Username:

Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;brian991219, post: 8400041, member: 122252&quot;]Short answer, no, your combination does not meet the definition of an automobile transporter. Most states will classify you as a flatbed with a divisible load, which eliminates any overhang. I will break it down further as below (NN is the National Network of highways includes US Routes and Interstates)</p><p><br /></p><p>NJ no overhang, 53&#039; trailers allowed BUT anything over 96&quot; wide is only allowed on NN and 102 routes</p><p><br /></p><p>NY no overhang either end of trailer or up to total length of 53&#039; cargo</p><p><br /></p><p>CT no overhang, 48&#039; trailer on all roads except NN, 65&#039; overall extreme length for truck-trailer combos</p><p><br /></p><p>RI appears to allow 3&#039; to front of power unit, 4&#039; to rear of trailer, no 53&#039; trailers off NN, 41&#039; kingpin to rear axle</p><blockquote><p>They don&#039;t have a clear definition of auto transporter or divisible load. I may be wrong though.</p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>MA I am not sure about, can&#039;t find my clear guidance sheet for them</p><p><br /></p><p>PA no overhang, 65&#039; extreme bumper to bumper on combinations off the NN, also 96&quot; width off the NN[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your username or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?