Truck review: Mack Anthem daycab and 70" sleeper

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by striker, Jul 14, 2018.

  1. striker

    striker Road Train Member

    5,906
    6,186
    Aug 8, 2009
    Denver, Co
    0
    Few years ago I posted a review of a new Mack truck equipped with a then new M-Drive automatic transmission. Recently, Bruckner Mack in Denver brought us a couple of new trucks to demo, this time around it's a pre-build 2018 Mack Anthem daycab and ready for sale 2019 Mack Anthem 70" condo.

    One item on both trucks, all Mack anthem tractors come standard with power windows and power locks, depending on the package level they will also have a remote lock/unlock standard. The trucks come in basic, ultra and premium trim.

    First off the daycab. I was originally told this was a pre-build truck and not for sale, but it turned out it was actually already sold to a farmer in Kansas, but they were letting several customers demo it for a few weeks before he would take delivery. The day cab is a 4x2 configuration, equipped with super singles and a tag axle setup, 11 liter MP7 motor spec'd at 400 hp but turned up to 455 hp (more on this later), I'm not sure the gears and an M-Drive transmission
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    In this picture, I drove the truck for two days, day 1 I ran out to a customer in Burlington, Co. with a 20' can on a 3 axle chassis to pick up 44K of millet, the second day I took the truck to a customer in Rifle, Co. to pick up 40,000 lbs of sodium bicarbonate.

    It's very nice truck, with a redesigned interior, totally new layout for everything.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    I didn't take as good a pic of the steering wheel and stalks as I thought I did. Mack has changed and moved things around.

    The left stalk controls the turnsignals, hi beam (push down), flash to pass (lift up), windshield wipers and a button on the end to control trailer light flash. The headlight controls also now have a push button for the hazards below them (barely visible), my advice to Mack, it needs to be moved to the right side of the dash and given it's own button, where it's at, it's very difficult to use. At the railroads I have to use them constantly and where it's located, it's inconvenient and several times I had to hit multiple times to get them to turn on.

    The right stalk, barely visible, controls the engine brakes (lo, med, hi, max) and as well as the guard dog digital display controls.

    The gauge layout feature the tach on the left, with three small gauges for DEF tank, coolant and oil pressure, in the middle is the guard dog digital display which features all your other readouts, odometer, trip meters, etc., on the right side is the speedo, and below it are 3 gauges for fuel and primary/secondary air systems. Surrounding both gauges are multiple idiot lights, Parking brake, ABS lights, Neutral and Reverse indicator, and various other warning lights.

    To the right side of the dash is the trans selector, below that is the radio (optional later in the year is a larger stereo equipped with
    GPS and other telematics, the radios are all Sirius/Xm ready as well as Bluetooth, AUX and USB plugs. To the right of that are the various other switches. The long black piece is currently just a pocket for pens, but in the future Mack will be offering an additional gauge package that will install there. HVAC controls are easy to use and work well.

    Mack is now making it optional to be equipped with blind spot warning (in the pic of the right side, you can see a pod mounted inside the grab handle, that's the light for the blind spot monitor) and forward collision warning. Both are a royal PITA, I despised both, the blindspot monitor is extremely distracting at night, when this bright yellow light comes on. The collision avoidance cannot be turned off, it works in conjunction with the cruise control, regular brakes, engine brakes and throttle. You can override it manually, but once you get to a certain closing distance, it starts beeping at you, very loudly and overriding the stereo, you can adjust the distance via a button, but it doesn't matter, in the city you pretty have to turn the radio off as it becomes worthless.

    For those that are curious, this truck weighs just under 15,000 lbs in this setup, with a total of 150 gal capacity.

    The 11 liter, Mp7 works very well on the plains, it had no trouble pulling the empty container at speed upto 80 mph (thanks Mack), returning to Denver at 74,000 (with 44,000 in the box) it had no problems, although getting up to 75 mph took longer than I liked, and pulling most grades was an issue.

