Screw loves and their mandatory mask #### . Another 1 bites the dust.

The guy sitting next to me in the can at The J this morning is hocking up loogies and spitting them on the floor lmfao.

 

We understand that some people are citing our Perspective article (published on April 1 at NEJM.org)1 as support for discrediting widespread masking. In truth, the intent of our article was to push for more masking, not less. It is apparent that many people with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or presymptomatic yet highly contagious and that these people account for a substantial fraction of all transmissions.2,3 Universal masking helps to prevent such people from spreading virus-laden secretions, whether they recognize that they are infected or not.4

- https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2020836​

 

Who is "we"?

 

lol in this case you Dave. Didn't you just say it?

 

No. I quoted the article. Who is we that says it means something else?

 

Michael Klompas, M.D., M.P.H.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Charles A. Morris, M.D., M.P.H.
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

Erica S. Shenoy, M.D., Ph.D.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Since publication of their article, the authors report no further potential conflict of interest.

This letter was published on June 3, 2020, at NEJM.org.

 

Yes. After someone threatened to cut off the money.

 

Where is the proof off your statement?

 

The proof is in the original article they published.