Log in or Sign up
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Trucking Jobs
Truck GPS
Reviews
CDL Practice Tests
Schools
Freight Factoring
Trucking Insurance
Menu
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...
Find Trucking Jobs
Company Driver
Dry Van
Flatbed
Refrigerated
Specialized
Owner Operator
Regional Truck Driving
Dedicated Trucking
Tanker Driver
Solo Truck Driving
Local Truck Driving
Team Truck Driving
No Experience Truck Driving
Experienced Truck Driving
OTR Trucking
Intermodal Driver
Hazmat Driver
More Trucking Job Searches
⌄
Fewer Trucking Job Searches
⌃
TruckersReport.com Trucking Forum | #1 CDL Truck Driver Message Board
Forums
>
The Garage
>
Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]
>
Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Mechanics Forum
>
Wabco On Guard CMS Breaking for Signs and Bridges
>
Reply to Thread
Reply to Thread
Username:
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="MWTechGuy, post: 12204409, member: 338636"]The government and OEMs did do a study on that. The synopsis was that the systems aren't perfect, they do have false positives and would like to see the tech improve. But overall road safety (collisions/fatalities/accident-insurance costs) were lower with the systems than without. One of the big challenges it notes is driver acceptance, so that would suggest they know it's making some drivers mad, and they would like to see that fixed:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-avoidance/office-crash-avoidance-research-technical-publications" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-avoidance/office-crash-avoidance-research-technical-publications" rel="nofollow">Office of Crash Avoidance Research Technical Publications | NHTSA</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/document/report-field-study-heavy-vehicle-crash-avoidance-systems" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/document/report-field-study-heavy-vehicle-crash-avoidance-systems" rel="nofollow">Report: Field Study of Heavy-Vehicle Crash Avoidance Systems, | NHTSA</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/812247b-lanedeparturewarningsystems.pdf" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/812247b-lanedeparturewarningsystems.pdf" rel="nofollow">Large-Scale Field Test of Forward Collision Alert and Lane Departure Warning Systems (nhtsa.gov)</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="MWTechGuy, post: 12204409, member: 338636"]The government and OEMs did do a study on that. The synopsis was that the systems aren't perfect, they do have false positives and would like to see the tech improve. But overall road safety (collisions/fatalities/accident-insurance costs) were lower with the systems than without. One of the big challenges it notes is driver acceptance, so that would suggest they know it's making some drivers mad, and they would like to see that fixed: [URL='https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-avoidance/office-crash-avoidance-research-technical-publications']Office of Crash Avoidance Research Technical Publications | NHTSA[/URL] [URL='https://www.nhtsa.gov/document/report-field-study-heavy-vehicle-crash-avoidance-systems']Report: Field Study of Heavy-Vehicle Crash Avoidance Systems, | NHTSA[/URL] [URL='https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/812247b-lanedeparturewarningsystems.pdf']Large-Scale Field Test of Forward Collision Alert and Lane Departure Warning Systems (nhtsa.gov)[/URL][/QUOTE]
Your username or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
TruckersReport.com Trucking Forum | #1 CDL Truck Driver Message Board
Forums
>
The Garage
>
Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]
>
Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Mechanics Forum
>
Wabco On Guard CMS Breaking for Signs and Bridges
>
Reply to Thread