    The second day, I took it and a 53' container to a customer in Rifle, Co. to pick up 40,000 lbs of sodium bicarbonate. The drive from Denver to Rifle on I-70 wasn't bad, empty of course, the truck pulled the hills and had no problem on the down hill. However, once loaded, I worked that little 11 liter way too hard, trans was in 6th gear and low teens climbing Vail and Eisenhower, in fact climbing Vail the whole engine was getting so hot it actually started to override the A/C and blow hot air. Dropping down Genesse into Denver, the engine brakes were not happy on that long grade, it's definitely better suited for the plains.

    Now for the sleeper.

    What can I say, I love this truck. This is a totally redesigned setup, a departure from the old as Mack says. Everything is new. In the 3 days I've driven this truck, it constantly gets compliments, at one truck stop in Torrington, Wyo. I came out to find 6 or 7 drivers looking it over, and a couple climbing inside to take a look after I unlocked it.

    Mack calls it Cobalt Blue, most people call it Royal blue, I can say that clean it's very bright blue, they will see you coming.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    This new front end, you either love it or hate it, I've had a few people say it looks like a transformer coming down the road.

    [​IMG]

    Mack gave me this truck with 59 miles on it, as of Friday I've put 1,098 miles on it, and still get to drive it one more day. This truck is equipped with a Mack MP8 505 hp engine, M-Drive transmission and all Mack driveline, twin 100 gallon tanks.

    I will say, this truck gets pretty good mileage all things considered. My first day running it, I went from Denver to Morrill, Ne. and back, up empty, back at 73,000 gross. I averaged 7.3 mpg, running 69 mph heading to Morrill, and 6.5 coming back. This drive is a lot of up and down, I pretty much had my foot in it for most of the drive. On true flat lands, 9 mpg could probably easily be had with an aero package trailer, maybe 10 mpg depending on conditions and setup.

    This truck is also equipped with a collision avoidance system (but not the blindspot monitoring), I really really despise this system, I've already told my bosses I don't care what kind of
    insurance discount we could get, do not order it, I suspect several of my coworkers would quit.

    Let me say upfront, I've never been a true OTR driver, so I'm not sure what to expect in the interior of a large sleeper like this. I've always had 48" or 56", the first one my company bought me specifically was a 56" condo that Mack used to make. This truck, with the 70" condo is designed for an O/O or a company driver to be out for a long time. Lots of closet space, storage compartments, cubby holes a large cabinet for a tv, as well as a flat screen mount, refrigerator and a pull out desk top (I'll post pics of the sleeper below)

    TBC...……………….
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2018
    D.Tibbitt, DUNE-T, larry2903 and 5 others Thank this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. striker

    striker Road Train Member

    5,906
    6,186
    Aug 8, 2009
    Denver, Co
    0
    Part 2:
    The sleeper
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    It is equipped with an APU, I have no idea how to work it so I haven't bothered

    [​IMG]

    The three days I've driven this truck, aside from the collision avoidance, it's very easy to drive and handle. One day I went to Torrington, the next day I went to Rifle, Co. and the 3rd day I spent in the city, this next week I'll drive it Monday back in the mountains and then hand it off to a coworker for 2 days.

    The dash and controls on this are very similar to the day cab, on the right side of the steering wheel is the stereo controls, on the left are the cruise control. The left and right stalks contains the same controls as the day cab.

    [​IMG]


    The one difference on this truck, aside from being a twin screw with no tag axle, this truck is equipped with an air release king pin unlock, instead of manually pulling the handle. It works well, but, takes some getting used to. It will only work if all brakes are set and the truck is in neutral, if any of the brakes are released or the truck is in gear, it will not activate (I tried several times in our yard with empties)

    This truck weighs 19,540 with just slightly under full tanks of fuel.
    If they could figure out a way to shave 1,000 lbs off this truck, I'd be begging my bosses to buy me one.

