Log in or Sign up
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Trucking Jobs
Truck GPS
Reviews
CDL Practice Tests
Schools
Freight Factoring
Trucking Insurance
Menu
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...
Find Trucking Jobs
Company Driver
Dry Van
Flatbed
Refrigerated
Specialized
Owner Operator
Regional Truck Driving
Dedicated Trucking
Tanker Driver
Solo Truck Driving
Local Truck Driving
Team Truck Driving
No Experience Truck Driving
Experienced Truck Driving
OTR Trucking
Intermodal Driver
Hazmat Driver
More Trucking Job Searches
⌄
Fewer Trucking Job Searches
⌃
TruckersReport.com Trucking Forum | #1 CDL Truck Driver Message Board
Forums
>
Owner Operators
>
Ask An Owner Operator
>
9400i Mack vision or pete386 HELP
>
Reply to Thread
Reply to Thread
Username:
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Ezrider_48501, post: 4557694, member: 63321"]i think part of the reason the mack visions are cheap is one dealer support. and also the vision was kinda there otr market truck witch is a market Mack has never really been to popular in. macks tend to be more popular in local and vocational application. they did put some attention into trying to biult the truck for comfort and light empty weight trying to target regional applications where a sleeper was required but still needed a stout truck and alot of these coutomers are paid by weight. (tanker, hopper, bulk) this is the main market the truck was built for</p><p><br /></p><p>my vision with a 70" midroof pusher axle 13 speed wet kit and pusher axle is only roughly 1k heavier empty than my fld with a 42" flattop 9 speed with a headache rack and wet kit installed. before the pusher was installed on the Mack the Mack was the lighter of the two trucks. the mack also gets the better fuel millage out of the two.</p><p><br /></p><p>as far as 500k inframs i didn't see much of that when i was looking not any more than any other make of truck the few odd truck here and there that suffered a low millage inframe. seemed a lot of the newer trucks of all brands were seeing quite a few lower in frame millage on all makes. my mack was in framed at 980k i have a friend that has a 06 with 1.2 mil on the original enigne. </p><p><br /></p><p>another downside to the mack is mack seems to be rather proud of there parts sometimes and many things are not available from other sources. </p><p><br /></p><p>as far as freighter goes it seems the interiors are quite sub par on the Columbia dashes half falling apart everything rattles ect. fld's however are a pretty solid truck but if your looking for a newer look i suppose the fld probably isn't in your radar. but mine has served me very well if i was in the market for another truck i wouldent hesitate to look at another fld. i do like the look of the <span style="color: #333333"><font face="Verdana">coranodo</font></span> but no personal experience with them. 60 series is a solid engine[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Ezrider_48501, post: 4557694, member: 63321"]i think part of the reason the mack visions are cheap is one dealer support. and also the vision was kinda there otr market truck witch is a market Mack has never really been to popular in. macks tend to be more popular in local and vocational application. they did put some attention into trying to biult the truck for comfort and light empty weight trying to target regional applications where a sleeper was required but still needed a stout truck and alot of these coutomers are paid by weight. (tanker, hopper, bulk) this is the main market the truck was built for my vision with a 70" midroof pusher axle 13 speed wet kit and pusher axle is only roughly 1k heavier empty than my fld with a 42" flattop 9 speed with a headache rack and wet kit installed. before the pusher was installed on the Mack the Mack was the lighter of the two trucks. the mack also gets the better fuel millage out of the two. as far as 500k inframs i didn't see much of that when i was looking not any more than any other make of truck the few odd truck here and there that suffered a low millage inframe. seemed a lot of the newer trucks of all brands were seeing quite a few lower in frame millage on all makes. my mack was in framed at 980k i have a friend that has a 06 with 1.2 mil on the original enigne. another downside to the mack is mack seems to be rather proud of there parts sometimes and many things are not available from other sources. as far as freighter goes it seems the interiors are quite sub par on the Columbia dashes half falling apart everything rattles ect. fld's however are a pretty solid truck but if your looking for a newer look i suppose the fld probably isn't in your radar. but mine has served me very well if i was in the market for another truck i wouldent hesitate to look at another fld. i do like the look of the [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Verdana]coranodo[/FONT][/COLOR] but no personal experience with them. 60 series is a solid engine[/QUOTE]
Your username or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
TruckersReport.com Trucking Forum | #1 CDL Truck Driver Message Board
Forums
>
Owner Operators
>
Ask An Owner Operator
>
9400i Mack vision or pete386 HELP
>
Reply to Thread