ok guys i ned some help. doing some research on bign an O/O.
engine would be a Cat C15 eaton 13 spd lo pro 22.5
Cat 3406 13 spd lo pro 22.5
or it would be a Detroits S60 eaton 13 spd lo pro 22.5
HP i am looking at around 450-500 HP
this would be used for FLATBED work so a Midroof or flat top would be preferred
whatever body it has im ok with. just want a truck body that has limited wiring issues. i know that none are perfect.
can you guys give me some pointers?
still wokring on the rear end ratio's so im open to that, im not sure on were i want to run prob western 11.
thanks in advance for the help. wan something from 00-05
best body for milage
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by damutt, Dec 27, 2013.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Out of those options the S60 will probably get you the best mileage, but its not gonna pull like either of the CATs when rated at the same HP/torque.
-
......no lead in the right foot.....I couldn't resist.
-
you'll want the CAT 3406E or C15 (but not ACERT models) for the terrain in 11 Western states(well, 10 Western states, California needs 2008 and up engines).
Rears: 3.55 to 3.70:1 and drive it 55 to 60 mph if you want a little money left over to take home. Rates and volume are low and deadhead and fuel is high when running the West.
Good luck and enjoy the snow and ice. -
3 responses and not one even attempted to address a simple question.
Of the new tractors Cascadia and Prostar are the most aerodynamic. Going older probably Columbia and Century. 9200i/9400i Internationals are about the same as a Century and I prefer the midroof IH to the Midroof Shakers because I can stand up straight even at 6'3" tall.
I havent done any work on the aero shakers but the 9k series IH's are a dream with wiring compared to the older shakers. -
myself if buying another truck it would be the 9400I, just me
-
Freightliner Columbia's and Cascadia's, Kenworth T600's and T660's, Pete 387's, the usual suspects. But if your buying a used truck it may be more practical to just go off of the ECM data, it's usually off by 0.5 mpg on the high side but still accurate. there's a lot of variance in CAT motors, some of them just don't seem to get over 5.5 no matter what you do. Of course the ECM data is going to only reflect the driver and the duty of the truck, but all the more reason to buy it IMO. If it's showing 7+ mpg you probably have an example of a good fuel mileage truck with a good driver and a fairly easy life history.
Cetane+ Thanks this. -
Actually, It did answer some of what his concerns were. Just had no answer on which model has fewest wiring problems.
Now to the point. Why do you need to preface your comment by putting other posters down?
Who else do you abuse like that in such an unprovoked manner? Your kids, your wife? Do you have a bad relationship with your mother? Was your father abusive? It's got to end somewhere. How will it end?
These important questions are for you to ponder. I don't need your answers nor your abuse. Feel me? -
hey guys thanks for h help sure ansers lotta questions. im just trying to do some leg work on being an O/O can you give me and idea of IFTA/ reg/ins that i cn crunch number son the cost side? thos i kjnow i can control. freight cost is a variance that i have no real cotrol over. truck will be puchsed CASH so tha is one less expnse. i know i have to have some stashed away for PM. and unexpcted repairs.
thanks -
Actually no. Get back to me after you take your midol and maybe we can discuss it then.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2