Swift Academy Licenses Suspended

Discussion in 'Motor Carrier Questions - The Inside Scoop' started by tony282003, Jan 9, 2009.

  1. TruckrsWife

    TruckrsWife Significant Otter

    3,208
    42,582
    Aug 29, 2008
    God's Country, CA
    0
    And who is the third party tester?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. rikdev50s

    rikdev50s Medium Load Member

    685
    170
    Aug 12, 2008
    Greer, SC
    0
    To your point. The contractor was found to be at fault, His inspector is also at fault. So in this case it would be right to sue both. Now All the facts are not in so saying, Sue Swift is sort of like putting the buggy before the horse. Facts we need to know. Who hired the third party testers, The State of TN, or Swift? Were they directed to insure they (the testers) were TDOT certified? Who fail to act in good faith? Was there gross negligence? If so who isat fault? Now until these few facts can be determined, all else is just so much smoke. Prove where the fire is then and only then can you have a legitement suit.
     
  4. wjf1957

    wjf1957 Bobtail Member

    10
    4
    Dec 29, 2008
    Sherman, NY
    0
    still working on format for web sight for us to compare notes . driver who have ben or will be notified please keep in mind home state DMV is just the messenger.Not always a good plan to shoot the messenger no matter how much you would like to . Some time its the court of public opion that can and often the case is tried first. sometimes that outcome is by far more troublesome than a bunch of legal stuff. I was in tn MOnday 1/26 a driver from werner told me of a newspaper artical in his local paper on all of this. Drivers level heads and GOOD sound advise is best coures at this point keep good notes and all docs. recieved when the time is right then present them factually accurately . to all of this there is a reason we all will have to wait till the fat lady has sung . hopfully till then we can keep it in limelite. Trucking is not a job but an adventure and not for the faint of heart. but surly do add color and spice to life
     
    tony282003 Thanks this.
  5. tony282003

    tony282003 Light Load Member

    83
    49
    Jan 8, 2009
    Yorkshire, NY
    0
    That's a good question! When I was in the Academy, the skills and road tests were adminstered by our range and road instructors.

    We were told that our road test examiner would be adminstered by an instructor who had not had us as his students - so that your teacher would not be administering the road test.

    However, the skills tests portion was both instructed, and "graded" (examined by) our own range instructor.

    At the time of the skills test "exam", they did not explain that it was not, as I thought, an "in-house" exam - I just thought it was a test to see if we were ready to do it with the road test, not ahead of time as a separate part of the road test!

    As stated before, we students had been assured that the instructors were all fully licensed as third-party examiners with the State of Tennessee.

    This raises some interesting questions: Which examiner was it? Are they investigating more than one examiner? When the instructors were operating as examiners, would they then be considered TDoS employees? Does the phrase "third-party examiner" refer to one examiner or to the company that operated as such?

    If the Swift instructors could be considered to be TDoS employees (as I would think they would) for those times that they operated as "examiners", then likely the State of Tennessee could be held liable for those examiners' improper testing procedures as a result of the State's negligence to adequately administer the licensing and oversee the operation of third-party examiners.

    However, sources continue to indicate to me that there may be more to the investigation than that - after all, this is not just a transportation investigation, but is also being investigated by branches of the State and Justice departments.

    No word yet either on whether Swift might allow the use of their trucks and drivers for disadvantaged Millington grads who are no longer in the industry.
     
    rikdev50s and Baack Thank this.
  6. rikdev50s

    rikdev50s Medium Load Member

    685
    170
    Aug 12, 2008
    Greer, SC
    0
    Now that adds a twist to the third party examiner...
     
  7. so can anyone give a real date the retesting is going back to
     
  8. TruckrsWife

    TruckrsWife Significant Otter

    3,208
    42,582
    Aug 29, 2008
    God's Country, CA
    0
    Tony, my husband was a trainer out of Lathrop, CA. One of his students that he knew about had to retake her test early last year, and she was trained/schooled in CA.
     
  9. tony282003

    tony282003 Light Load Member

    83
    49
    Jan 8, 2009
    Yorkshire, NY
    0

    All Millington students who graduated from May 2005 through January 2008 are subject to undergo re-exams to retain their CDLs.

    Each state is handling the issue differently - some states are only retesting drivers who've had reportable accidents, have doubles/triples or HazMat endorsements, etc. Other states are retesting all Millington grads from that timeframe.
     
    Baack Thanks this.
  10. tony282003

    tony282003 Light Load Member

    83
    49
    Jan 8, 2009
    Yorkshire, NY
    0
    That's interesting, though not completely uncommon, as my contacts in the industry have indicated that problems with third-party testers have been around as long as the third-party testers have.
     
  11. tony282003

    tony282003 Light Load Member

    83
    49
    Jan 8, 2009
    Yorkshire, NY
    0
    Wow, I think this is the first time you've admitted you work for them (Swift)!
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2009
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.