Are Detroits THAT bad?

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by Wildcat74, Mar 2, 2011.

  1. kustom

    kustom Light Load Member

    59
    25
    Aug 11, 2010
    coos bay, oregon
    0
    The pre-egr 14.0L 575 detroit is in our experience, a very strong and efficient engine. It will absolutely edge out either a 550 cat or a 565 cummins and still maintain a minimum of a full 1 mpg better! I have to admit my blood runs yellow, but this peticular engine makes a believer out of me.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. groundpounder

    groundpounder Road Train Member

    2,569
    1,039
    Nov 13, 2009
    0
    Just curious, whats the torque on that 575 Detroit ??
     
  4. mackdaknyfe

    mackdaknyfe Light Load Member

    I've had the miss/pop/puff of smoke problem with mine from day one. I recently had a new turbo, new vpods and new delta-p sensors put on. The problem was still there. Monday the Detroit shop in Fleetwood PA adjusted the turbo. It now spools up like a dream and the problems seem to be gone.
    They took the time to test drive it and make it "pop", make a small adjustment and then do it again until it wouldn't "pop" anymore. So far so good. I've got an '04 Freightliner Classic XL and before it was averaging 5.7mpg no matter what I did. Hopefully I can get a little better now.
     
    2013Maxx Thanks this.
  5. rcaircraftnut

    rcaircraftnut Bobtail Member

    20
    0
    Jun 23, 2011
    Tn
    0
    Hope it works for you. I'm just very unhappy with mine. Even with the 5.8 MPI I'm averaging. It still annoys the crap outa me.
     
  6. favored

    favored Light Load Member

    51
    6
    Oct 7, 2010
    0
    i just sold my detroit 12.7...as some have said before they are weight sensitive. loaded id get around 5.9 and empty high as 6.9 or so. which half my miles are empty being i haul livestock and and deadhead back to the house usually. so id average overall mid sixes maybe. however if i was loaded most of the time i would get my average back up and plus it couldn't pull a hill with dropping 3 gears. i now have a 3406e cat...I couldn't be happier and will be staying yellow from now on. actually gets better mpg than the detroit and pulls a full load like theirs nothing behind it.

    plus i could never get the thing to stop leaking oil somewhere, they have some stupid designs on certain gaskets that have a hard time not leaking.
     
  7. JohnP3

    JohnP3 Road Train Member

    1,594
    682
    Feb 21, 2010
    Rock Creek B.C. Canada
    0
    As a mechanic that works on engines, all the talk about S60's being leakers is BS. and talk of fuel mileage from a CAT is laughable.
    I was the guy fixing the leakers.
     
  8. lovesthedrive

    lovesthedrive R.I.P.

    15,953
    54,481
    Nov 11, 2008
    Sorrento Maine
    0
    To me an engine is a engine. Your just delving into flavors of engine. Everyone will be one flavor over the other. Some will say that their flavor is better than others. All that is fine.

    To me its called accessability. Which one is the easier to work on.

    Cats from what I have read have something funky going on with their valve covers and require shims? I also have heard you have to be careful with cats injectors as some come from Mexico and will not last long.

    On Cummins supposedly they have coolant to water pump issues.

    Mostly I think (and this is just me) that people dislike detroits as they are the common engines in Freightliners. Most companies these days will start you out with a Freightliner and people love to trash them for their own reasons.

    I tend to think that if the driver started out on the Freightliner and learned to dislike it, then the fact it came with a detroit is why they want something else. Mind you this is only speculation with no fact.

    The real thing is. Get what you want / need. If it works for you I am glad. I am not going to tell you that you must do one flavor over the other. Just get the flavor you desire and respect that not everyone out their needs to have YOUR flavor.
     
  9. groundpounder

    groundpounder Road Train Member

    2,569
    1,039
    Nov 13, 2009
    0
    So those of us complaining about Series 60's leaking are making it up ??
     
  10. 25(2)+2

    25(2)+2 Trucker Forum STAFF Staff Member

    18,693
    43,198
    Sep 18, 2006
    the road less travelled
    0
    The first 14 liter Detroits were rated at 525, 550, and 575, with 575 only available in FL in the late 90s and early 2000s.

    Later on, the horsepower was dropped to 515, as the higher horsepower engines had cooling issues when the power was used too much,as in a long climb up a mountain. I think emissions regulation may have been part of it, too

    Some of them ran really great, and lasted, and others didn't. That can be said of any of them.

    The torque was rated at 1850 ft lbs I think but it may have been optimistic or conservative. The newer 14 liter Series 60 was top rated for torque to 1650 ft lbs.

    Most of the ones I see now are 500 horsepower or less, the 2008 I drive now is 455/1550 ft lbs torque.
     
    2013Maxx, RERM and groundpounder Thank this.
  11. Pablo-UA

    Pablo-UA Road Train Member

    7,604
    1,640
    Oct 11, 2010
    Borispol, Ukraine
    0
    1850 ft lbs ~ 2500 NM is very good value of torque. OM460 (12.7l) 440 HP is 2100 NM rated (1550 ft lbs) and runs good, so seems to me the real 14L torque is about 1700.

    And as I know more then 2500 NM torque may be dangerouse for engine. In combination with bad oiling it may destroy engine
     
    25(2)+2 and groundpounder Thank this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.