Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Moose1958, post: 12234198, member: 54776"]The way I have always understood post-accident testing as it depended on the situation. A carrier can send a driver to be tested under <a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-382/subpart-C/section-382.307" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-382/subpart-C/section-382.307" rel="nofollow">382.307</a> anytime a driver is on company property or driving a company vehicle and the person suspects they are high. Even if they smash a fender at the terminal. Then you get into <a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-382/subpart-C/section-382.303" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-382/subpart-C/section-382.303" rel="nofollow">382.303</a> and that rule is another chapter of a different book. However, I always have been under the impression there was a difference between a COP sending a driver to be tested and a carrier under 382.303 when it came to testing under part 40. THIS is why I generally stay out of these things and refer the person to see a good Attorney.[/QUOTE]