Username:

Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RedForeman, post: 12054471, member: 59766&quot;]That being the case, its nonsense since the coverage only protects the contractor&#039;s employees against injury at the workplace, wherever that happens to be. There&#039;s no logic a being AI on a WC policy, unless it&#039;s a shady attempt at getting your own employees covered or using someone else&#039;s WC policy to fulfill a requirement on something else. I would expect any WC agent or company to reject this request.</p><p><br /></p><p>Assuming no bad intent, I can only guess the carrier is trying to insulate against extended liability. Seems like a less awkward approach would be a GL or umbrella policy that the carrier would have. If they were too cheap to pay for it, it could always be added to the list of deductions on the lease agreement somewhere for consideration. Crazy part is GL isn&#039;t that expensive.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your username or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?