Citizens Against Legal and Moral Abuse, Inc.

LostSoulCA, thank you for responding. I also agree that honesty is always the best policy, but I also know that mistakes can happen. My husband put it in the back of his mind, and never wanted to think about it again. It has never been an issue with any company until now. Recruiters or anyone else that is into investigating the backgrounds of people would definitely remember there own background because they deal with it all the time. My husband hasn't had to think about it for all those years and to have it used against him for something that happened 35 years ago, wow, that is really outrageous! I am also an advocate as you probably already read, for "Citizens Againt Legal and Moral Abuse" and I think it's atrocious for Celadon to think they are so self-righteous that they want to use something like that against a driver that happened 35 years ago.

Thank you, fnlou88. It's pretty bad that the Internet us used to discredit and hurt other people like that, especially something that happened 35 years ago. You are right, if it happened before the Internet, my husband would have been hired and there would have never been an issue at all. The crime would have still been committed, but nothing would have been said of it. Other companies never had a problem with my husband's background even thogh they have had the Internet to look all that up. It's just Celadon! They are mean vicious, unforgiving and use what they can to destroy a driver's career if they get ticked off for any reason.

 

Doubledragon, it's really too bad that Celadon brought that up. Now that my husband remembers it, he will let companies know about it if it's asked on the application. I just think it's rotten for Celadon to use it against him in two ways, they wouldn't hire him and the other is threatening to put it on his DAC. We are just thankful to God that he didn't get on with Celadon after all. Not only for what they did to us, but also for what I have been reading about Celadon. It sounds like they are not at all the kind of company they like to pretend to be. They used that 35 year event against my husband, but yet, as I have read about what other drivers think about Celadon, it sounds like they are a rip off company.

If you or any other drivers out there have any suggestions on implementing a program to prevent this type of abuse such as what to do about DAC and the companies that want to ruin a driver's career using DAC, our organization would love to hear about it.

 

Chief, you are reading way more into things than what is really there. Let me spell this out for you: I said my husband made a mistake and stole something 35 years ago. We have been together for over 30 years, been married almost 30 years. Since I have been with my husband he has been a decent person, a great supporter in more ways than one, and has never and will never steal anything. Did I finally make that clear with you?

Now, to spell more out for you, Chief: Since Celadon has brought up the past of 35 years ago, we thank our lucky stars and Christ for my husband not getting hired on with a company that is that unforgiving. Is that clear with you!

 

Celadon is a company that thinks they do no wrong and everyone else has to pay the price. Well, drivers that get on with them had better be perfect or they will get fired and Celadon will try to end their career by putting things on their DAC. Is that clear with you also, Chief? The problem I have in a very big way, is that companies have no right to try to destroy a driver's career and if you disagree with that, then you must be a recruiter from Celadon.

My husband has been in charge of millions of high dollar loads and has taken care of the loads as if they were his own. He is careful what truck stop he parks at and when we go in to eat, he has stopped in the middle of eating to check on the load. A load is in the best hands when my husband is behind the wheel. I am angry, not only at Celadon, but at all companies that want to use the Dac to end a driver's career. Mo and Chief must be recruiters. Am I right about that?

Mo, I have a problem with Chief accusing me of contradicting myself. He must not be a very good reader, indeed. I just don't know how I can make myself any dlearer.

I meant, I just don't know how I can make myself any clearer. There I corrected the misspelling. Whether that will help Chief to understand, I just don't know.

 

Verify something that happened 35 years ago that never happened again. What is the matter with your thinking? Boy, you are not for the drivers, by any means. You think drivers should suffer at the hands of corrupt people that want to destroy their careers. That's pretty bad.