Log in or Sign up
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Trucking Jobs
Truck GPS
Reviews
CDL Practice Tests
Schools
Freight Factoring
Trucking Insurance
Menu
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...
Find Trucking Jobs
Company Driver
Dry Van
Flatbed
Refrigerated
Specialized
Owner Operator
Regional Truck Driving
Dedicated Trucking
Tanker Driver
Solo Truck Driving
Local Truck Driving
Team Truck Driving
No Experience Truck Driving
Experienced Truck Driving
OTR Trucking
Intermodal Driver
Hazmat Driver
More Trucking Job Searches
⌄
Fewer Trucking Job Searches
⌃
TruckersReport.com Trucking Forum | #1 CDL Truck Driver Message Board
Forums
>
Good & Bad Trucking Companies
>
Experienced Truckers' Advice
>
Own Authority back office work load vs when you were Leased on to Carrier
>
Reply to Thread
Reply to Thread
Username:
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Chieftains, post: 12111903, member: 320622"]People try to complicate back office work.</p><p>It's simple. Just don't miss deadlines. </p><p>Ifta keep records every month. </p><p>Billing is max 5mins from your cellphone if they will accept pictures of POD.</p><p><br /></p><p>Compliance is nonexistent. </p><p>As was said tires are cheaper when you have a local connect.</p><p><br /></p><p>Fuel I use Mudflap . Works in my area. Midwest[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Chieftains, post: 12111903, member: 320622"]People try to complicate back office work. It's simple. Just don't miss deadlines. Ifta keep records every month. Billing is max 5mins from your cellphone if they will accept pictures of POD. Compliance is nonexistent. As was said tires are cheaper when you have a local connect. Fuel I use Mudflap . Works in my area. Midwest[/QUOTE]
Your username or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
TruckersReport.com Trucking Forum | #1 CDL Truck Driver Message Board
Forums
>
Good & Bad Trucking Companies
>
Experienced Truckers' Advice
>
Own Authority back office work load vs when you were Leased on to Carrier
>
Reply to Thread