FL Classic XL versus Peterbilt 379

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by tommymonza, Jul 18, 2015.

  1. icsheeple

    icsheeple Trailing the Herd

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,548
    Thanks Received:
    2,552
    Location:
    Kansas City, KS
    0
    I agree. I have an after market seat, and do think it doesn't allow me the space the stock would, but the accelerator pedal should still be way more to the right. Not enough space for the ol family jewels.
     
  2. bobbyhill

    bobbyhill Light Load Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    168
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Location:
    Left Lane
    0
    Well bean I've worked on my fair share of them an I like a Pete but I will admit the door mounted mirror setup is not the greatest it traps moisture an catches wind which keeps a load on the door, drove one last week you could stick your fingers through the top gap at 70
     
    Pysc11 Thanks this.
  3. Captain Canuck

    Captain Canuck "Captain of the Ship"

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Thanks Received:
    541
    Location:
    Woodstock, NB, Canada
    0
    I've never owned a Classic, but I've driven a couple. I could not believe how rough they rode. I also hated how the passenger side mirror was basically useless. The dash looked cheap. I owned a 2006 Pete 379. Rode like a dream, but it developed water leaks around the horn mounts on the roof of the cab, and their rear sleeper mount design needs a rethink. Aluminum on steel is begging for rust jacking problems. In fact, one of the sleeper mounts on my Pete tore out for exactly that reason. Not a lot of headroom as you move from the cab to the sleeper, and yeah, the space between the seats is pretty tight. Given a choice, I'd take the Pete over the Classic if for no other reason than to give my butt and my back a break.
     
  4. Bean Jr.

    Bean Jr. Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,548
    Thanks Received:
    9,892
    0
    I will find out. My next should be a W9, after all these years of wanting one.
     
  5. bigguns

    bigguns Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,846
    Thanks Received:
    6,854
    Location:
    Omega,GA
    0
    Really? I've been screwing up for years. I buy only W9s. Now I gotta sell a bunch of junk! Too soon old / too late smart. Ah well. Sheet happens.
     
  6. 2fuzy

    2fuzy Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,053
    Thanks Received:
    324
    Location:
    Granite Canon,WY
    0
    little late to the party but in reality not much it is mostly myth and they are technically comparable trucks and a lot of it is personal preference and most is the same as the fact that you can get twice as much for the same wine out of a box if you stick a fancy label on it
    Real value vs. perceived value such as the pete rides better when in fact the std pete and frht 4 bag systems are darn near the same system the pete has an excellent suspension that is why freightliner copied it
    there are a few things pete would have done well to copy from frht such as they have the best wiring in any truck etc...this could go on and on
    but after having owned at least one of about all of them one time or another if I won the lottery I would buy a w9 (best cab constuction ) on a pete 4 bag with rockwell rears and and s60 detroit with a 13spd eaton
    I don't see that happening so I think I will just keep running my old classic tell I am done
     
    tommymonza Thanks this.
  7. lester

    lester Midwest's #1 Feed Hauler

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    2,935
    Thanks Received:
    7,940
    Location:
    NW, Iowa
    0
    We've got a 96 377 pete, doors still shut nice, new weather striping and they'd be tight. Also had a 96 and 97 fld, slam the doors hard as you can and maybe the latch tight but not likely.

    I've sat in a few newer w-9s. Liked the dash layout, but the darn go pedal was so light to the touch seemed like I'd have to use my big toe to be easy on it. And it sits so parallel to the floor. I suppose it takes getting used to
     
  8. tommymonza

    tommymonza Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2013
    Messages:
    4,519
    Thanks Received:
    12,849
    Location:
    S.W. Florida
    0
    You could give old Miss Jenners Doc a call, Maybe get a 2fer on getting the Jewels reduced . be comfortable than ?
     
    icsheeple Thanks this.
  9. Cottonmouth85

    Cottonmouth85 Bad Influence

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,637
    Thanks Received:
    8,701
    Location:
    Floresville, Tx
    0
    Usually drive in house shoes and yeah I use my big toe. Haha

    Love the dash layout. Much better than the pre 06 models I've seen. Could do without everything being controlled by a CECU but everything is going that way.

    Been a Pete driver my entire career. Never drove a freightliner more than 500 miles. Didn't care for it. Don't like the construction or the layout.
     
  10. dirthaller

    dirthaller Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,116
    Thanks Received:
    13,089
    Location:
    Coloratah
    0
    I've been An O/O since 1998. I've owned 2 KW's and 3 Petes. I'm currently driving a 2014 389 that I ordered/bought new. KW is waaay better quality. Somewhere out there, my 1993 KW is running around out there with no rattles or squeaks and a cab so air tight that you gotta roll down the window a crack to shut the door. Had a 2007 W9 I recently sold that was the same way. My new Pete has lots of rattles and squeaks and don't even think about a pressure washer at the top of the doors or your gonna get wet. However this thing rides better than my pickup (air ride front end) and is so comfortable that you can drive 700 miles without getting out, if you have an iron blatter. Can't get comfortable in a KW. In my 07 W9, I removed the seat and bolted it further back in the cab to get my legs comfortable......then I was REACHING for the steering wheel and the rocker switches. Comparing a Shaker with a Pete as far as quality might be apples to apples, but comparing a KW to either is apples to oranges. KW is better.
     
    bigguns Thanks this.