does anyone have an opinion on a 1989 ravens maxim flatbed

Discussion in 'Flatbed Trucking Forum' started by dnmuskrat, Dec 9, 2012.

  1. dnmuskrat

    dnmuskrat Bobtail Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    east coast
    0
    trying to decide between an 89 ravens magnum and a 97 reitnoeur
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2012
  2. Logan76

    Logan76 Crusty In Training

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,528
    Thanks Received:
    17,698
    Location:
    kittanning, PA
    0
    Both of them are 48x102?

    what kind of wheels are on them?

    Tires? brakes?

    how are the frames and decks? any cracks? cross members bent?

    Both reitnour and ravens are great companies and the only 2 places I would personally buy a trailer from, but everyone has their own preferences.
     
  3. dnmuskrat

    dnmuskrat Bobtail Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    east coast
    0
    both are 48x96 both in good shape just wonderin if the aluminum deteriorates over time since the ravens is an 89
     
  4. Hanadarko

    Hanadarko Independent Owner/Operator

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Thanks Received:
    927
    Location:
    Midwest
    0
    If the cost is the same...then the 1997 would be a better deal as it's newer. Reitnoeur is considered one of the best.
    I almost bought one but opted for a Fontaine Renegade instead...
    Reitnoeur parts can be expensive....at least that's what I was told..

    FYI: A 1989 trailer is already considered 24 yrs old....
     
  5. dnmuskrat

    dnmuskrat Bobtail Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    east coast
    0
    the ravens is in little better shape because was used by an owner operator. only the age concerns me if it was steel i would not be concerned
     
  6. rbht

    rbht Heavy Load Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    888
    Thanks Received:
    525
    Location:
    CT,NH
    0
    The Ravens should be fine. I would not be conserned about the alum i would be more concerned if it was steel. How is the arch? I know guys running alum trailers in the 80's, both flats and dumps with no issues.
     
    dnmuskrat Thanks this.
  7. Cummins_444

    Cummins_444 Medium Load Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    Messages:
    605
    Thanks Received:
    1,014
    Location:
    Northwest, IN
    0
    The reitnouer is the better trailer of the two. The reitnouer is easy to fix anything on. Everything bolts on. How are the bushings? Corrosion between the suspension boxes and the frame?
     
    dnmuskrat Thanks this.
  8. special-k

    special-k Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,523
    Thanks Received:
    3,258
    Location:
    Southern Ontario Canada
    0
    If price is comparable go with the 97. Aluminum does have a fatigue life and 24 years is getting up there. Plus a lot of old aluminum trailers are heavy. A friend had an old Ravens that weighed 11,000 lbs. It was a good strong trailer but it weighed the same a new combo! It depends on what the trailers hauled also if the new only hauled 50,000lbs coils and the old one hauled insulation that changes a lot.
     
    dnmuskrat Thanks this.
  9. dnmuskrat

    dnmuskrat Bobtail Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    east coast
    0
    there is corrosion between the suspension boxes and 5th wheel plate
     
  10. Flatbedn

    Flatbedn Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,307
    Thanks Received:
    784
    Location:
    Missouri
    0
    I pull a 2005 ravens with an 07 volvo vnl 640 and with my ###### and all my stuff in here plus chain rack and 3 boxes on the trailer my empty weight is 29000. I sometimes forget there is a trailer back there when empty.
     
    dnmuskrat Thanks this.