How did they come up with the number 300, 000? That's a pretty large number. Did any of you participate in this study? They didn't have me pee, or interview me, or whatever. These studies kill me because I dont see how a sample size tells the story.
Study- 300,000 truckers would lose their job
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by Dino soar, Jul 17, 2020.
Page 3 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
No problem, I just get to say where the hair comes from,,oh, btw, I just ate 2 greasy burritos half an hour ago,,
-
Bring it on. This is the greatest news we have heard all year
Michael H, Casimir66, JonJon78 and 1 other person Thank this. -
-
Why stop with truck drivers? Make everybody take this test to get a license and also after every accident or major ticket such as texting while driving or reckless driving.
How could this not improve traffic on the roads? -
Brettj3876, TripleSix, alds and 1 other person Thank this.
-
In actuality, he's trying to get you to pay top dollar for a car that's valued at 50% of what they are selling it to you for. But yet, he has you feeling like he's doing you a favor!
One of the biggest dangers that I see to trucking nowadays is how SUBMISSIVE and DOCILE newer drivers are. These bottom feeding ambulance chasing lawyers are not good lawyers. They are the bottom of the barrel when it comes to law. The thing is, they don't have to be good at their craft when truck drivers are beaten into submission. Easy pickings! There have been a couple threads where some driver posts about having an accident and when you ask about pictures, the driver will say, "Well, the motorist was irate and the cop told me to stay inside my cab for safety and he would take the pictures." Driver, that cop just PORKED you. Pictures would have easily proven that you were not at fault, but because you didn't get any, you now have no proof.
"But Six, what was I supposed to do...disobey the cop???"
CYA, dumascan! Homeboy hit you, get pictures. Cop tells you to stay in your cab for your safety, you tell that cop that that's his responsibility to maintain order and you commence to taking pictures. If he can't do his job, he should call for backup. Your pictures need to tell your side of the story.
Had a woman accuse me of backing up on her car in stop and go traffic. I was aimed downhill. Made absolutely sure to get pics of my truck aimed downhill. You ain't never seen a truck that was aimed downhill roll backwards by accident. Impossible. I made certain to get picture to show that I was aimed downhill.Brettj3876, Lite bug, AModelCat and 3 others Thank this. -
The guy did wake up in the ambulance after accident asking the paramedics how bad was it ?!
Dont worry , some scratches on the right leg !
Can i see it ?!
Unfortunately the leg in the other car !D.Tibbitt Thanks this. -
Just because the Supreme Court says it can be done does not mean that it is in accordance with the Constitution. It means that you have judges that interpreted it incorrectly or had pressure to interpret it a certain way.
If they attempted to do that to the general population they would have more lawsuits than they could count and it would definitely be shot down.
Remember drug testing was only supposed to make sure the drivers were not under the influence when they got into a truck. But you see now how since they've gotten over that legal hurdle now it has become well if you've ever done anything now you will be disqualified and you will be penalized.
Like the breakdown of any society the breakdown of laws always begin with Public Safety or something of that nature....
If you would have told the founding fathers that there's going to be one group of people, one group, and we're going to monitor them on their off-duty time to make certain they're not doing something that the government feels they should not be doing, and they're doing that in the name of Public Safety...
The founding fathers would have said positively not. That is not the society that we are creating we want government out of our business.
I'm not going to mention names or political parties because I don't want this to turn political but there are certain politicians that now are beginning to push that the Second Amendment does not mean that individually you have the right to bear arms. It means that the state itself can defend you as a militia but you yourself don't personally have the right to carry a gun or own a gun.
Over time many things change in a way that they're not supposed to.
Yet it still happens.Brettj3876, TokyoJoe and Lite bug Thank this. -
bryan21384 Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 3 of 4