Same truck..different hood.
I'd sooner have my 1,751,000 mile 379 than any new plastic POS......
On the fence - New trucks, thinking about leaving job
Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by Rat, Feb 4, 2012.
Page 6 of 17
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
For those of you that think KW is going to discontinue the W900 aparently haven't driven past the factory in Ohio, they're still selling very well. Also the W900-T800 use the same cab/sleeper as the T660 so they only thing they have to make different is the hood. If the government does mandate a fuel mileage standard it will be done by the ton mile because someone like Rat pulling a belt trailer at 100K+ shouldn't be held to the same standards as a door slammer with a load of potato chips! My 700hp W900L at 4.6mpg at 120,000# bury's the 7mpg plastic McDonalds truck for efficiency.
Some people just don't understand that small companies with 100 trucks or less don't operate the same way as the mega fleets. We buy our trucks so we care about the resale value. Most also run relatively local so maintenance is done in house so taking 2hrs to remove plastic junk so we can see the engine isn't appealing. 8mpg pulling heavy odd shaped trailers isn't possible no matter what shape your hood is.
A local fleet here with 120 trucks just traded in 8-2011 Cascadias for 8 2008 Pete's with C15's, and it wasn't because they were making too much money with the plastic trucks. I believe the owners quote was "those were the biggest POS's we've ever owned"
And as far as maintenance costs, you raise the hood of a prostar and take a picture and I'll do the same to any of my "hoods" and we'll see who's is easier to work on.
Rat, there are those on here that see the pics in your sig and seriously think "those external air cleaners are why he's not getting 8mpg" "A set of side skirts would definitely help him off road" And chances are they're holding a steering wheel for a mega fleet.
There are those of us that can differentiate between the trucks needed for someone pulling a light van OTR, and someone doing local or regional heavy haul. I owned and pulled a belly dump for a few years, the shape of my hood didn't mean squat driving 30mi one way between a gravel pit and an asphalt plant through a city. The steering wheel holder would say "absolutely the guy with the aero truck would make more money"the gambler, Lonesome, Rat and 2 others Thank this. -
I love Pete's. 359exhd, 379exhd and 389's. If i could afford to get a glider I would. But for now I'm saving up for a '98-2003 Pete. That's what i really want. But things may change in a few years. Never really know what the future holds. -
I fully understand wanting to drive the truck that YOU want. It is both your workplace, and to a certain extent, your home.
But it is still just the "tool of the job." And I just can't see quiting an otherwise good job because of not "liking" the "tool provided." Of course it is an entirely different matter, if the company does not maintain their equipment.
JMNHO.DrtyDiesel and Jfaulk99 Thank this. -
Once the Volvo's starting making an appearance I'd be looking.... -
Jfaulk, you and I know these things. The guys pulling van style trailers don't see to understand that the shape of the hood doesn't always make the difference in fuel economy. Too many things come into play especially when hauling heavy or odd shaped trailers or loads.
The 379 I am running will get better economy then some of our lowered powered aero rigs. Even though it has a POS MBN c15 in it aka bridged motor.
One thing about the truck I am running is that it does not have a super long wheel base to the tractor and the sleeper is long enough to get some of the wind off the front of the trailer since I have less gap between the sleeper and the trailer. The shorter bunks we have in the fleet also have a little longer wheel bases and have a huge gap between the trailer and the bunk. They are mostly Volvos and 386s. Loaded they can't even touch 5 mpg. The ones I drove got just a tad over 4 mpg loaded.
So the company is not really saving anything by going with the less then 60 inch bunks and slope nosed hoods.
The only time them aero trucks will really kill the 379 in economy is when they hook to a van style trailer. But then we don't hook to them very often and then it is only to shuttle product from the local plant to a cold storage facility near by. Then we are only loaded for about 80K also.
I have seen what happens to trucks that the drivers hate. I have seen what happens to trucks that drivers like. I will tell you right now, I would much rather be in a truck that a driver liked then a truck that a driver hated and only treated it as a tool to do a job. They get washed twice a year if the truck is lucky, crap is falling off of them almost daily, the insides are treated like a garbage dump. I can go to the yard and pick out atleast 25 new aero trucks that look older then the 04 379 that I am running.
I know of atleast 10 drivers that want the truck I am running and they are running newer 386s, and Volvos. I have even had some drivers think they are going to take the truck I am running. They have even gone as far as packing up my stuff and moving their stuff into the truck. That went over like a bull in a china shop. I finally had to pull the spare keys off the board in the office and keep them in my pocket at all times as per the bosses orders.
Don't get me wrong, if the boss needs to use the truck because a truck is in the shop, all he does is call me for the keys. But he gives the driver orders that the truck is not to be left dirty in side and it WILL be cleaned of any trash before it gets parked.
I have used other trucks also when mine was in the shop and they were ALWAYS cleaner when I got out of them then they were before I got in them. I am talking fully detailed inside.
Krooser, you hit the nail on the head! A truck , even a company truck, is more then just a tool to many of us. It is our rolling home away from home along with a toy.the gambler and Lonesome Thank this. -
I thought about leaving my job recently because of our switch seating and how guys pig up a truck for the next guy, welp starting next week I'll have my assigned truck (the oldest truck in the fleet, 05 w900).
-
You complain about small sleepers but take pride and joy in that old 379? At 3.5 MPG your lucky they didn't send that truck away long ago.
When it comes to company trucks I am all about smooth ride, versatility, interior space and comfort. These are things severely lacking in every PACAAR product that I've had the misfortune of driving. Sure the 379 and W900 look sharp going down the road. The 387 is the only thing PACAAR close to tolerable for me.
I can drive as good as the next guy, but who honestly enjoys going to that ###### dock in new jersey designed for pup trailers, or that construction site with tight turns, mudholes, and ###### laying all over the place, in a truck that has the turning radius of a Carnival Cruise Ship?
I always hear Pete and KW guys talk about "road feel". If road feel means feeling every hairline crack and acorn laying in the road and making me fly off my seat, you can keep your Pacaar POS.
Call me crazy, but my favorite truck so far was a Cascadia I drove in 2008. It was not the most attractive thing on the road, especially in our companies colors, but it turned on a dime and rode like a Cadillac. And I could wake up in the morning without worrying about bumping my head climbing into the cab. There were a few things I didn't like about it, it had some electrical issues at first, like most bottom end Freightshakers it was cheap and chintzy, but at the end of a long drive I was a lot less tired sore than the times I was stuck in a Pete or KW.
Ok, Ill step down from the soapbox now... -
Here ya go RAT, tell them they will retain you for the next xx amount of years, all they have to do is go buy this over a Prostar....
DrtyDiesel, Lonesome and Rat Thank this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 6 of 17