People are not joking about DAC report content.

i am not sure if the DAC office are located in the original build they once were in, since they have been bought out a couple of times, but from my memory, the "old" DAC offices had bullet proof glass in the reception area and you couldn't just walk in, for the very same reasons you mentioned...it DID happen, people WERE threatened, and the place went into a sort of "lock down" ever since then...but again, i do not know if they are in the same building anymore.....

 

Yea" your probably Right" Injun...after all; it's us scumbag Drivers...who are always! wrong! The DAC" (Parasites) folks-and the carrier's that use them...would never"ever" unjustly screw over a Driver! they treat us so well" and are only interested in doing what's best" for Drivers, their familys,the American public...Sorry" departed...a bit! you are right though...it would be "The Crazed" Trucker who made the news report...and not the reasons why!

 

This statement is very telling. With this sentence alone, you indicate there was something and you are not an entirely innocent party. Well, you're done trying to convince me, so you might as well out with it if for no other purpose than to satisfy my nosiness.

 

Sorry if you feel offended. But if you've been around truckers for more than a few months, you begin to realize there are a lot of whiners who never take responsibility for their own lives. This company did this to me, that four-wheeler made me do that, the customer made me do such-and-such, that cop is just picking on me....not me, not me, not me. Gets tiresome after a while.

The statement I quoted sounded like you didn't want Covenant to see what happened. If you are, in fact, a completely innocent party and did your job without complaint, accidents or service failures and you were picked on because the office person didn't like the way you wear your hair, then what's the problem with them looking into it?

I'm not accusing you of anything. I'm just saying there is very, very rarely a totally innocent party in any dispute. You have every right to fight this and. I hope you come out on top. And that's all I'm going to say about it.

As I said in another thread: If you feel like your toes were stepped on, maybe my statements are not far from the truth.

 

Injun here is what my Dispatcher did to me at a carrier I left in 98 I got a copy of my Dac in 06 as a Joke. He claimed I had 3 accidents 3 months After I left the company. He also claimed I get this Abandonded the truck 2 weeks BEFORE he claimed I had those 3 accidents that included 2 rollovers. Yes he is still with the COmpany and He is now the VP of the place. He cost me 2 jobs.

 

Sounds like a good lawsuit to me.

 

OOIDA took DAC on a few years ago in Colorado. Basically, the jist is this: DAC is still in business, trucking companies still report to them-but the court also said the driver could file a rebuttal about the report. The company is given an opportunity to reply if they don't the info must be removed, but the driver rebuttal remains in the report and that must be reported. If you're serious about your DAC get the report, rebuttal what info is incorrect and go on.

 

If I ever get my brain fixed any information in my DAC will be so out of date that I will be a freaking Trainee again.