would this be a problem? It's kinda odd, makes me wonder if it's accurate. It's got 36k rears, 12k front axle and a 298" wheelbase
48,000 gvwr?
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by sharpshooter, Jan 9, 2011.
Page 1 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
That is one heavy truck. The only thing that would be good for in my opinion is running oversize loads.
-
Those rears a lightweights for heavy haul. I doubt that is the tare weight. It still seems low on gvwr though. Many I've seen are in the mid to high 60's. With such a long wheelbase it is a truck with limited usefulness.
-
Are you sure about the rears??? Most are at least 38k rated.... what make/model are the axles?
-
here's a link. they got the sleeper size wrong so, maybe the rears too.
http://www.truckpaper.com/listingsdetail/detail.aspx?OHID=2609179&dlr=1
I went to look at it but, it's behind the fence so I couldn't get to close -
The style of door handle on the truck in the picture hasn't been used since 2002. I don't belive that the truck shown is a 2005. My 2003 has the newer style door handles. -
-
KW does have an 82" studio sleeper, those one had the couch as a standard item in the bunk didn't they?
I would think that since it is a W900 the rears would be #46,000. -
Yea, that is a Studio Sleeper. Nice looking truck. A little on the heavy side but I'd take one.
-
Why would anyone name their dealership as such?
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 3