Lawmakers add 6-axle 91k pound weight limit pilot to highway bill

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by abyliks, May 31, 2026.

  1. abyliks

    abyliks Road Train Member

    4,227
    10,071
    May 2, 2010
    ludlow MA
    0
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. SmallPackage

    SmallPackage Road Train Member

    5,882
    18,884
    Dec 20, 2019
    Marion Texas
    0
    91,000 on 5 axles is nothing. Outlaws been doing that for 65 years. Many with or many without permits. Many of us used a one time permit multiple times. Lol. This just allows you to put on a drop axle and never have to pay for an extra permit.
     
    W923, singlescrewshaker, Oxbow and 4 others Thank this.
  4. abyliks

    abyliks Road Train Member

    4,227
    10,071
    May 2, 2010
    ludlow MA
    0
    we run 99k on 5 up here legally begin with,

    there’s also $474 billion dollars up for politicians to grab….errr “invest on the highways with”
     
  5. Diesel Dave

    Diesel Dave Last Few of the OUTLAWS

    9,924
    34,825
    Jan 20, 2010
    Hesperia, Ca.
    0
    Here in our Communist(California), it will never happen. :D This will benefit shippers, more for there money.:eek:o_O
     
    singlescrewshaker, Oxbow and Bean Jr. Thank this.
  6. Long FLD

    Long FLD Road Train Member

    13,203
    55,502
    Mar 4, 2015
    0
    As much as I like my home state of South Dakota, Dusty Johnson is an idiot. South Dakota has made it impossible for anyone to make a decent living close to home unless you own a bunch of different trailers. Can’t make money in state unless you pull sets of big doubles or run 8 axles hauling livestock, then if you have something set up to make money in your home state it’s useless outside state lines.

    For “non box” freight a higher weight limit won’t be that much of an issue as a lot of commodities pay by weight. The issues will be the box guys that will be hauling 11k more pounds and doing it for a flat rate because that’s what the shippers expect.
     
  7. Accidental Trucker

    Accidental Trucker Road Train Member

    3,464
    7,919
    Jun 4, 2015
    0
    I can get to 88 out west with a heavy front axle and a spread. Pretty close to 91 less the weight of the extra axle. I've run a tri-axle for a lot of miles, next trailer is going to be a closable spread. More flexibility for non-domestic standards like Canada and California.
     
  8. Ruthless

    Ruthless Road Train Member

    9,344
    93,541
    Aug 28, 2010
    The City.
    0
    Id like to go back to max 45’ trailers and 73,280
     
    77fib77, larry2903, stwik and 15 others Thank this.
  9. Siinman

    Siinman Road Train Member

    5,574
    14,327
    Mar 5, 2017
    Kansas City, MO.
    0
    I'M a no. We already have bad roads. No need to add more weight and yet another axle to try and spread it out. The shippers will try and push this since it could benefit them but the truckers should stay away unless it is farm stuff in my eyes. I like my light loads anyways.
     
  10. crzyjarmans

    crzyjarmans Road Train Member

    3,366
    2,525
    Jun 9, 2010
    Home
    0
    Just curious, Why do you want more weight? More weight, more fuel, more wear and tear on your equipment, id rather fight for better rates
     
  11. BoostedTeg

    BoostedTeg Road Train Member

    1,901
    3,709
    Jun 2, 2008
    Boise ID
    0
    Maybe they want the extra weight for electric trucks like Tesla and whoever else will make one.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.