SCOTUS rules 9-0 truck broker can be sued after deadly crashes

Discussion in 'Freight Broker Forum' started by Studebaker Hawk, May 14, 2026.

  1. Studebaker Hawk

    Studebaker Hawk Road Train Member

    3,029
    9,884
    Oct 18, 2010
    NW Indiana
    0
    This may change things dramatically.

     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. JimmyTwoTimes

    JimmyTwoTimes Medium Load Member

    408
    1,037
    Aug 23, 2019
    0
    I think it will definitely have an impact on crappy carriers and the brokers that use them. Will be interesting to see the long term ripples here.
     
  4. wichris

    wichris Road Train Member

    4,542
    9,368
    Jan 17, 2011
    0
    Interesting in that case was the carrier had a conditional rating.
     
    JimmyTwoTimes and pnw guy Thank this.
  5. pnw guy

    pnw guy Light Load Member

    106
    656
    Jun 18, 2018
    0
    Moving forward with how vetting will have to change, I'm curious how many brokers would even request a copy of the CAP without just saying "sorry cant work with ya" essentially killing off those carriers. I'm gonna say zero now.
     
    JimmyTwoTimes and Studebaker Hawk Thank this.
  6. wichris

    wichris Road Train Member

    4,542
    9,368
    Jan 17, 2011
    0
    Always asked for one but it all depended on the violations written up.
     
  7. Grumppy

    Grumppy Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    3,276
    11,656
    Dec 11, 2010
    West Monroe, La
    0
    I think its gonna be hard on the industry as a whole to some degree, especially newer O/O's unless you already have an existing relationship with the broker. Its gonna take more time to process a new account and process loads for new company/broker relationships. They'll absolutely be skiddish of carriers they have never dealt with. I think new O/Os and new numbers (DOT) are gonna have a hard time getting loads.
    Brokers are gonna really be carefull handing out loads to people they dont know after this.

    I think too, that its gonna push more loads to existing companies/relationships which will limit availability (trucks/companies/OOs) and will raise prices because its gonna reduce the number of trucks available to brokers... at least the trucks the brokers are willing to use.

    I think its obvious that brokers will start pulling FMCSA data and accident (SAFER) reports and I think its really gonna have an impact on hotshots.
     
  8. Studebaker Hawk

    Studebaker Hawk Road Train Member

    3,029
    9,884
    Oct 18, 2010
    NW Indiana
    0
    The various companies that provide the service of vetting carriers for either brokers or shippers will have to do much more due diligence than just scan the FMCSA data. The data is notoriously incomplete (chameleon carriers) and has been shown to be almost useless in determining the qualifications of a carrier.

    "The Hammer" and his ilk will take that apart very quickly if it ever goes to trial. The result, as you said will be to use existing long term quality broker/carrier relationships. It is just way to risky to do otherwise.
     
    Grumppy and JimmyTwoTimes Thank this.
  9. gentleroger

    gentleroger Road Train Member

    8,068
    22,068
    Jun 1, 2010
    0
    While I like this ruling, let's not pop the champagne quite yet. All they've said is the case can continue in the lower court, not that they will be successful.

    "Importantly, the Court’s decision today should not be read to mean that brokers will routinely be subject to state tort liability in the wake of truck accidents." Kavanaugh gave brokers a wide gap here. Plaintiffs will have to prove negligence, which is an uphill fight.

    "The brokers and their amici raise serious concerns about the repercussions of state tort liability against brokers, and they may of course (among other possibilities) ask Congress and the President to change federal law."

    It wouldn't take much convincing to induce the current administration to act, especially since they filled an amicus brief in support of brokers.
     
    JimmyTwoTimes Thanks this.
  10. Studebaker Hawk

    Studebaker Hawk Road Train Member

    3,029
    9,884
    Oct 18, 2010
    NW Indiana
    0
    I will put my money on "The Hammer" any day. The general public hates trucks.
    Finding a sympathetic jury pool to find for the plaintiffs is not difficult, even if it goes to trial, which is usually doesn't.
     
  11. gentleroger

    gentleroger Road Train Member

    8,068
    22,068
    Jun 1, 2010
    0
    The questions are "what constitutes acceptable due diligence?" and "is the hiring of the contractor a proximate cause?". Not to mention that this only applies to state courts, who have a cornucopia of differing standards for enforcing vicarious liability on employers of independent contractors.

    Is having a 'satisfactory' SAFER rating enough? An OOS rate below the national average? Crashes per million miles? Can the broker just make a carrier self certify the driver meets certain criteria? Would showing the safe conclusion of loads by similar carriers be an adequate defense? There's a lot left to play out before this becomes a reliable avenue to hold brokers accountable.
     
    JimmyTwoTimes Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.