Express provides consulting and management services for a few dozen other carriers they don't own but partner with, and so on.tsavory, John Dewart and Bean Jr. Thank this. -
"The Brokers aren't paying enough to offset added costs to upgrade my equipment to be profitable"
And I beleive it.
I sure as Heck couldn't operate or upgrade my truck to run california at what brokers can get away with do to their business 101 ethics and stranglehold strategies -
Ok, since some are convinced its the megas that pull cheap and not independents then they must have no problem with all the small carriers run by immigrants. After all, independents don't run cheap freight right?
John Dewart and CJndaTruck Thank this. -
-
-
You can have the CA market. Nothing would ever make me buy a carb compliant truck. I wouldn't buy one with any emissions bs.
RockinChair Thanks this. -
-
The article didn't say he had a glider, it said he had a new truck with an old engine.
In other words, he had apparently done an engine swap. -
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 7 of 8