Username:

Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GreenPete359, post: 12208784, member: 206015&quot;]The article has nothing to do with it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Read the article, the defendant’s trailer was being pulled by another motor carrier. He would have had no ability to install a camera in the tractor that had the accident.</p><p><br /></p><p>The owner of the trucking company should have given the load back when his truck broke down, or told the trucking company he gave the load to they needed to us their own trailer.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>**On a side note, cameras are reactive not proactive. All the camera would have done was possibly catch the driver playing with his phone, not that it was needed as it seems to already be a proven fact that him playing with his phone was the cause of the accident.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your username or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?