Accident Caused by Chicane

Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by Wooly Rhino, Dec 9, 2012.

  1. Wooly Rhino

    Wooly Rhino Road Train Member

    3,367
    5,648
    Jul 6, 2008
    Liberty, Missouri
    0
    Thursday Morning early there was a wreck on US Highway 169 3 miles north of Nowata, Oklahoma. The wreck was caused by a driver trying to go through the Chicane that was put in place to protect the bridge workers. The signs showed a curve but not a chicane. The speed was 45 and the driver was going 38 when he entered the chicane. He was hauling a load of liquor in bottles. The quick turns required to make the chicane caused the trailer to swing back and forth. He clipped the last barrier and broke the steering link and then went off the road crossing the other lane and ended up in a ditch 20 feet below the road way. The tractor trailer was a complete loss.

    The chicane was three quaters of a mile north of the work site and the site was not active at night. The question is, as the purpose of the Chicane is to disable traffic that is going over the designed speed of the chicane should the bridge company be liable for the accident?

    Did anyone else see the accident or the result?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. FatDaddy

    FatDaddy Road Train Member

    4,314
    10,375
    Dec 23, 2008
    Katy, TX or Swedesboro, NJ
    0
    Sorry to hear about your wreck...
     
  4. D33RHUNT3R

    D33RHUNT3R Medium Load Member

    643
    393
    Jun 2, 2012
    Nw Arkansas
    0

    Driver was going to fast for conditions...
     
  5. Wooly Rhino

    Wooly Rhino Road Train Member

    3,367
    5,648
    Jul 6, 2008
    Liberty, Missouri
    0
    Not my wreck. And Driver going to fast for conditions would make all wrecks the drivers fault. What happened here is that the bridge company decided to booby trap a section of the road. There is no reason to put a chicane on a highway when a sweeping curve would do the same thing. Chicanes are for racetracks not highways.
     
  6. D33RHUNT3R

    D33RHUNT3R Medium Load Member

    643
    393
    Jun 2, 2012
    Nw Arkansas
    0
    and there you have it !!!
    So how many other trucks had this problem ?


    Failure to keep vehicle under control is ALWAYS the DRIVERS Fault !!!
     
    Lonesome, Hammer166 and joseph1135 Thank this.
  7. Jbkrash

    Jbkrash Light Load Member

    92
    42
    Sep 5, 2012
    Mchenry County Illinois
    0
    Hello, I mean no disrespect I'm just asking what is a Chicane? I've never heard or read that term? Is that like a large orange cone or barricade? I would have to agree with D33R though, driver might have been going to fast for conditions? If they were in a construction zone at night with signs and barricades up you still should be slowing down for lane changes and such. I'm one of those drivers that does the speed limit or under in any construction zone whether working or not, yep I'm one of those guys hot dogs yell at on the CB. Pavement height changes, lane changes, cones, signs, state troopers, to many variables for a bad situation for me better to be cautious then in a ditch. Bridge company liable? Just my 2 cents.:biggrin_2555:
     
  8. rockee

    rockee Road Train Member

    1,393
    673
    Apr 17, 2007
    Pacific Northwest
    0
    Isn't the purpose of a chicane to slow traffic down? If he was going to fast would it not be his fault? You can't possibly think the bridge company "booby trapped" a section of road and if they did, how come he was the only one that fell for it?
     
    Hammer166 Thanks this.
  9. david123abc

    david123abc Heavy Load Member

    839
    784
    Feb 2, 2011
    Augusta, GA
    0
    The fact that he was already going under the speed limit (or recommendefd speed maybe) may come into play if it were to go to court. As everyone knows though, the speed limit signs are usually intended for cars, and truck drivers are supposed to know the maximum safe speed may be well under the posted limit depending on how the vehicle is loaded.

    At the end of the day though, I doubt you would be able to prove it was not caused by diver error. Especially considering it was a single accident involving a single vehicle. If 2 or 3 trucks turned over in a relatively short period of time, then it may be a different story.
     
  10. Wooly Rhino

    Wooly Rhino Road Train Member

    3,367
    5,648
    Jul 6, 2008
    Liberty, Missouri
    0
    I have been through the Chicane there twice before. I knew it was there. The driver involved was on his first past through the place. It was not mark as a chicane. It was marked as a curve. It was also marked as 45 MPH. Speed bumps are placed on roads to slow traffic down. Most have a speed sign by them. The signs might read 15 mph. I believe you would tear up your car if you hit a speed bump at 15 mph. Going through this Chicane at the recommended speed of 45 mph in a loaded semi trailer is dangerous. It is dangerous by design. Thus the booby trap. You can make the road safe for workers without having to make is unsafe for truckers.

    A chicane is an artificial feature creating extra turns in a road, used in motor racing and on streets to slow traffic for safety.

    My point is that the safety of a trucker should be just as important as the safety of a worker. I hope the driver sues the highway department and the bridge folks. If he lived that is.
     
    Rugerfan Thanks this.
  11. joseph1135

    joseph1135 Papa Murphy

    11,340
    27,301
    Nov 8, 2009
    The Highway To Hell.
    0
    The chicane didn't cause the wreck. The driver did. Its called being prepared for anything. Obviously other drivers did it without crashing. No excuses.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.