Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC was decided by the US Supreme Court.
It puts the liability of an accident on the brokers now, so it is a big win for the trial lawyers and their victims, but can screw the brokers, especially the larger ones and the owner-operators who depend on broker freight.
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport Decided.
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by Ridgeline, May 14, 2026 at 4:15 PM.
-
D.Tibbitt, 201773, silverspur and 4 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Talking about that right now on Fox Business News.
silverspur Thanks this. -
Wouldn't it also put liability of an accident on Amazon involving their sub contractors? Basically Amazon is a broker, Amazon brokers their own freight.
-
-
Load rate "superspike" coming?.....
....:
SCOTUS to trigger truckload rate run to $5.00 per mile?
-- Lgentleroger and 201773 Thank this. -
Insurance rates superspike.
gentleroger Thanks this. -
----- "There are roughly 1.2 million trucks operating today with zero safety rating from FMCSA. Brokers now have to think hard about whether to put freight on those trucks at all.
This creates an immediate problem: if a carrier doesn’t have a safety rating, how does a broker demonstrate the due diligence the Court is now requiring?" -
I think small brokers actually benefit from this, while they will have to get liability coverage of some type, they also work with fewer shippers and fewer mega carriers, and more small trucking companies. They aren't out there trying to cover 4,000 loads a day for #### rates who act like they fought a war getting you an extra $100 on a rate or something, they are looking for competent, safe companies they can rely on, because they are only working with a few companies and don't want to screw up their relationships. At least that has been my experience with smaller brokers vs the larger brokers.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.