NJ EXPEDITE SUCKS

WOW. Even worse. At least set up at a new Loves.

 

Its amazing how much is public information and how little of this publicly-available information is used when drivers seek employment...

 

Speaking of public information, it would appear we have a chameleon on our hands... he used to be listed as the agent, secretary and president of MNJ Trucking, INC based out of a townhouse in Jacksonville, FL from 2/2017-8/2018. He also joined TSK Express out of the same office in the Pilot in 4/2021, taking over as agent from his relative, Mile Jerković. That one is headed up by Ondrej Sudicki, probably with the same business model, but they have lost their MC Authority and their DOT Number is inactive so who knows what the plan is there.

 

A successful business model for sure..lol

 

So was Arrow Trucking!

 

Yes, they do SUCK. They have ripped off every driver who worked for them whether it be O/O, Lease purchase, or "company driver." So glad I moved onto a legitimate company with benefits. Won't make that mistake again. Sure would have been nice to get my escrow and last two trips which was over $4K. Found out they have a class action lawsuit against them, so they were quick to file bankruptcy. Good news is they are "pending common revocation," according to carrier source Nj Expedite LLC | CarrierSource Bad news is they have been operating this Ponzi scheme for quite a bit. FMSCA needs to step it up because these Serbian's are well aware.

Also, here's the class action lawsuit info. >>>>> TSK EXPRESS: Violates Truth in Leasing Act, Dixon Class Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FRANKIE DIXON, MONIQUE PRIDGEN, ERNESTO YAQUE, WAYMAN PATTERSON,
YUSNIEL VAZQUEZ, EVELIO DELGADO RIVERA, and MARIO YODEL BORRAS
GONZALES v. TSK EXPRESS, LLC, NEMANJA JERKOVIC, and NJ EXPEDITE,
LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-00196-PAB (N.D. Ohio, Feb. 4, 2022) is
brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and all others similarly
situated seeking to redress Defendants' violations of the Truth in
Leasing Act.

The Named Plaintiffs and Class Plaintiffs seek damages caused by
Defendants' violations of lease and interchange regulations, 49
C.F.R. sections 376.11 and 376.12. In some instances, the
Defendants did not provide Named Plaintiffs and Class Plaintiffs
with a copy of their lease, says the suit.

The Plaintiffs assert that the Defendants entered into leases with
them and those similarly situated that violated the provisions of
the TILA. They leased a truck-tractor from Defendants and drove as
an independent owner-operators.

The Plaintiffs' leases with Defendants did not comply with 49 C.F.R
376.12(d) because they did not clearly state on the face of the
lease, or in an addendum which was attached to the lease, the
amount to be paid by Defendants to each Plaintiff for the lease of
his equipment and driver's services. In some instances, the
Defendants did not provide Named Plaintiffs and/or Class Plaintiffs
a copy of the lease. Also, Defendants did not provide Named
Plaintiffs and/or Class Plaintiffs with accurate information as to
the gross revenue of which Named Plaintiffs and/or Class Plaintiffs
were supposed to receive a percentage, the suit added.

TSK Express and NJ Expedite are motor carriers.[BN]

 

Are they hiring? I’d like to try my luck! Can’t be all bad…