2005 kw t600

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by BILLYBOBBIGRIGGER, Oct 4, 2009.

  1. BILLYBOBBIGRIGGER

    BILLYBOBBIGRIGGER Bobtail Member

    24
    4
    Oct 4, 2009
    vernon ct
    0
    me and my bro are buying a 05 t600 with a c15 cat 435hp uprateable...13 speed...how are the 05 cat engines? the truck is in the 300s for miles...we are going to be running team..ive driven freightshakers for the past 10 years and all i had detroits...never driven a cat...any ifo would help on the truck and the engine....thanx:biggrin_25519:
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Big Duker

    Big Duker "Don Cheto"

    2,921
    2,868
    Sep 18, 2007
    Weatherford, TX
    0
    Need to post serial#. Probably a BXS. Lots of info here for that and all cat engines.
     
  4. pullingtrucker

    pullingtrucker Road Train Member

    1,185
    598
    Dec 21, 2008
    Fostoria, Ohio
    0
    The ACERT motor is a total different monster when it comes to running them efficently. The motor sounds different and even pulls at a lower RPM than the other Cats. The ACERTS are also a very stout motor once all the bugs are worked out of them (examples...exhuast flow, fuel flow, and timing). Read some of the other Cat threads or ask some question with the serial number prifix that ya got. Welcome to the boards and good luck.
     
  5. dieseldan2005

    dieseldan2005 Light Load Member

    185
    17
    Feb 6, 2009
    North Branch, MN
    0
    We have an 05 intl 9400 with a BXS 435 C15. It has just over 300k on it and its been running just fine. The international around it is another story, but the engine has been sound.
     
  6. Sarge

    Sarge Light Load Member

    157
    48
    Sep 9, 2007
    North Florida
    0

    I drove the same truck you are describing set up in the same manner.
    3.36 rears, 13 speed. When I got out of the truck it had around 450 on it.

    I loved that truck. The engine pulled hills better than any other I've had and I've had Cat's, Detroits, Cummins and Volvo.

    Hands down the Cat....

    The Jake brakes worked the best as well.
    It was not ACERT just twin turbo 475 HP.
    If and when I buy a truck, that would be high on the list. However, the 70 inch sleeper is a little cramped compared to the 86 studio for teaming.
    I also didn't like squeezing between the front seats to get to the sleeper. That's why I removed the passenger seat arm rest.
    Overall, I felt it was a superior truck in ride, quietness, handling, and durability of the suspension system.
    You can't go wrong with a KW.
     
  7. dieseldan2005

    dieseldan2005 Light Load Member

    185
    17
    Feb 6, 2009
    North Branch, MN
    0
    If it was a 2005 and it had a CAT then it was an ACERT. The acert came out after 2004 on all cat engines.
     
  8. Sarge

    Sarge Light Load Member

    157
    48
    Sep 9, 2007
    North Florida
    0
    You are right, it was ACERT.

    I still had no issues with the engine. We averaged around 6.5 to 7.0 MPG at 65 MPH. Depending on how we drove the truck and where we were at the time.

    At 68 MPH, It was somewhere around 6 to 6.3 MPG if my memory is correct.. Not too bad.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.