    A couple of add-on notes, both trucks have disc brakes, man are those nice, they definitely stop smoother than drum brakes, I noticed dropping of Vail and Eisenhower, I didn't feel as much brake fade. Because the blue truck is so new, the engine brakes, while they worked, felt a little soft so I had to use more foot brake.
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2018
  4. Oldironfan

    Oldironfan Road Train Member

    5,777
    5,538
    May 22, 2017
    0
    It's a volvo under the cab is all Volvo. That's all I have to say. Ecm is tuned a little different that's it.
     
    Trucking in Tennessee Thanks this.
  5. Rollr4872

    Rollr4872 Light Load Member

    130
    135
    Feb 5, 2018
    0
    I’ve seen one or two Mack anthems down by me, and whenever I do they seem to peak my interest. It doesn’t seem like there’s a whole lot of information on them out there currently so it’s cool to finally get a somewhat in depth review on them. I can’t stand the look of the hood mirrors and the headlights and hood took a while to grow on me but overall it seems like a pretty interesting truck.
     
  6. Bean Jr.

    Bean Jr. Road Train Member

    5,337
    9,355
    Mar 30, 2014
    0
    It's actually 6x2 and it's pusher axle.

    Great review.
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2018
    striker and Oldironfan Thank this.
  7. freebeertomorrow

    freebeertomorrow Heavy Load Member

    906
    1,703
    Mar 19, 2016
    Indiana
    0
    one thing i can say about the mp7 is they need some miles on them before they run very well. they seem to want around 250k miles before running well. we have about 30 day cabs ranging from 2012-2018. most are 10 spd. for some reason the autos don’t pull near as well as the manual trans trucks. not even close, despite having more gears and hundreds of thousands less miles. my 2013 10 spd with 780k on it will make a new auto truck look silly. something that’s odd is the autos are roughly 2 mph slower at speed.

    i will say i think that anthem is a good looking truck. i wonder if we will get any. regardless - all of the new trucks they get in are autos so i’m holding onto mine until they force me out of it. and yes, that mack collision mitigation system is horrible...the beeping and such. another reason i will keep my “old” one as long as i can.
     
    striker Thanks this.
  8. dieselViking

    dieselViking Light Load Member

    100
    226
    Jan 13, 2016
    Massachusetts
    0
    I love the new design of the Mack Anthems. I hated the Pinnacle day cabs, the cabs were way too small. Being 6' with broad shoulders you were squeezed up against the door and no room to move the seat back more, was very uncomfortable. The granite had more room in the cab.

    Right now, I'm in the market for 4 new trucks 3 day cabs and a sleeper(team truck). I'm currently in a toss up between KW(780), Volvo (I really like the new VNR), and Mack has entered the running because of the Anthem. Tough choices.
     
    striker Thanks this.
  9. daf105paccar

    daf105paccar Road Train Member

    6,564
    7,292
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    Striker,from the picture it looks like the pusher lifts?
    How did you like that setup?
     
  10. striker

    striker Road Train Member

    5,906
    6,186
    Aug 8, 2009
    Denver, Co
    0
    Yes, it lifts, in the picture they were still loading me. As soon as I was loaded and started the truck, as the air ride came up to level, it dropped the pusher to the ground.

    It was interesting, a couple of issues I see with it, with super singles at times it felt squirrelly, I would rather that the drive axle had tandems and the lift had a super single. According to Mack this is an option. As I pointed out to my boss, and to Mack, this is a weird configuration for out here in Colorado, if the truck is going to run the mountains in this configuration, the driver will have to carry 3-rail chains, as this truck would be a single drive.
     
    daf105paccar Thanks this.
  11. striker

    striker Road Train Member

    5,906
    6,186
    Aug 8, 2009
    Denver, Co
    0
    The hood mirrors do suck, the low beams on the headlights are powerful enough that I actually never use the high beams.

    I would advise stopping by any Mack dealer that has one in stock and crawling all over it, some will probably let you take it for a test drive.
     
    Rollr4872 Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.