What exactly is the real world translation between the rr of any two tires in a real world environment? Obviously the comparative between a Michelin XDA Energy rr99 and a BFG DR444 rr 143 probably doesn't need a lot of explaining.
Let's take two 11R22.5's: A Yokohama 703ZL with a rolling resistance of 118, and a Michelin XDA3 with a rolling resistance of 114. What type of fuel differentation will these two drive tires exhibit?
Rolling Resistance
Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by Lockport, Oct 3, 2011.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Have you tried the Michelin fuel mileage calculator ?
http://www.michelintruck.com/michelintruck/toolbox/FuelSavcalculator.jsp
That's likely the closest you'll get to " guestimating " before hand. -
This is very interesting...
http://www.bridgestonetrucktires.com/us_eng/real/magazines/99V4Issue1/ra8.htm
This is very dated however , they are running there cpm calculations at 95 cents a gallon. -
I have a spread axle trailer and since almost half of my miles are empty, would making the front axle liftable reduce my rolling resistance & help save fuel????
-
granhawler, yes being able to lift an axle will improve fuel milage as well as extend the life of your tires.
-
Yes it will help. I lift mine every chance I get, even when I.m loaded lite I'll keep it up. I'll gain .5 mpg with it up. Only bad thing is you'll have a 48 foot trailer with the axle all the way to the rear and it wont turn as sharp.
-
Absolutely! If it's a normal non drive lift axle you will also save on mechanical frictional losses, recently I did a trip to holland for a friend, there were 2 trucks, one 6*4 and one 6*2 rear lift axle, both scania r620's , both auto gearboxes with the same diffs and both had the same load, the 6*2 was 1mpg better on fuel and I'm told by a person better experienced than me in this field( I'm used to general haulage tractors, 6*2 & 4*2) it can be as much as 2 mpg , Alot of lift axles here would have just single wheels on them to reduce drag even more and Alot of lift axles would steer also , this saves tyres and greatly reduces understeer in wet conditions compared to 6*4 or 6*2 non steer.
Center lift is nicer to drive but rear lift has much better traction even better than tandem drive once you don't go off road, the reason for this is the fifth wheel is mounted behind the drive axle and transfer some weight onto the drive axle it will press the wheels on the drive into the road giving fantastic grip
A lift axle here is far cheaper on a new truck than a double drive, also there is less maintenance , less tyre wear and at our fuel prices 1 mpg would mean about $11,000 to $14,000 per year to me, if 2 mpg is achievable then it's double that, I hope this is of some help to you. -
Cool. Thanks. $428 a year more on fuel at 6mpg if I use the Yokohama 703ZL as opposed to the Michelin XDA3. I am going to be running lots of BC mountains this winter and like the aggressive tread of the 703ZL much more than the XDA3.
I saw this calc before but was not aware it was an instantaneous online result.
-
Makes a huge difference Granhawler....The less wheels you have on the ground...the less energy you need to move them/drive themThe Challenger Thanks this. -
Out of curiosity, whats the maximum weight one can haul when a axle is lifted up??
KH
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2