EcoTaz Test by Dice

If I could get the Volunteers and the Guys that paid for the units to Drive 57 mph and lighter loads we could probably see 11's

 

The fleet mangers use the gallons used to miles driven also, but for cpmparing apples to apples the look mainly at idle times and average speed on the ecm just to compliment the test.
Dice you should know that you can skew any test of any product when before and after by idling less or longer or by speeding up or slowing down, When I asked for this report is when you rejected to test. That is OK if you do not want to show all your cards it is no problem. No one is twisting your arms to test.
It is all about saving Money for the Profesional O/O's.

 

Your sales pitching is getting a little far fetched now.

 

The figures you quote will be questioned by some.
I know they are just general and used to illustrate a point.
There is just one major flaw in the reasoning.
Lets say only 40% of energy that is released during the combustion is used to propel the truck.
That the combustion process is only releasing 90% of the energy contained in the fuel.
You are now saying that if it were possible to squeeze the remaining 10% energy out of the fuel in the combustion process then this could only possibly convert @ 40% of a 10% increase.
Thus only 4% is ultimately possible.
The flaw in this reasoning is that it is incorrectly amused that the losses
like wind,friction,noise , heat etc will also increase proportionally to increase in burn efficiency.
The truth being that if it was possible to squeeze an extra 10% of energy out of the fuel and the losses like wind resistance , noise etc stayed constant.
The increase could potently be a 10% increase in total energy contained in the fuel now being used to propel the truck.
Where it was stated that only 40% of the extracted energy was converted to propelling the truck.
This could now be 50%.
This is a potential 25% increase in fuel mileage not 4%.

This is the same reasoning that people miss when saying it is impossible to get gains claimed for coated bearings etc.
The less efficient an engine the easier it is to get % gains in fuel mileage.
The efficiency gains are not claimed buy the establish losses (60%) they are added to the propulsion of the truck.

 

Having read the whining by these two "little girls" about their products it does seem like they're both more interested in their respective "fan clubs" than anything else.

Ecotaz (stupid name) is the same snake oil as the Turbo3000 and works just as well.

The MicroBlue probably has some merit and looks interesting....But I'm not gonna tear my truck apart to replace parts that aren't broken just to find out.
I'm not gonna drive down the road at 57-60 MPH to find out either.

You both need to "grow up" and realize that when you are hawking a product whether it's a good product or a bad product, There are gonna be competitors that will come around and tell everyone that your product is not good and that you are fudging your numbers and so on....

The merits of something like the MicroBlue treatment are fairly obvious and the claims are logical based on the fact that when you reduce friction the machine is automatically more efficient.

The idea of installing a little metal tube with some goofy baffling inside on a fuel line and suddenly getting better mileage is a little less credible to say the least....Turbo3000 and Ecotaz are essentially the same thing and we all know how well Turbo3000 worked!

It is interesting to note though....There are still people out here that are buying the Turbo3000 and claiming that they're getting better fuel mileage with it!

I guess P.T.Barnum was right.

 

wow. way to talk down to.everyone dice. glad your so much more eveolved than the rest of us lowly owner ops.

 

EVERYONE wants to get better fuel mileage! If a fuel saving product manufacturer or marketer wants to make millions while sitting on the back of their yacht in the Los Suenos marina in Costa Rica with the local hootchy koochy girls in bikinis feeding him grapes, than all they have to do is have a proper certified test done that verifies the validity and results of their product claims.

Or, another way is to tell a lie enough times and eventually people will believe it.

The companies that spend a fortune on marketing the lies do it for a reason.